I think we can all agree on this.

[♥Mark]

Or should, anyway.

[really]

I disagree with it. If you don't approve of something, you don't need to aggressively vilify it. Trouble is, this man's primitive drive of aggression is contaminating his rationality for comprehension.

[Maria92]

I agree with it! Power to the old dude for standing up! It's about time someone did, anyway.

[Xei]

I like that guy very much. Faith is so often touted as something pure when really it is quite the opposite. Autonomy and freedom to make rational decisions are pure. Believing what somebody else tells you 'just because' has led to some of the worst atrocities in human history (I don't think I need to go into further detail here). I disagree with it. If you don't approve of something, you don't need to aggressively vilify it. Trouble is, this man's primitive drive of aggression is contaminating his rationality for comprehension. Yeah! I still don't understand why we didn't keep appeasing Hitler. wtf is up with that?

[DeathCell]

Aggressive religious or atheists equally suck.

[♥Mark]

I disagree with it. If you don't approve of something, you don't need to aggressively vilify it. Trouble is, this man's primitive drive of aggression is contaminating his rationality for comprehension. I think it's less about vilification as it is standing up for the right to call BS as it is and not letting it get special treatment simply because it's called religion.

[Photolysis]

I always hate how any atheist calling on religious BS is automatically aggressive. It's like the people using the label have no idea of what the word actually means. Using words in a free press, and freedom of speech in our society to correctly point out the evils of something is not aggressive. Aggression is seeking out a conflict, whereas this is merely a response. It also conveniently ignores the actual acts of aggression (you know, suicide bombs, wars, real aggression) that occur in the name of religion. Trouble is, this man's primitive drive of aggression is contaminating his rationality for comprehension. You talk such a load of shit, you know that? Because as we all know, using ironic and dark humour whilst correctly pointing out facts which REQUIRES COMPREHENSION is hugely aggressive. You try and sound smart but as usual, there's no substance. A typical post from a pseudo-intellectual.

[cygnus]

well that makes me feel better about my 'intolerance,' then. i had no idea about the blasphemy thing either - does anyone know more about that?

[Kromoh]

I'm in love with that guy.

[Xei]

It failed due to insufficient votes apparently. Not everybody in the UN is a wannabe totalitarian. There's some funny footage from CNN about it on YouTube where the reporter says, 'they want to pass a law banning the critisizing of any religions; including ISLAM.' And then the rest of the report is about Muslims. :l