Hi shadowofwind,
As a starting point, I would say that your comments should remind us overall of what C.G. Jung said about looking at dreams: “… we must handle dreams with nuance, like a work of art, not logically or rationally, as one may make a statement, but with a small restriction somewhere. It is the creative art of nature which makes the dream, so we must be up to it when we try to interpret them”.
And a dream forum, while of course valuable because most of us have no other access to learning about dreams, does have its limitations.
For me, I feel it’s important to keep things simple because most of the time, not much is known about the dreamer.
So it’s very understandable that my brief description wouldn’t connect very well with what you’re feeling about the image of the whales in the pool.
Lots of times, it’s even better to go with the feeling one gets and to forget about obtaining too much of an intellectual description of “what the image means”!
But since you asked, I’ll try to provide a few additional ideas about what the whales may signify.
For instance, you mentioned Moby Dick. Analyst Edward Edinger writes in “Melville’s’ Moby Dick”:
“What is the meaning of this mighty whale, the central character of the book? The problem is that the whale has too many meanings… The whale and its multitude of meanings becomes a Cretan labyrinth wherein one is almost sure to lose oneself…
The sea and the whale represent the primordial unconscious psyche which contains the aboriginal energies of life – numinous, awesome, terrible. The sea is the collective unconscious and the whales that inhabit it are its major contents, the archetypes. The green island surrounded by the sea is the ego, the structural order of consciousness.”
The idea is partly that while going through hard knocks and difficulties, an individual has to rend from the unconscious “whale” what he or she needs to survive, e.g. the “light of consciousness” as symbolized by whale oil which was used in lamps during the nineteenth century.
Moby Dick is “white”, that is, he is a sacred animal, something different from ordinary whales, in this case symbolizing the overall inherent potential for completeness and wholeness of the personality which must never be “destroyed” through an unfortunate ignorance or just plain self-destructiveness.
So this is perhaps another way of saying how you felt that the spiritual needs of people related to the dream were not being met.
Regarding Jonah, Dr. Jung writes:
“The golden haze of childhood memories arises not so much from the objective facts as from the admixture of magical images which are more intuited than actually conscious. The parable of Jonah who was swallowed by the whale reproduces the situation exactly. A person sinks into his childhood memories and vanishes from the existing world. He finds himself apparently in deepest darkness, but then has unexpected visions of a world beyond. The ‘mystery’ he beholds represents the stock of primordial images which everybody brings with him as his human birthright, the sum total of inborn forms peculiar to the instincts. I have called this ‘potential’ psyche the collective unconscious”.
After experiencing these powerful, healing collective images, the person can be “reborn” like Jonah who reappeared from the whale, bald like a baby.
To help explain more about whales as symbolizing archetypes, here are a few definitions regarding the meaning of “archetypes” as found in “Jung Lexicon” compiled by analyst Daryl Sharp:
“Archetype. Primordial, structural elements of the human psyche.
Archetypes are systems of readiness for action, and at the same time images and emotions. They are inherited with the brain structure - indeed they are its psychic aspect. They represent, on the one hand, a very strong instinctive conservatism, while on the other hand they are the most effective means conceivable of instinctive adaptation. They are thus, essentially, the chthonic portion of the psyche . . . that portion through which the psyche is attached to nature. ["Mind and Earth," CW 10, par. 53.]
It is not . . . a question of inherited ideas but of inherited possibilities of ideas. Nor are they individual acquisitions but, in the main, common to all, as can be seen from [their] universal occurrence. ["Concerning the Archetypes and the Anima Concept," CW 9i, par. 136.]
Archetypes are irrepresentable in themselves but their effects are discernible in archetypal images and motifs.
Archetypes . . . present themselves as ideas and images, like everything else that becomes a content of consciousness. [On the Nature of the Psyche," CW 8, par. 435.]
