Thread: For your own soul's sake, take off your clothes!

Preach it, brother! Preach it to all female sinners!

But that's icky.

What if it's cold where I live? Clothes are practical if it's goddamned cold. Am I sinning if I don't want hypothermia?

Originally Posted by Sekhmet

What if it's cold where I live? Clothes are practical if it's goddamned cold. Am I sinning if I don't want hypothermia?

Haha...

Strip clubs are centers of holiness. When I go to a strip club, it's all about God.

By the way, does God wear clothes? I don't think The Bible ever once mentions anything about God's clothing. He is naked, and he knows it. We are all being constantly watched by a naked man.

Originally Posted by Universal Mind

Strip clubs are centers of holiness. When I go to a strip club, it's all about God.

By the way, does God wear clothes? I don't think The Bible ever once mentions anything about God's clothing. He is naked, and he knows it. We are all being constantly watched by a naked man.

I'm glad to see someone else is picking up on what I'm preaching here.

Not only is our Lord God naked and watching over us, but he wants us to get naked too.

If God wanted to see his children running about in their birthday suits, he wouldn't have given us the gift of Shame. You should all be terribly disgusted by your bodies.

Originally Posted by Spartiate

If God wanted to see his children running about in their birthday suits, he wouldn't have given us the gift of Shame. You should all be terribly disgusted by your bodies.

But God didn't give us Shame, Adam and Eve inherited it when the Satan tricked them into eating from the tree of knowledge!
Shame is a direct result of Satan's meddling, thus is a sin! Do not be ashamed of your body!

Who wants to see a bunch of naked old people running around?

Originally Posted by Saturos

Who wants to see a bunch of naked old people running around?

It is not a matter of what you want, but what God wants.

Personally, having myself become, quite unaware as a matter of fact, a prophet (in training) I would think that between the two of us, me and God, God would have a much bigger mouth. So if It, whatever it was, wanted to stand on a soap box and preach non-sense, I would laugh at it, what ever it be, because believe it or not, It is not Holy because it is loved by God, it is love by God because it is Holy. What I have been told, by a fly as a matter of fact (or fiction, take your pick) that the whole idea of having a brain is to learn to use it. Now you can take your pick, learn judgment, or put words in Gods mouth, as if you have the hands to.

Now, try this on for size. If we are to become like "God" then it is up to us to "want." So I want me an Eve, with or without cloths--just as long as she actually has a brain. Either way, I can do the rest.

Originally Posted by Philosopher8659

I would think that between the two of us, me and God, God would have a much bigger mouth.

I'm not so sure about that.

Originally Posted by Mark75

I'm not so sure about that.

I said he had the bigger mouth, I on the other hand have more indiscretion

Originally Posted by Philosopher8659

Personally, having myself become, quite unaware as a matter of fact, a prophet (in training) I would think that between the two of us, me and God, God would have a much bigger mouth. So if It, whatever it was, wanted to stand on a soap box and preach non-sense, I would laugh at it, what ever it be, because believe it or not, It is not Holy because it is loved by God, it is love by God because it is Holy. What I have been told, by a fly as a matter of fact (or fiction, take your pick) that the whole idea of having a brain is to learn to use it. Now you can take your pick, learn judgment, or put words in Gods mouth, as if you have the hands to.

Now, try this on for size. If we are to become like "God" then it is up to us to "want." So I want me an Eve, with or without cloths--just as long as she actually has a brain. Either way, I can do the rest.

I actually kind of touched on the bit that I bolded.
If people would just use their brains, I wouldn't have to point out to them that wearing clothes is a sin. The would've figured that part out for themselves.
You however, do not seem to be using your brain. You say that you want an Eve, with or without clothes, as long as she has a brain.
I would much rather you get a naked Eve with no brain, then a clothed Eve, because a clothed Eve is doomed to hell, and her sinful ways may rub off on you.

How do you then account for the sins of nakedness in the Laws and the fact that the Angles are given white robes? Or that God even made and desgined clothes? Or did you tear those pages out of the Book?

And why not take it all the way? God did not create them in a house either, therefore it is a sin to live in a house, after all, a house is just looser fitting clothes. And damn, now I remember, they were not created with internet either! Man, your going straight to hell! And you gots lots of company--because heaven has a vacant for sale sign on it.

Myself, I would be under the impression that if a thing had a function, that the good was the virtue of the function, but the evil would be the dysfunction. However, fault is an entirely different matter as, the dysfunction of the eyes is evil, yet it may not be the fault of the blind--it is the fault of the eyes.


