 Originally Posted by juroara
ohh thank you! you posted the math!
thats nice!
but so what.
I'm not going to build a building here xei, I could careless about the math of the golden ratio.
And while you may think you're making yourself look so smart, it just makes you look foolish. Because the point of Sacred Geometry has gone way over your head
the very heart of Sacred Geometry is that everything is related. Everything is connected. Unity. This is the point of Sacred Geometry. This is WHY people study it. You study Sacred Geometry if you are interested in a holistic understanding of our universe.
holism –noun Philosophy.
1. the theory that whole entities, as fundamental components of reality, have an existence other than as the mere sum of their parts.
universe - the whole world, esp. with reference to humanity: a truth known throughout the universe.
"holistic understanding of our universe" as a standalone phrase does not make sense. How can you get an understanding that everything that exists is more than the sum of itself? ANY understanding of the universe is by definition all-encompassing.
 Originally Posted by juroara
If someone wants to know the math of the golden ratio, they pull out a math book. If they want to know how the golden ratio is connected to the harmonics of music, Sacred Geometry is better than any math book.
Why doesn't a music textbook work? Those do, in fact, exist. And in the ones I have seen, no Sacred Geometry shows up anywhere, unless you consider the number 2 to be somehow sacred.
 Originally Posted by juroara
you may freely post your opinion that everything is chance. however, this is not a thread to debate whether things are connected or whether things are chance.
this is instead a thread to discover how things are connected through Sacred Geometry, to gain a holistic knowledge for the mere joy of enrinching your mind. and then when you have this holistic knowledge you can apply it to either a left(scientific) or right(philosophical) brain activity.
holism –noun Philosophy.
1. the theory that whole entities, as fundamental components of reality, have an existence other than as the mere sum of their parts.
 Originally Posted by juroara
Sacred Geometry is NOT left brained (science and mathematics)
Sacred Geometry is NOT right brained (philosophy and religion)
Sacred Geometry is BOTH and NEITHER
There is a left-brained and a right-brained approach to studying Sacred Geometry, both are very different approaches. BOTH ARE EQUALLY VALID.
One asks you to quiet your mind and meditate. One asks you to know your sciences. But BOTH persons ENJOY the holistic feeling that Sacred Geometry has to offer. This wonderfull feeling of unity. They both enjoy it. They both welcome it. Even those who take the left-brain approach would never use chance to describe what they are seeing.
holism –noun Philosophy.
1. the theory that whole entities, as fundamental components of reality, have an existence other than as the mere sum of their parts.
If you want to attach the word "holistic" to everything in the post, please make sure you use it correctly.
 Originally Posted by juroara
There are however more right brained people studying it than left brained people.
This is not because there is no left brain approach or left brained application of it. But rather our formal education is left brained, so usually left brained people are very happy with formal education and are less likely to turn to alternative studies
The video that I posted is a left brain application of Sacred Geometry
the scientist looks at his geometrical design.......and realizes the design isn't perfect. it's missing two points. he literally adds two new points to his design. By doing so, he is theorizing that these two points are yet to be seen particles.
He even says he is using the Theory of Unification. This is Sacred Geometry.
So far, there is no Theory of Unification, or as it is sometimes called, Grand Unification Theory. A Grand Unification Theory is any model that claims that all four fundamental interactions save gravity are mediated by the same field, especially at extremely high energy levels. Sure, lots of them have been proposed, but so far none of them have enough evidence to back themselves up.
|
|
Bookmarks