 Originally Posted by Ctharlhie
^On the other hand, perhaps it is this automatic suggestion that is to be avoided, as it may lead exactly to blairbro's quasi-lucid scenario. The problem is that there is no way to empirically test the veracity of your memory in-dream short of waking yourself to confirm your recollection (an idea nobody here is keen on, I feel). This is a real Cartesian minefield (how do you know you do not dream of dreaming, and then dream of remembering your waking life, etc.?). I therefore suggest that the most fundamental gesture is the memory of a physical reality external to the dream (as has been suggested earlier in the thread) without opening the door to the obfuscations and gap-filling delusions of dream false memory which fogs lucidity. Of course, a semi-LD in which you falsely believe yourself to be sleeping in your childhood home is better than an LD in which you don't remember your sleeping body at all, and such a false memory could even prove a boon when attempting certain dream control tasks for the first time as an artificial confidence boost.
Isn't this what I have been saying pretty much since the OP? You are phrasing as if you disagree, yet I cannot find anything that runs contrary to what I've been saying. Except for this, and only slightly:
But for our purposes (ie. opening the door to advanced lucidity), I think the best practice would resemble Yuschak's "breaking down the wall" exercise posted earlier by Nfri - remembering, with the use of mnemonics or otherwise, certain particulars of the day.
I think that Yuschak was likely already fully accessing his memory while doing the exercise he outlines, else he would have been subject to the very problem that you describe above, and BlairBros described in his post: dreaming about recalling specific memories, with all those memories being wrong but fully accepted. It is a fine thing to remember specifics after you feel reconnected with memory, but the connection must be made first before you can confidently remember those particulars. And yes, that connection is certainly something that cannot be confirmed empirically; you must simply know you are connected (and you will).
So yes, as a tool for advanced LD'ing, memory is crucial, but that wall must already be broken before you can exercise the memory you've accessed.
And to agree with you one more time:
 Originally Posted by FryingMan
This is the approach I've taken, and in practicing this when awake I simply say "I realize my physical body is asleep out there in the waking world, and this dream experience is a fantasy taking place entirely in my mind" without demanding the specifics at first.
This might not be the best idea, FryingMan. Remembering to do your sleeping body check (guess we can't call it SBC yet, huh? Too soon? ) is better done after you have become lucid during a dream. Adding it to your day practice might result in what Ctharlhie already described, I think: you will build an expectation to remember your sleeping body, and that expectation might result in your unconscious obliging that expectation with completely meaningless but fully believed information (like what BlairBros experienced) about a dream-version of your sleeping body.
I think the closest I would come to waking-life focus on your sleeping body check is maybe setting an intention to remember to remember right before sleep. Otherwise, I suggest that you save the exercise for when you are lucid.
Finally:
 Originally Posted by Ctharlhie
It has occurred to me that this topic may be thought of as the mirror movement to stabilization as articulated in Mzzkc's stabilization fundamentals thread.
Though I am looking forward to Mzzkc's response myself, please remember that the topic of this thread is the importance of memory in general to LD'ing, and not about specific techniques for prolonging lucidity. The sleeping body check (and other checks described) was never meant to be the focus of this thread. I think it sort of emerged as a practical thing onto which people could grab, but the thread's topic itself is simply memory, and not stabilization or specific techniques. It is of course interesting and valuable to discuss these narrower uses of memory (once it is accessed), and perhaps the "general" discussion is fully played out, so I'm fine with the digression at this point, but I just wanted to make that clear.
|
|
Bookmarks