Quote Originally Posted by VagalTone View Post
That's an implicit important question, but i am asking about karma . Thatīs a different field of knowledge. It has no other implications beyond religion, i hope.

Conversely, you can answer many questions with the best scientific evidence and still get another answer or perspective by religion, because they have different modes of inquiry and different biases.

You can answer that implicit question but it wonīt change centuries of religious philosophy.

So in short, i want an answer based on tibetan buddhism philosophy, not in science.

I think you've misunderstood Jesus of Suburbia.

I think he just meant you can't ask the question "does a mentally disabled person accumulate karma?" without FIRST asking "well, are they accountable for their actions?"

The reason why it matters is because there are a lot of different understandings of how karma works. Does a person get the same karma for accidentally running someone over, killing them, versus a malicious intent to kill? Is it t he same karma if a lion eats a human versus if a human eats a human?

So for a lot of people, understanding the level of innocence does matter if you're talking about karma.

But then again, not all understandings of karma is the same. In some circles innocence doesn't matter. All karma is the return of your actions. Its completely unbiased and doesn't care if you were naive. Its why people pray to gurus or gods, to hold the karmic balance because they were ignorant and didn't know what they were doing.