We are all thankful, however, of the number of people here on earth who are such intimates with whatever this God is, that they can tell you what is on his mind because He is too lame to tell us Himself. Kind of makes you special when you work for God, don't it? Those pages that help people identify a prophet, you will, however, definitly have to purge from the text. It is written there that one prophet would be sent, yet it appears that God cannot count for there are countless numbers of them.

I am certainly not up to working for anyone myself, but I do try to share the fruits of my labor--no charge, as I dont collect souls or butterflys. But now, I need to go and have a breakdown, contemplating what is going to happen to mankind should you actually read the entire text.

And as far as sin goes, I think it is written in several places in the text, I am Lucifer. This only means that I would rather have a woman who has lived in sin and came out with a strong desire for virtue, than one who is sinless with no desire at all. The one is life, and the other is not. Or how do you explain that the whore will eventually become the virgin? Is that not simply evolution for you?

Now, if there is anything you should have gotten out of Genesis 3 is not the latest dress fads, but the fact that Lucifer has and always will work with God--or so it is written.

1) He spoke in the name of the Lord.
2) What he said came to pass.
3) God confirmed his words.

Check the Law, what does that make him?

Originally Posted by Mark75

I'm not so sure about that.

Could God create a mouth bigger than his? If not, He is not omnipotent. If so, he is not mouthpotent.

This paradox troubles me.

Originally Posted by Philosopher8659

How do you then account for the sins of nakedness in the Laws and the fact that the Angles are given white robes? Or that God even made and desgined clothes? Or did you tear those pages out of the Book?

And why not take it all the way? God did not create them in a house either, therefore it is a sin to live in a house, after all, a house is just looser fitting clothes. And damn, now I remember, they were not created with internet either! Man, your going straight to hell! And you gots lots of company--because heaven has a vacant for sale sign on it.

Myself, I would be under the impression that if a thing had a function, that the good was the virtue of the function, but the evil would be the dysfunction. However, fault is an entirely different matter as, the dysfunction of the eyes is evil, yet it may not be the fault of the blind--it is the fault of the eyes.


We are all thankful, however, of the number of people here on earth who are such intimates with whatever this God is, that they can tell you what is on his mind because He is too lame to tell us Himself. Kind of makes you special when you work for God, don't it? Those pages that help people identify a prophet, you will, however, definitly have to purge from the text. It is written there that one prophet would be sent, yet it appears that God cannot count for there are countless numbers of them.

I am certainly not up to working for anyone myself, but I do try to share the fruits of my labor--no charge, as I dont collect souls or butterflys. But now, I need to go and have a breakdown, contemplating what is going to happen to mankind should you actually read the entire text.

And as far as sin goes, I think it is written in several places in the text, I am Lucifer. This only means that I would rather have a woman who has lived in sin and came out with a strong desire for virtue, than one who is sinless with no desire at all. The one is life, and the other is not. Or how do you explain that the whore will eventually become the virgin? Is that not simply evolution for you?

Now, if there is anything you should have gotten out of Genesis 3 is not the latest dress fads, but the fact that Lucifer has and always will work with God--or so it is written.

1) He spoke in the name of the Lord.
2) What he said came to pass.
3) God confirmed his words.

Check the Law, what does that make him?

Oh my God you are right!
This will be my last post on these forums. I am going to live in the wild with the animals that God originally populated this earth with.

Goodbye Dreamviews, it's been fun.

PS, don't forget to take a flashlight with you. They are excellent both for finding nymphs and snipes.

Oh, and the original animals, they died a couple days ago.

Originally Posted by Philosopher8659

And why not take it all the way? God did not create them in a house either, therefore it is a sin to live in a house, after all, a house is just looser fitting clothes. And damn, now I remember, they were not created with internet either! Man, your going straight to hell! And you gots lots of company--because heaven has a vacant for sale sign on it.

This "interpretation" of the Bible opposes clothes being worn for reasons of modesty, not for shelter from the environment. The OP's point was: don't cover up your body out of shame of being naked. I fail to see how houses and the internet became involved.

This is really random, but what exactly do you do for a living?

Originally Posted by horsey101

This "interpretation" of the Bible opposes clothes being worn for reasons of modesty, not for shelter from the environment. The OP's point was: don't cover up your body out of shame of being naked. I fail to see how houses and the internet became involved.

Are you sure you read the OP? My point had nothing to do with modesty or shame.
My point is clothes are evil, they are a direct result of Satan's trickery.

I think this rule only applies to women.
Amen.

This is why I hate religion.

Originally Posted by Mike02

This is why I hate religion.

I hope you realize that the OP isn't serious.

Originally Posted by Jesus of Suburbia

I hope you realize that the OP isn't serious.

What are you talking about?
I am completely serious.
My middle name is serious.
Seriously.