Thread: God is nature

We already have a word for nature. It's called "nature".

Well congartulations you are a idiot. What the diffrence between god and nature? Does god give us our food or does nature?

Why use "God" as a synonym for "nature", especially with all the many ways "God" can be misinterpreted in such a context? All it does is lead to confusion, whereas calling nature "nature" does not.

Originally Posted by Dreamhope11

you are a idiot.

priceless

The fact that nature implements a low-loss cycle that allows the ecosystem of the world to exist does not imply that it's "god"... Your argument starts with a false premise. I appreciate that we have such a well-balanced nature, but that doesn't mean we should worship it, though it DOES make more sense to worship nature than to worship a 2000 year old missing corpse.

god atheism theism ... god atheism theism ... god atheism theism ... god atheism theism ... god atheism theism

seriously don't you get bored of discussing these things ?... just go out and enjoy your life ...
(i'm pretty sure some retard is gonna ask me to define life in the above sentence)

Originally Posted by wa'el

god atheism theism ... god atheism theism ... god atheism theism ... god atheism theism ... god atheism theism

seriously don't you get bored of discussing these things ?... just go out and enjoy your life ...
(i'm pretty sure some retard is gonna ask me to define life in the above sentence)

You know that this is a religion discussion forum, right? If you have a problem with discussion of religion, you are in the wrong place.

No, I do not support the idea that nature is God. If you want to talk about nature then call it nature, do not confuse the issue.

nature takes in dangerous C02 Gases

Why is that third on your list? CO2 (not 02, you clearly do not have any understanding of chemistry anyway) is not dangerous, in fact without the gas there would be absolutely no life on the planet and it would also be completely inhospitable. It's not harmful to humans either...

C02 in small quantities is fine, but when you have gas guzzling veichles which spew out tonnes and tonnes of the stuff surely that can't be good, or am i wrong in saying that?

Again, it's CO2, not C02.

The O2 means the molecule has 2 oxygen atoms.

I know what it means i just type to quick.
O2 O2 Is my mobile phone provider

It can't be good that why nature gave us trees so we can carry on breathing and not choke to death from toxic air.

Not for nature as a whole. CO[O for Oxygen...]2 levels used to be vast in comparison to what they are now but the planet wasn't ridiculously hot like the media would probably have you believe, in fact it was rather similar. Maybe some crops will be negatively effected but really... I very much doubt the CO2 we're releasing is going to make much of a difference in the long run, it's not a major greenhouse gas and it's in minute quantities compared to more important ones like water vapour. Plus the fact is, we are going to use up all the oil. All of these attempts to curb climate change are completely futile because there's no way that we're not going to burn every last drop of oil on the planet.

It annoys me because it obscures the really really large threats to humanity; overpopulation, disease, the collapse of the energy industry, the holecene extinction event... these things are far far more important.

Originally Posted by Dreamhope11

C02 in small quantities is fine, but when you have gas guzzling veichles which spew out tonnes and tonnes of the stuff surely that can't be good, or am i wrong in saying that?

there's tons and tons of plants and people and animals in the world, more than vehicles i'm sure, they all produce co2 during respiration, so should we destroy all of them for it?

So we should not worry about greenhouse gases? Fine with me.
CO2 was made to breathed out not in, how long could you last in a room with just CO2 to breath on?

If god created nature then like you said, why did nature almost destroy all organisms? Surely god wouldn't want that, would he?

After all god must be one who created nature if he is the creator?

Originally Posted by Universal Mind

You know that this is a religion discussion forum, right? If you have a problem with discussion of religion, you are in the wrong place.

yea you're right ... though it should be more like: "kids discussing religion forum"

Originally Posted by wa'el

yea you're right ... though it should be more like: "kids discussing religion forum"

Do you have any on topic/religious points you would like to add? This is the religion forum, not the "I'm better than you" forum. Those are for kids.

Originally Posted by Universal Mind

Do you have any on topic/religious points you would like to add? This is the religion forum, not the "I'm better than you" forum. Those are for kids.

whatever man ....
kids are supposed to go outside, play sports, break their neighbor's window, stuff like that ....

this would really help reduce the number of retards and disturbed people later on ....