I'd like to use Foreverlucid's recent comeback as an example for what I'm talking about.

He showed back up at DV and started posting threads revealing the "truth," which were all basically a collection of youtube videos he'd been watching. I guess the jist of his "discoveries" was that Satan himself, who's actually an alien, is behind the illuminati and etc... you know the story.

Aside from what he posted, he also participated in threads revealing some incredible radical, buttfucking wild views when it came to things like homosexuality.

He wasn't "duped." He learned from people that genuinely believed what they were talking about, because they found a way to rationalize their crazy ideas. That's the thing, you can call his views irrational, but what is rational? Anything can be rationalized, a hundred thousand theories can be made about the nature of who controls the world and they can all be argued in a rational, logical way.

But he was met with criticism, a lot of it by useless trolls that never bothered looking up his material because he gave off that crack-head vibe. Anyway, no one took him seriously, people ripped his shit to hell, and a thousand others that preceded him, coming here and posting their threads rationalizing world events in some bizarre way. People here either leave, start thinking more pragmatically, or they're just concerned about having the "right" answer.

Here is where I bring up the point of this thread. Project Avalon is a website meant for all the people organizing together to prepare for all the horrible world calamities coming upon us. Likewise, it draws in a lot of foreverlucids since most of the planning is being motivated by a bunch of unverified youtube videos.

The atmosphere is very friendly, everyone compliments each other on their posts and arguing is restricted. This is supposed to be desirable right? Everyone is supportive and listen's to everyone's ideas with an open mind... etc. The problem is, half the people there have been inducted into the lightworker police and make buttfucking wild posts. Even if someone says, "That's unverified" it's often not paid attention to. It's like everyone can catalyze each other's impractical thought processes and further solidify these radical interpretations of the world. Sometimes I wish I could just respond to a post, "What the fuck are you talking about, you're making absolutely no sense at all," but it'd get reported and I'd probably be warned.

So my point is, sure being supportive and open minded to other people is important, but "truth" must be tested in everyone. If you have something you claim as true, that idea should be forced out of your grip as hard is possible, it should be destroyed. Then, whatever remains after going through the incinerator, that's truth. Even better, it's truth you can argue over making you a catalyst to the changing paradigm. If you just ignore criticism, and hide your truth, then it helps nobody.

So what do you think, flaming good?