• Lucid Dreaming - Dream Views




    Results 1 to 25 of 53
    Like Tree19Likes

    Thread: Discussion of Homosexuality Acceptance (Split)

    Threaded View

    1. #5
      Astral Adept Shamanite's Avatar
      Join Date
      Nov 2011
      LD Count
      10
      Gender
      Location
      Virginia
      Posts
      68
      Likes
      20
      DJ Entries
      19
      Quote Originally Posted by BLUELINE976 View Post
      But they're not based in fallacious logic. If anything, the increasing widespread acceptance of homosexuals, transgenders, and even pedophiles is a sign of our improved understanding of human psychology and what people CAN choose about themselves and what they cannot. My use of the James Cantor quote was an example: if a person cannot choose what or who they are attracted to, why is it right that we should, say, shame them, or try to deny them the full rights the rest of us enjoy? Obviously pedophilia is an extreme example; they are attracted to children. That in itself is not a problem, but their actions in satisfying that attraction are.

      I agree that our consideration of our fellow humans with varied sexual orientations should be based on facts, but certainly not traditional morals. The argument from tradition is the thing that is based in fallacious logic. They used that argument to try to make interracial marriage seem bad, even unnatural.

      Redefining our terms is not necessarily a bad thing.
      According to the American Psychiatric Association, until 1974 homosexuality was a mental illness. Freud had alluded to homosexuality numerous times in his writings, and had concluded that paranoia and homosexuality were inseparable. Other psychiatrists wrote copiously on the subject, and homosexuality was “treated” on a wide basis. There was little or no suggestion within the psychiatric community that homosexuality might be conceptualized as anything other than a mental illness that needed to be treated. And, of course, homosexuality was listed as a mental illness in DSM-II.

      Then in 1970 gay activists protested against the APA convention in San Francisco. These scenes were repeated in 1971, and as people came out of the “closet” and felt empowered politically and socially, the APA directorate became increasingly uncomfortable with their stance. In 1973 the APA’s nomenclature task force recommended that homosexuality be declared normal. The trustees were not prepared to go that far, but they did vote to remove homosexuality from the list of mental illnesses by a vote of 13 to 0, with 2 abstentions. This decision was confirmed by a vote of the APA membership, and homosexuality was no longer listed in the seventh edition of DSM-II, which was issued in 1974.

      What’s noteworthy about this is that the removal of homosexuality from the list of mental illnesses was not triggered by some scientific breakthrough. There was no new fact or set of facts that stimulated this major change. Rather, it was the simple reality that gay people started to kick up a fuss. They gained a voice and began to make themselves heard. And the APA reacted with truly astonishing speed. And with good reason. They realized intuitively that a protracted battle would have drawn increasing attention to the spurious nature of their entire taxonomy. So they quickly “cut loose” the gay community and forestalled any radical scrutiny of the DSM system generally.

      Also might I draw your attention to some studies and statistics.

      1. Gay men are 44 times more likely to have HIV http://www.gmhc.org/news-and-events/...ely-to-get-hiv

      Promiscuity

      28% of homosexual men had more than 1000 partners: "Bell and Weinberg reported evidence of widespread sexual compulsion among homosexual men. 83% of the homosexual men surveyed estimated they had had sex with 50 or more partners in their lifetime, 43% estimated they had sex with 500 or more partners; 28% with 1,000 or more partners. Bell and Weinberg p 308." (exodusglobalalliance.org/ishomosexualityhealthyp60.php)
      79% of homosexual men say over half of sex partners are strangers: "The survey showed 79% of the respondents saying that over half of their sexual partners were strangers. Seventy percent said that over half of their sexual partners were people with whom they had sex only once. Bell and Weinberg pp.308-309." (exodusglobalalliance.org/ishomosexualityhealthyp60.php)
      Modal range for homosexual sex partners 101-500: "In their study of the sexual profiles of 2,583 older homosexuals published in Journal of Sex Research, Paul Van de Ven et al. found that "the modal range for number of sexual partners ever [of homosexuals] was 101–500." In addition, 10.2 percent to 15.7 percent had between 501 and 1000 partners. A further 10.2 percent to 15.7 percent reported having had more than 1000 lifetime sexual partners. Paul Van de Ven et al., "A Comparative Demographic and Sexual Profile of Older Homosexually Active Men," Journal of Sex Research 34 (1997): 354." (exodusglobalalliance.org/ishomosexualityhealthyp60.php)
      1978 study, 78% of gay men ad more than 100 partners, 28% more than 1000: "A far-ranging study of homosexual men published in 1978 revealed that 75 percent of self-identified, white, gay men admitted to having sex with more than 100 different males in their lifetime: 15 percent claimed 100-249 sex partners; 17 percent claimed 250-499; 15 percent claimed 500-999; and 28 percent claimed more than 1,000 lifetime male sex partners. By 1984, after the AIDS epidemic had taken hold, homosexual men were reportedly curtailing promiscuity, but not by much. Instead of more than 6 partners per month in 1982, the average non-monogamous respondent in San Francisco reported having about 4 partners per month in 1984." (catholiceducation.org/articles/homosexuality/ho0075.html)
      There is an extremely low rate of sexual fidelity among homosexual men as compared to married heterosexuals. Among married females 85% reported sexual fidelity. Among married men, 75.5% reported sexual fidelity. Among homosexual males in their current relationship, 4.5% reported sexual fidelity. (Sources:Laumann, The Social Organization of Sexuality, 216; McWhirter and Mattison, The Male Couple: How Relationships Develop (1984): 252-253; Wiederman, "Extramarital Sex," 170. This is extracted from http://www.frc.org/get.cfm?i=IS04C02)

      Having homosexuality as a positive alternative to heterosexuality in society does not make it better but leads to social and moral decay. It also leads to a massive spread of STD's
      Last edited by Shamanite; 09-03-2014 at 01:28 AM.

    Similar Threads

    1. non-Acceptance of LD's
      By Rothgar in forum General Lucid Discussion
      Replies: 23
      Last Post: 02-19-2014, 04:03 PM
    2. Split Marijuana Discussion
      By Alexander1656 in forum Extended Discussion
      Replies: 106
      Last Post: 09-07-2010, 12:39 AM
    3. Vegetarian Discussion Split
      By AmazeO XD in forum The Lounge
      Replies: 67
      Last Post: 08-25-2009, 10:44 PM
    4. "Guns R Retarded" (split from pic discussion)
      By Liam in forum Extended Discussion
      Replies: 45
      Last Post: 08-10-2006, 07:28 PM
    5. Acceptance and Flying
      By sephiroth clock in forum Lucid Experiences
      Replies: 1
      Last Post: 10-05-2004, 01:21 PM

    Bookmarks

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •