 Originally Posted by Licity
"holistic understanding of our universe" as a standalone phrase does not make sense. How can you get an understanding that everything that exists is more than the sum of itself? ANY understanding of the universe is by definition all-encompassing.
Why doesn't a music textbook work? Those do, in fact, exist. And in the ones I have seen, no Sacred Geometry shows up anywhere, unless you consider the number 2 to be somehow sacred.
So far, there is no Theory of Unification, or as it is sometimes called, Grand Unification Theory. A Grand Unification Theory is any model that claims that all four fundamental interactions save gravity are mediated by the same field, especially at extremely high energy levels. Sure, lots of them have been proposed, but so far none of them have enough evidence to back themselves up.
you're losing track of what Sacred Geometry is about, and you're losing track of my posts in context
I don't understand what the language barrier is here guys, but Sacred Geometry is not mystical
nor does it propose to exist outside of our natural universe
on the other hand, it proposes that it IS the geometry of our natural universe. what in our reality, is not about of our natural universe? this is one reason why I call it holistic
holistic as in:
relating to or concerned with wholes or with complete systems rather than with the analysis of, treatment of, or dissection into parts
you can apply Sacred Geometry to biology, to physics, to mathematics
but it doesn't end there!
you can also apply Sacred Geometry to art, culture, religion, philosophy, architecture, engineering (my sister has examples in her design book)
this was why I said the applications were endless, because there are both left and right brain applications. and I dont know why I have to continously repeat myself, anyone who studies Sacred Geometry it is very holistic. It naturally leads to other fields of study, it doesn't box itself up
unless I have a hearing problem, the man in the video said "Theory of Unification". I dont care if his theory is right or wrong
it was merely an example of how you can apply Sacred Geometry, it was not an argument to whether or not the theory was correct
I also stressed unified, because many scientists stress how unified our universe is - for one reason or the other. I'm not a scientist, I am not arguing for or against their ideas. I was merely pointing out that both scientists and Sacred Geometry proposed similar ideas about our universe
in other words, Sacred Geometry has not gone against our sciences in any way. but rather offer a slightly different, perspective of the big picture
|
|
Bookmarks