 Originally Posted by Sageous
^^ Pathetic indeed.
Frank, I think that if we all got on one knee and verbally genuflected to your brilliance (as a few here actually tried), and we asked thoughtful questions about your work (which some of us did), and we voiced our agreement with your ideas ... and why (which some of us did), you would still call us pathetic.
If you refuse to respond directly to us, Frank, you also lose the right to call us pathetic, I think.
What you think is not academically honest. Face it, your opinions and ideas are based in fraudulent physics psuedoscience meant to suppress the truth and your labeling Frank as pathetic when it is he that is being truthful is frivolous and callous in nature. You ought to be ashamed of the academic dishonesty you are representing the community as possessing, especially when Frank demanded it so clearly and nicely. Frank wanted only to be recognized for that which is undeniably the truth and as such anybody who disagrees must be lying because the truth is the truth and nothing but the truth. Anything else is lies. If you cannot see things this way then get out of the thread, you are only meaning to distort the truth with your quite honestly pathetic lies meant to shroud the minds of potential truth seers with things like observable facts and reason. For this reason, your opinion is not credible in the least and honestly you should just give up on life because you are only bringing the rest of us down. That is all.
Frank, you are truly a visionary. Your scientifically based conclusions are based entirely on reason and well-thought out, reasonable ideas and concept. On behalf of the community, please accept my apology.
|
|
Bookmarks