Why is that people like you and Ninja insist on tossing me your resumes?
Because it's pertinent when responding to claims like "this violates the laws of chemistry".

The fact that much of the specifics of abiogenesis are up in the air does not mean is is impossible.

perhaps with your expertise qualifications in Chemistry, you could help me better understand the following scenario.
I'm not a Geochemist, but I'll weigh in as best I can.

Your first link "Isotopic evidence for Mesoarchaean anoxia and changing atmospheric sulphur chemistry" isn't helpful to your case. Reading the full paper, it actually argues against the idea that the Earth had an oxic atmosphere (as posed elsewhere) and in favour of the idea of an early reducing atmosphere, by suggesting that observed results are down to UV fluctuations or atmospheric composition changes related to the trace gases. It's actually a rebuttal to the idea.

The evidence suggest that early Earth consisted of an environment rich with oxygen. So with that being said, I would like for you to explain how exactly can amino acids form within oxidized conditions?
Even if Earth's atmosphere did always contain O2, amino acids have been found in comets. The formation of those is itself explained by exposure to heavy UV light, instead lightning/electric currents as has been suggested how they could have formed on Earth if the conditions were right.


As for the rest of your links, I'm going to have to get back to you on that.