Quote Originally Posted by Xaqaria View Post
Actually, I'm saying awareness is a function of the senses, and consciousness is an unknown variable. You may say that it is a product of the brain but as of yet, there is no evidence for that.
There is no evidence of what? That awareness is a function of the brain? All of neuroscience shows this. Just google it. I think you are trying to distinguish something "special" of awareness compared to consciousness. If you can distinguish the two, please do.

Quote Originally Posted by Serkat View Post
For all I've ever heard about God, these statements don't apply. God is pretty much just a regular supernatural being, except he created the universe and then went with it. So really he is pretty much here all the time and pretty much not timeless, just more awesome than everybody else.
The idea is that a God that created everything ought not to be subject to time.

And as for semantics, I don't see why you're making a distinction between 'phenomenological' and 'consciousness'. That's like saying 'Consciousness is necessary for conscious beings to exist' which isn't really saying anything at all.
I was not making a distinction - they are both the samething. Phenomenology is simply the act of being aware of your experience or awareness (and others).

Quote Originally Posted by Xei View Post
Your argument is this:

1. Consciousness requires time.
2. Omipotent, omniscient beings are timeless.
3. Hence any omnipotent, omniscient being is not conscious.

So far you have only asserted 2, as Serkat says.

Everything is made of energy, sure, but not kinetic energy. Light has no kinetic energy, for example, but it still exists, and causes change. Kinetic energy is just a function of mass and velocity. I do not see why mass or velocity are required for consciousness.
I'm not really debating about energies here.. all I know about physics tells me that there is a heated debate over light and whether or not it has energy.

Regardless, is this really pertinent to my argument? Gods created everything, including time. Time is what gives rise to consciousness. Thus, Gods ought not to have consciousness. Nothing about energy really.

And I disagree about there being a point of stasis. Time started at the Big Bang, and at the Big Bang, matter was flying apart at huge speeds. It has not stopped. So there was never a time during which there was stasis. It is wrong to think of a singularity existing for some period of time before expanding to form the universe, because time simply didn't exist before it expanded.
That's fine. I humbly admit that it is a problematic part of my own personal theory. However, it is not pertinent to my point. I am just filling in the background really.

Does this really affect my main argument? I don't see how. If it does, I truly want to.

~