Thread: 1 + 1 = 2

I present to you a picture of my proof:



I posted my proof before you! :O This is the result I got after an extensive study.

Know what the differences is? Mine's on a chalkboard, which makes it valid.

I'm sorry to disagree, but that is just completely not the truth. Oh man, how can you be so stupid? Just chalkboard won't do; you need a video of some serious-looking guy in a lab coat talking about serious-looking stuff with some very trippy background music.

But don't worry - as I said, I have the proof already, I'll be posting it soon.

Originally Posted by Kromoh

I have the proof

Wrong.

There is no such thing as a proof that 1+1 equals 2 for the simple reason that 1+1 doesn't equal 2. 1+1 obviously equals (dancing orange)

This is the proof that 1+1=

1. One, as a matter of fact, starts with a capital "o" at the begening of a sentence just as Orange does.
2. One ends with the letter "e" just like orange.
3. Since the word "one" starts with the begening of the word "orange" and ends with the ending of the word "orange, if you have two "one"s than you obviously end up with an orange.
4. This was never prooved by a REAL scientific, therefore, it is a crazy BUT a REAL theory of REALITY. Since it is first of all crazy, the orange must also be crazy
5. 1+1= does not use words, therefore the orange must have eyes.

ANOTHER PROOF IS THAT:

1. Oranges are the most juiciest fruit I can think at the moment
2. Oranges exist
3. It is more juicy to exist AND be the sum of 1+1
4. Therefore oranges have to be the sum of 1+1 or else they wouldn't be the juiciest fruit I could think at the moment.

Originally Posted by SleepyCookieDough

1. Oranges are the most juiciest fruit I can think at the moment
2. Oranges exist
3. It is more juicy to exist AND be the sum of 1+1
4. Therefore oranges have to be the sum of 1+1 or else they wouldn't be the juiciest fruit I could think at the moment.

I know where you took that from, and hell did I laugh hard

...erhm, I mean, of course I didn't laugh. Actually, I think your logic is wrong. I have the proof that 1 + 1 = 2, will be posting it any time now.

Originally Posted by SleepyCookieDough

Wrong.

There is no such thing as a proof that 1+1 equals 2 for the simple reason that 1+1 doesn't equal 2. 1+1 obviously equals (dancing orange)

This is the proof that 1+1=

1. One, as a matter of fact, starts with a capital "o" at the begening of a sentence just as Orange does.
2. One ends with the letter "e" just like orange.
3. Since the word "one" starts with the begening of the word "orange" and ends with the ending of the word "orange, if you have two "one"s than you obviously end up with an orange.
4. This was never prooved by a REAL scientific, therefore, it is a crazy BUT a REAL theory of REALITY. Since it is first of all crazy, the orange must also be crazy
5. 1+1= does not use words, therefore the orange must have eyes.

ANOTHER PROOF IS THAT:

1. Oranges are the most juiciest fruit I can think at the moment
2. Oranges exist
3. It is more juicy to exist AND be the sum of 1+1
4. Therefore oranges have to be the sum of 1+1 or else they wouldn't be the juiciest fruit I could think at the moment.

I have found more proof, the letter "n" is in the middle of the word "one" as well as the word "orange".

Originally Posted by Kromoh

I know where you took that from

I know you do since I took that from a recent topic on DreamViews (as you know)

Originally Posted by tnemrot

I have found more proof, the letter "n" is in the middle of the word "one" as well as the word "orange".

That's true! I am now conveinced that I am right... Let's see what Kromoh has to say to proove that the sum of 1+1 is 2. I'm pretty sceptical about that though... i really don't get how one plus one could equal two since one and two have no relation except the "o" which is at total opposite... Its like adding two girrafes and getting a light bulb. It has no logical sense. Does your proof has anything about Harry Potter because that would not be legimite proof.

I promise I have it, I will post it soon.

1 + 1 = 4.

Originally Posted by hellohihello

1 + 1 = 4.

That is twice the answer, so it must be twice as right!! You're a genius!!

ktromoh makes no sense never

Originally Posted by grasshoppa

ktromoh makes no sense never

No one has called me a genius before

Originally Posted by SleepyCookieDough

Wrong.

There is no such thing as a proof that 1+1 equals 2 for the simple reason that 1+1 doesn't equal 2. 1+1 obviously equals (dancing orange)

This is the proof that 1+1=

1. One, as a matter of fact, starts with a capital "o" at the begening of a sentence just as Orange does.
2. One ends with the letter "e" just like orange.
3. Since the word "one" starts with the begening of the word "orange" and ends with the ending of the word "orange, if you have two "one"s than you obviously end up with an orange.
4. This was never prooved by a REAL scientific, therefore, it is a crazy BUT a REAL theory of REALITY. Since it is first of all crazy, the orange must also be crazy
5. 1+1= does not use words, therefore the orange must have eyes.

ANOTHER PROOF IS THAT:

1. Oranges are the most juiciest fruit I can think at the moment
2. Oranges exist
3. It is more juicy to exist AND be the sum of 1+1
4. Therefore oranges have to be the sum of 1+1 or else they wouldn't be the juiciest fruit I could think at the moment.

