^^ Respectfully, Frank, you really ought to actually answer our questions, rather than simply cutting and pasting things you posted earlier.
No, the concepts of half-inertia and half gravity are not proven here, or in the other thread (or in any of the others). Neither was the concept of visible and invisible space (all space is invisible, because by definition space is nothing, and it is the objects occupying it that are visible). Simply announcing that something is proven, or repeating the words you already used, does not qualify as proof, I'm afraid.
You do understand that the force of earth's gravity is exactly the same when in orbit as it is on the ground, right? And that if you were not moving at substantial velocity around it, you would fall to earth with the same certainty and acceleration that you would if falling off a simple cliff? Plus, gravity and inertia, being forces of infinite value, do not have a "half." Are you speaking only of gravity relative to earth, and not the rest of the cosmos? If so, that seems quite limiting, cosmologically speaking. Are you simply saying that the equilibrium of inertia (that orbit velocity) and gravity causes a balance that is effectively half-gravity and half-inertia? If so, that is hardly earth-shattering news, I'm afraid.
I've asked before, and ask again now: are you speaking metaphorically, equating your half-gravity/half-inertia to the special equilibrium of reality perception that dreaming allows? Or, do you really believe that there are laws of physics that back your statements, laws that haven't yet been qualified? If you are waxing metaphoric, could you please explain those metaphors for us -- without cutting and pasting anything previously said?
Again, I ask these questions with all due respect, Frank, and I wish you would return that respect by responding with thoughtful answers rather than reprints of previous posts. I want to believe that you are on to something, and that you are not just another guy walking around in a sort of cyber-sandwichboard. Please work with us, Frank, or we will never understand your message.
|
|
Bookmarks