Hmm.
I wonder here if another question shouldn't be asked on this topic: Is there really "normal behavior" in a dream?
Seriously. We are all individuals, and all our dreams are generated in a manner that reflects our unique personalities and life experiences. Sure, similar people might have similar dreams, and there are arguably archetypes (i.e., the presence of water, or public nudity, or perhaps being handed a test for a class that you hadn't attended all year) that may hold similar symbolic meaning in most of our dreams -- or not, as Azaleaj noted about nudity in her dreams. But it may be a mistake to assume that there are any "normal" images or behaviors in dreams; and I believe that that mistake has been made quite often in popular books (especially dream dictionaries, which in my mind are invariably useless) and forums like this, to the point where dreamers start to think they're supposed to dream in a certain way, and that if they don't then their dreams are weird, different, or somehow wrong. This is especially true with LD'ing, where novices feel like they must experience or do specific things when lucid and if they don't then they've somehow failed... and that is not a good thing, in the end.
For instance, Cron, your example of clocks always working for you is a good one: Yes, for most of us clocks (especially digital ones) tend to change their readout each time we glance at them in a dream. But if your dreaming mind has established that clocks don't change, then they don't; and that is not unusual at all, but rather simply the way your mind has chosen to present an image in your dreams. As an extension of this, I wonder how many dreamers actually cause the clocks to change, thanks to their expectation that that will happen (same goes for reading text, BTW, which is something I personally have never had trouble with),
So maybe the real thing to wonder about is when similar images or behaviors occur, as in Azaleaj's example above, because that could reflect true oddness.
|
|
Bookmarks