 Originally Posted by Xei
...no it isn't?
...yes it is? If you could simulate the interactions of all the molecules in a brain, then that would be very much a brute force approach.
Oh, cynical one, I know what you're thinking: but simulating molecules is no better than actually having a brain!
Yes, but we could probably go up at least a few levels of abstraction without losing anything. For example, if you have a robust set of rules for which conditions produced which proteins, you could avoid having to simulate protein folding. You could merely use a lookup table. Also, ion channels could be vastly simplified in software.
Even things like synapse growth could be simulated without actually reproducing the molecular-level interactions if you have a robust rule set for when a new synapse appears.
|
|
Bookmarks