Wisdom Teeth

[greenhavoc]

[Marvo]

What a fucking terrible thread.

[Original Poster]

That is a fallacious load of bullshit. Not a single one accurately depicts the liberal perspective. They do not want more government, the worthless accusations that there's some "white guilt" involved are baseless and Dan Quayle was inept because he said some of the dumbest things ever heard by a politician predating GWB. Let's see what else. Mentioning God in public does not mean you're shoving religion down anyone's throats. But thanks for playing the victim you whiny bitch. Conservatives have got to be the biggest fucking whiners on the planet. Every fucking day its more bullshit about the war on christmas and the war on christianity. News Flash, Christianity is not the only religion that gets persecuted once in a while. Stop acting like the only fucking victims on the planet. The reason a muslim terrorist kills 10 "infidels" is because their country is being occupied, not because they hate our freedom or our religion. Actually fuck it, it might be, muslims are just as capable of religious zealotry and christians, and I don't pretend they're exempt from the same bullshit as christians just because they're being oppressed. I'm just saying it's more complicated than antagonizing christianity. Grow the fuck up. What else, what else... most of the judgment against Mitt Romney's religion is coming from the right, not the left. Because evangelicals think LDS is not Christianity, they think he's not christian. For the most part liberals think they're all just cults of a different title. A liberal has no more reason to judge a mormon than any other christian. Now that Mitt Romney has officially risen to Clone No. 2 everyone who attacked him before is defending him and acting like the left attacked him, projecting their cognitive dissonance in the true fashion of schizophrenia. Mitt Romney is exactly like Obama, I don't see how liberals could fathom attacking him on the basis of his religion compared to the crazy bullshit Santorum or Perry believed in. I guess all that's left to address is abortion, which isn't really worth addressing at all because the whole basis of the claim is fucking fallacious. I mean seriously do you conservatives really think women get abortions because their unborn baby pissed them off? Are you that fucking dense on the subject?

[greenhavoc]

The butthurt deniability clause wouldn't need to be implemented if you 2 children would just post some witty gop jabs, instead of acting like a couple of faggots. There are no sides here, in the land of wisdom teeth.

[Original Poster]

That's exactly what we should do, continue to invent the opponents claim and deepen the trenches between an already hopeless divided country. 99% of all political disunity in the US are rooted in people deciding what their opponents believe for them. I'd rather we strive for accuracy. I told you every fucking claim you pretended the liberals made is not actually what liberals made. Your chasing around strawmen and I don't see the point. But fuck it, I'll humor you

[Black_Eagle]

[greenhavoc]

Your chasing around strawmen and I don't see the point. You're confusing a possessive adjective with that of a contraction, and you would be able to see my point just fine if you'd stop pussyfooting around and let the checkout girl ring up your Preparation H, already. But fuck it, I'll humor you And humor me you have, some of those were funny.

[mcwillis]

I have my wisdom teeth in a small tin in my junk trunk, complete with little bits of mummified gum tissue.

[Burke]

Mine have been in my mouth for a year or two now and I don't feel any more wise. This thread certainly hasn't helped either.

[Original Poster]

[Supernova]

I cannot even codify how badly I want greenhavoc banned. Also this thread should be deleted.

[greenhavoc]

I cannot even codify how badly I want greenhavoc banned. Banned for what? Also this thread should be deleted. You're fine with the other 9000+ anti establishment threads, though. Seems like there might be a meme somewhere in that logic. re:

[Seroquel]

I cannot even codify how badly I want greenhavoc banned. Also this thread should be deleted. How about using derogatory words that offend the gay members of this community? I second the ban! Btw, wisdom teeth is the perfect name for this thread, as all my wisdom teeth have brought me is pain and annoyance.

[Patrick]

I cannot even codify how badly I want greenhavoc banned. My thoughts exactly. The fact that greenhavoc is alive is proof that a merciful god does not exist.

[Mindraker]

I cannot even codify how badly I want greenhavoc banned. For what, the fact that your political views do not coincide with his? The world is a harsh place. The whole point of Senseless Banter is that it is exactly that... Senseless Banter.

[Patrick]

For what, the fact that your political views do not coincide with his? The world is a harsh place. Because he only ever posts inflammatory things. The one that took the biscuit for me was when he posted a graphic picture of an aborted foetus without any spoiler tags, in a discussion about abortion. He enjoys offending people and is just gagging for a ban. So I would suggest giving it to him.

[Seroquel]

Because he only ever posts inflammatory things. The one that took the biscuit for me was when he posted a graphic picture of an aborted foetus without any spoiler tags, in a discussion about abortion. He enjoys offending people and is just gagging for a ban. So I would suggest giving it to him. Why did you click on this thread if you find him so "offensive".

