How much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood???
Give me all your answers! :D
Printable View
How much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood???
Give me all your answers! :D
The absurdity of it all has surfaced for the last time.I no longer have the patience for stupidity, and there is no mistaking it.
(2 chord of wood)
A woodchuck would chuck no amount of wood since a woodchuck can't chuck wood.
- -Barrett
A woodchuck would chuck as much wood as a woodchuck could chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood.
:wink:
Quote:
A woodchuck would chuck no amount of wood since a woodchuck can't chuck wood. [/b]
I said "if". hehe~~~
Chuck Norris's girlfriend once asked him how much wood a woodchuck could
chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood. He then shouted, "HOW DARE YOU RHYME IN THE PRESENCE OF CHUCK NORRIS!" and ripped out her throat. Holding his girlfriend's bloody throat in his hand he bellowed, "Don't fuck with Chuck!" Two years and five months later he realized the irony of this statement and laughed so hard that anyone within a hundred mile radius of the blast went deaf.
I always have to ask, how did Chuck Norris become such an internet novelty? The jokes are hilarious the absurdity, but I don't get why.
- -Barrett
Isn't that woodchuck thing in a Gary Larson cartoon?
17
...you said wood... heheheh
Yes, but, that's like saying:Quote:
Originally posted by Raven
I said "if". hehe~~~[/b]Quote:
A woodchuck would chuck no amount of wood since a woodchuck can't chuck wood.
"How many whole elephants could an ant eat if an ant could eat elephants?"
Totally absurd.
Now, an elephant, on the other hand, CAN chuck wood. And a LOT of it. Those things have damn strong trunks. Elephants can also eat woodchucks, chuck woodchucks, AND eat wood. They can't chuck ants, cos ants are too small, but, they can EAT ants. Use that big trunk to suck them uo like an ant-eater or vaccuum cleaner...
My point?
Elephants > Woodchucks
Who gives a f*ck about woodchucks anyway?
:? to blue meanie
Are you kidding!? Have you never eard of a little town in Pennsylvania called Punxsutaweny. These fine animals have the amzing abilty to predict the coming of an early spring! Are you campletlyforgeting about the MOSTimportant holiday of the year, Groundhogsday!!!!!!Quote:
Originally posted by The Blue Meanie
Who gives a f*ck about woodchucks anyway?
:mad:
No, I haven't heard of that little town. And what the hell's groundhogsday?Quote:
Originally posted by ledzeppelin
Are you kidding!? Have you never eard of a little town in Pennsylvania called Punxsutaweny. These fine animals have the amzing abilty to predict the coming of an early spring! Are you campletlyforgeting about the MOSTimportant holiday of the year, Groundhogsday!!!!!!
:mad:
Meh. A herd of elephants could so totally kick Punxsutaweny's ass. They could stomp the town to pieces, and pick up all the woodchucks with their trunks, chucking them long distances against trees untill all the little buggers are dead, then subsequently eating their battered corpses as they trod over the ruins of the town into the sunset.
Elephants > Woodchucks > Chuck Norris
I'm not going to lie, I was disappointed at the misleading title. :D
that is not even a rhetorical question but a exercise for annunciation and diction as like "she collects sea shells at the sea shore" or "in Spain it rains mostly on the plains".Quote:
Originally posted by Raven
How much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood???
Give me all your answers! :D
Quote:
Originally posted by Leo Volont
"in Spain it rains mostly on the plains".
dude you screwed that one up big time
its
"The rain in Spain stays mainly in the plain!"
-__-""" Yes. I know. But this is the senseless banter forum isnt it....Quote:
that is not even a rhetorical question but a exercise for annunciation and diction as like "she collects sea shells at the sea shore" or "in Spain it rains mostly on the plains".[/b]
TBM, you spent way too much time reading/responding to this thread. you lose.
Pffft. Quiet you! Shush, or I'll sic Dumbo on you.Quote:
Originally posted by Dangeruss
TBM, you spent way too much time reading/responding to this thread. you lose.
As for Groundhog's Day, there are no woodchucks! For all I know, woodchucks don't even exist! Now, I've seen a woodpecker (and I just stood there admiring it), but I ain't never seen no woodchuck!
Groundhog's day: Um.... on Feb. 2, a groundhog comes out from the ground and if he sees his shadow then there are six more weeks of winter coming. Whoever started it, I don't know, but I'm thinking a woodpecker had a go at him before he came up with that idea.
It is a Gary Larson cartoon:
http://images.google.co.uk/images?svnum=10...odchuck&spell=1
You can't get access to the larger image, but that peice of paper in the cartoon says that exact question that Raven asked....
Not clever.
i couldn't be sure, but i think that question has been around for far longer than the Far Side has. not to rip on the Far Side, because Gary Larson is awesome.
the initial question is missing the time factor
like, how much wood in a woodchuck's entire life?
male or female?
gaaaah, too many variables, the formula would look completely recockulous:
assuming we're talking about a woodchuck/groundhog (Marmota monax) from Missouri,
1-0-2-3 = 22 (tooth foormula) + A(B) + C(http://cwx.prenhall.com/bookbind/pub...lib/6m3q3q.gif)
1-0-1-3
where A = woodchuck life span
and B = woodchuck gender
and C = type of lumber
and P = pressure (pounds per sq inch)
source and source.
lmao but then you take the derivative then its intergral and you should get the answerQuote:
Originally posted by OpheliaBlue
the initial question is missing the time factor
like, how much wood in a woodchuck's entire life?
male or female?
gaaaah, too many variables, the formula would look completely recockulous:
assuming we're talking about a woodchuck/groundhog (Marmota monax) from Missouri,
1-0-2-3 = 22 (tooth foormula) + A(B) + C(http://cwx.prenhall.com/bookbind/pub...lib/6m3q3q.gif)
1-0-1-3
where A = woodchuck life span
and B = woodchuck gender
and C = type of lumber
and P = pressure (pounds per sq inch)
source and source.
Quote:
the article reports on the work of New York state wildlife expert Richard Thomas, who found that a woodchuck could (and does) chuck around 35 cubic feet of dirt in the course of digging a burrow. Thomas reasoned that if a woodchuck could chuck wood, he would chuck an amount equivalent to the weight of the dirt, or 700 pounds. We are pleased to know this, of course. But it sure isn't easy to fit into a snappy verse.
[/b]
oh cool you found the answerQuote:
Originally posted by docthory+--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(docthory)</div>if an integral is the same as an anti-derivative, then you've just gone in a circle and got the same numberQuote:
lmao * but then you take the derivative then its intergral and you should get the answer[/b]
ie. the derivative of X squared is 2X and the integral of 2X is X squared plus C SO WHAT IS THE FREAKING POINT GAVAN
<!--QuoteBegin-docthory
[/b]Quote:
the article reports on the work of New York state wildlife expert Richard Thomas, who found that a woodchuck could (and does) chuck around 35 cubic feet of dirt in the course of digging a burrow. Thomas reasoned that if a woodchuck could chuck wood, he would chuck an amount equivalent to the weight of the dirt, or 700 pounds. We are pleased to know this, of course. But it sure isn't easy to fit into a snappy verse.
omg. OB...you really went to do research.....