Thread: The Creationist Conspiricy

Originally Posted by PhilosopherStoned

I just figured it out! The creationists are trying to kill us by arguing in irrational circles until our heads explode! I was right. They are dangerous. And you thought I was crazy!

Well not all of them, just the fundies.

This whole forum would be a lot more chill if they just cut out RS.

I hate religious flamewars, even more than I hate commie/anti-commie flamewars.

And I really hate commie/anti-commie flamewars.

creationism is a fundie idea. If you believe in creationism, you're a fundie. Hate to break it to you. It really is like believing the earth is flat.

HAHAHAHAHAHA RELIGONl

I suggest you watch an episode of Metalocalypse called Religionklok. There's a part that explains atheism in what I think is a rather hilarious nutshell.

I was kidding Lezen
I'm more of an agnostic.

I'm more of a POTATO.

Originally Posted by Fableflame

I'm more of an agnostic.

So am I, I just can't understand why the pious get shat on so hard, which is why I appear to defend them so vehemently.

I believe in evolution.
more so than anything else, anyway.

Not that anyone cares but I have no freaking clue what I am! A third of the time i'm an atheist, the other third i'm agnostic, and the final third is diehard Christian.

Well, you could be an idiot, a schizophrenic, a pussy who doesn't want to pick a side or just this guy, you know?

(Hey, this is S/B after all )

I'm gonna go with all five of those rolled into one, also, potatoes are purple and taste like monkifyed cake nipples.

Originally Posted by Lëzen

I suggest you watch an episode of Metalocalypse called Religionklok. There's a part that explains atheism religionin what I think is a rather hilarious nutshell.

+10

I have that episode on my DVR

Originally Posted by A Roxxor

Well, you could be an idiot, a schizophrenic, a pussy who doesn't want to pick a side or just this guy, you know?

Schizophrenia is not the same as split personality.

Also, I'd sum it up with "confused".

Arguing instead that the universe emerged as the result of nothing (a causeless
effect) makes about the same amount of sense. To suggest that something
can come from nothing at all means you also have to believe that this
third-party entity that allegedly created everything might have come to
as the result of the same phenomenon. Arguing in dead ends doesn't seem that
much better than arguing in circles, does it?

[edit] Senseless. >_>

[edit2] Yarr

I'm cool with pirates. I even have a bunch of friends who are pirates. However, a lot of my Ninja friends are pretty vehemently opposed to pirates. I tend to stay out of the silly arguments they get into. Even though I am, myself, a Ninja at heart.

Originally Posted by Invader

Arguing instead that the universe emerged as the result of nothing (a causeless
effect) makes about the same amount of sense. To suggest that something
can come from nothing at all means you also have to believe that this
third-party entity that allegedly created everything might have come to
as the result of the same phenomenon. Arguing in dead ends doesn't seem that
much better than arguing in circles, does it?

[edit] Senseless. >_>

[edit2] Yarr

/thread

amirite?

Hah! Just found my thread. I thought they didn't move threads out of R/S. I guess it was pretty senseless though. Last time I start a thread stoned and spell it wrong

I pretty much agree with everything Invader said but it doesn't contradict my point in the least. I'm not making any claims about the universe or even the origin of life. Just how life evolves. That's settled science and doesn't need loops or dead ends.