Best post ever! ^o^

Hold your breath. The proof for 1 + 1 = 2 is about to come.





In no time, I promise.

if I hold 1 finger out with both hands that would mean that 2 fingers are being held out.

middle fingers.

Too bad I don't have two penises.

(grasshoppa asked for this)



Proof for 1+1=2 will be here any soon.

Originally Posted by Kromoh

Too bad I don't have two penises.

(grasshoppa asked for this)



Proof for 1+1=2 will be here any soon.

What about a circle jerK?

You're just doing this to watch DV go up in flames waiting. And may I point out that by definition, one is half of two and therefore 1+1=2 by the addition property?

I have the proof. As I said, Bennington, it will be here real son.

Originally Posted by SleepyCookieDough

1. Oranges are the most juiciest fruit I can think at the moment
2. Oranges exist
3. It is more juicy to exist AND be the sum of 1+1
4. Therefore oranges have to be the sum of 1+1 or else they wouldn't be the juiciest fruit I could think at the moment.

I hated this thread until I read that. Five stars!

Originally Posted by Mark75

I hated this thread until I read that. Five stars!

Why did you hate this thread?

Because of this

Originally Posted by Kromoh

I have proof, will be posting it soon.














.

and this

Originally Posted by SomeDreamer

I present to you a picture of my proof:



I posted my proof before you! :O This is the result I got after an extensive study.

Know what the differences is? Mine's on a chalkboard, which makes it valid.

and this

Originally Posted by Kromoh

I'm sorry to disagree, but that is just completely not the truth. Oh man, how can you be so stupid? Just chalkboard won't do; you need a video of some serious-looking guy in a lab coat talking about serious-looking stuff with some very trippy background music.

But don't worry - as I said, I have the proof already, I'll be posting it soon.

and this

Originally Posted by SleepyCookieDough

Wrong.

There is no such thing as a proof that 1+1 equals 2 for the simple reason that 1+1 doesn't equal 2. 1+1 obviously equals (dancing orange)

This is the proof that 1+1=

1. One, as a matter of fact, starts with a capital "o" at the begening of a sentence just as Orange does.
2. One ends with the letter "e" just like orange.
3. Since the word "one" starts with the begening of the word "orange" and ends with the ending of the word "orange, if you have two "one"s than you obviously end up with an orange.
4. This was never prooved by a REAL scientific, therefore, it is a crazy BUT a REAL theory of REALITY. Since it is first of all crazy, the orange must also be crazy
5. 1+1= does not use words, therefore the orange must have eyes.

and this

Originally Posted by Kromoh

I know where you took that from, and hell did I laugh hard

...erhm, I mean, of course I didn't laugh. Actually, I think your logic is wrong. I have the proof that 1 + 1 = 2, will be posting it any time now.

and this

Originally Posted by tnemrot

I have found more proof, the letter "n" is in the middle of the word "one" as well as the word "orange".

and this

Originally Posted by SleepyCookieDough

I know you do since I took that from a recent topic on DreamViews (as you know)



That's true! I am now conveinced that I am right... Let's see what Kromoh has to say to proove that the sum of 1+1 is 2. I'm pretty sceptical about that though... i really don't get how one plus one could equal two since one and two have no relation except the "o" which is at total opposite... Its like adding two girrafes and getting a light bulb. It has no logical sense. Does your proof has anything about Harry Potter because that would not be legimite proof.

and this

Originally Posted by Kromoh

I promise I have it, I will post it soon.

and this

Originally Posted by Kromoh

That is twice the answer, so it must be twice as right!! You're a genius!!

And especially this

Originally Posted by hellohihello

1 + 1 = 4.

and this

Originally Posted by grasshoppa

ktromoh makes no sense never

And especially this, too

Originally Posted by hellohihello

No one has called me a genius before

and this

Originally Posted by Abra

Best post ever! ^o^

and this

Originally Posted by Kromoh

Hold your breath. The proof for 1 + 1 = 2 is about to come.





In no time, I promise.

and this

Originally Posted by grasshoppa

if I hold 1 finger out with both hands that would mean that 2 fingers are being held out.

middle fingers.

and this

Originally Posted by Kromoh

Too bad I don't have two penises.

(grasshoppa asked for this)



Proof for 1+1=2 will be here any soon.

and this

Originally Posted by grasshoppa

What about a circle jerK?

and this

Originally Posted by Lord Bennington

You're just doing this to watch DV go up in flames waiting. And may I point out that by definition, one is half of two and therefore 1+1=2 by the addition property?

and this

Originally Posted by Kromoh

I have the proof. As I said, Bennington, it will be here real son.

Yeah. I think your view makes sense now.








[[insert huge 'not' here]]





The proof is here, I have it, will be posting it on any opportunity.

Originally Posted by Mark75

Because of this

and this

and this

and this

and this

and this

and this

and this

and this

And especially this

and this

And especially this, too

and this

and this

and this

and this

and this

and this

and this

You forgot this one.

Originally Posted by Mark75

I hated this thread until I read that. Five stars!

I have the proof, I am really close to disclosing it.