Archetypes are, by definition, factors and motifs that arrange the psychic elements into certain images, characterized as archetypal, but in such a way that they can be recognized only from the effects they produce.["A Psychological Approach to the Trinity," CW 11, par. 222, note 2.]
Jung also described archetypes as "instinctual images," the forms which the instincts assume. He illustrated this using the simile of the spectrum:
The dynamism of instinct is lodged as it were in the infra-red part of the spectrum, whereas the instinctual image lies in the ultra-violet part. . . . The realization and assimilation of instinct never take place at the red end, i.e., by absorption into the instinctual sphere, but only through integration of the image which signifies and at the same time evokes the instinct, although in a form quite different from the one we meet on the biological level. ["On the Nature of the Psyche," CW 8, par. 414.]
Psychologically . . . the archetype as an image of instinct is a spiritual goal toward which the whole nature of man strives; it is the sea to which all rivers wend their way, the prize which the hero wrests from the fight with the dragon. [Ibid., par. 415.]
Archetypes manifest both on a personal level, through complexes, and collectively, as characteristics of whole cultures. Jung believed it was the task of each age to understand anew their content and their effects.:
We can never legitimately cut loose from our archetypal foundations unless we are prepared to pay the price of a neurosis, any more than we can rid ourselves of our body and its organs without committing suicide. If we cannot deny the archetypes or otherwise neutralize them, we are confronted, at every new stage in the differentiation of consciousness to which civilization attains, with the task of finding a new interpretation appropriate to this stage, in order to connect the life of the past that still exists in us with the life of the present, which threatens to slip away from it.["The Psychology of the Child Archetype," CW 9i, par. 267.]”
As you touched on, the image of a house in dreams symbolizes the dreamer as a wider whole, including the ego, which changes according to current and unfolding circumstances.
Dr. Jung described his dream of a house as follows:
“I dreamt that I was in ‘my house,’ apparently on the first floor, in a cozy, pleasant drawing-room furnished in the style of the eighteenth century. I was rather astonished because I realized I had never seen this room before, and began to wonder what the ground floor was like. I went downstairs and found it rather dark, with panelled walls and heavy furniture dating from the sixteenth century or even earlier. I was greatly surprised and my curiosity increased, because it was all a very unexpected discovery. In order to become better acquainted with the whole structure of the house , I thought I would go down to the cellar. I found a door, with a flight of stone steps that led down to a large vaulted room. The floor consisted of large slabs of stone, and the walls struck me as very ancient. I examined the mortar and found it was mixed with splinters of brick. Obviously it was an old Roman wall. I began to grow excited. In a corner, I saw an iron ring in one of the stone slabs. I lifted it up and saw yet another narrow flight of steps leading down to a sort of cave which was obviously a prehistoric tomb. It contained two skulls, some bones, and broken shards of pottery. Then I woke up.
…The dream is in fact a short summary of my life— the life of my mind. I grew up in a house two hundred years old, our furniture consisted mostly of pieces about a hundred years old, and mentally my greatest adventure had been the study of Kant and Schopenhauer. The great news of the day was the work of Charles Darwin. Shortly before this I had been living in a still medieval world with my parents, where the world and man were still presided over by divine omnipotence and providence. This world had become antiquated and obsolete. My Christian faith had been relativized by my encounter with Eastern religions and Greek philosophy. It is for this reason that the ground floor was so still, dark, and obviously uninhabited.
…My intuition consisted in a sudden and most unexpected insight into the fact that my dream meant myself, my life and my world, my whole reality as against a theoretical structure erected by another, alien mind for reasons and purposes of its own.”
Regarding water, Dr. Jung says in the context of the disappearance of living symbols from most societies:
“That is why we have a psychology today, and why we speak of the unconscious. All this would be quite superfluous in an age or culture that possessed symbols. Symbols are spirit from above, and under those conditions the spirit is above too... Our unconscious, on the other hand, hides living water, spirit that has become nature”.
Anyway, I hope that these additional ideas will be helpful.
|
|
Bookmarks