[greenhavoc]

Because he only ever posts inflammatory things. The one that took the biscuit for me was when he posted a graphic picture of an aborted foetus without any spoiler tags, in a discussion about abortion. He enjoys offending people and is just gagging for a ban. So I would suggest giving it to him. I'm not trying to offened anyone, and that photo of a murdered child was completely on point, and within the context of that thread. Tell me something Patrick, how is it that a person like me never gets offended when idiots like yourself pass judgement, but when I post something that's near and dear to my heart, you and yours try an climb all the way up in my asshole about it? Are you really that much better for the site than I am, or is it that you're tired of loggin on to DV and talking to yourself in every, single thread? I mean, I'd blow my brains out if every person on this site was a carbon copy of myself. You keep looking in the mirror like that, and eventually people will start to laugh. You've been here since 05, I'd have thought you would have learned how to control your emotions a little better than this, by now. Now I'm going to have to ask you to please keep your hatred out of this thread before you get it locked. Thanks. re:

[Mindraker]

Because he only ever posts inflammatory things. The one that took the biscuit for me was when he posted a graphic picture of an aborted foetus without any spoiler tags, in a discussion about abortion. He enjoys offending people and is just gagging for a ban. So I would suggest giving it to him. I could post a cartoon of Muhammad, and to some that would be inflammatory. But to some that would be hilarious. The world is a highly subjective place. I'm not going to live my world by your subjective values just because you get all upset over a forum post. And I'm sure greenhavoc won't, either. Get a grip, and learn what really matters in life. Don't sweat the small stuff. There are lots of wars to fight out there, without having to snivel over trivialities.

[Supernova]

Banned for what? As long as I've been here I don't think I've seen you make a single productive post. You serve no purpose to this community. All you do is go around making negative comments, provoking arguments (i.e. this thread) and being an all-around troll. Plainly and simply, you are a pest. As far as this thread goes, I can't even attempt to point out every logical fallacy you've presented with these images (all of them coming from the same site, which I imagine is operating on around the same level as jesus-is-savior.com or godhatesfags.com), but just to humor you, let me examine a few: Completely invalid comparison. Unlike the first, the second does not lead to living people who have to suffer every day due to the various possible effects of fetal alchohol syndrome - in fact if anything the second will reduce the number of living people who suffer due to their circumstances, imagine that. This whole Christian victimization story is pretty weak. First off, conservative Christians don't want freedom of religion, they want freedom of Christianity, they don't give a fuck about the rest. It's ironic also that you should bring up theocracy, in that if anyone knows about that it's conservatives - allowing religious beliefs to influence public policy being an entirely theocratic idea, banning abortion and gay marriage seem to fit that description pretty well. Furthermore, the policy pursued by most liberals is one which makes room for all religions by denying Christians domination over the nation's religious environment and keeping religion out of public policy. I'm not exactly sure what point this is trying to make, but I can begin somewhere. Firstly, insinuating that someone who smokes pot, assuming Treyvon did, with druggies is indefensible. Secondly, I'm not sure where your idea of this situation is coming from, but there's some pretty healthy evidence which would illustrate him as a kid who was murdered at 17 avter being harassed by a gun toting overzealous wannabe-cop. In what sense is it anything but completely illogical to discuss humans in the same fashion in any way as wild animals? The whole point is that those bears won't end up homeless or struggling to feed themselves without a little help - possibly going on to commit crimes in order to stay in their homes or feed themselves. Ok, I'll admit, I suppose you could attempt to defend some of the others, but this is a cut and dry non-sequiter, and is therefore completely invalid. The first half is evolution theory, and the second is social darwinism. Ok, so you think one man, Michael Moore is a hypocrite. Your point?

[greenhavoc]

Banned for what?As long as I've been here I don't think I've seen you make a single productive post. You serve no purpose to this community. All you do is go around making negative comments, provoking arguments (i.e. this thread) and being an all-around troll. Plainly and simply, you are a pest. A quick search of my name in here would have prevented you from posting such an absurd comment. I'm not surprised, at all. As far as this thread goes, I can't even attempt to point out every logical fallacy you've presented with these images (all of them coming from the same site, which I imagine is operating on around the same level as jesus-is-savior.com or godhatesfags.com), but just to humor you, let me examine a few: Take away the liberal logic 101 moniker, and they're completely off point, right? Lol. You're not humoring me, by the way. You seem to think this thread is about me against you, but it's not. Nothing posted is un true, even Dei's memes, you just need to accept that and move on. I mean, I don't know what to tell you man, those sentiments aren't made up other than soley belonging to the progressive train of thought. Ok, so you think one man, Michael Moore is a hypocrite. Your point? A token of agreement, you see what I did there?

[MindGames]

Lol, it amazes me how immature adults can be. It's incredible how people actually buy into the endless propaganda they see on the news everyday.

[Nivv]

This prompted me to do a reality check.

[greenhavoc]

[Original Poster]

Propaganda at its best. Now apparently liberals are against homeschooling!