Thread: Is Astrology for Realz?

I keep telling you that I spend my whole life learning things. One of these things that I've learned is that not everything I've experienced can be easily rationalized, that doesn't mean I didn't experience them. It means I don't know one thing for certain about the universe.

According to your knowledge, dreams are fake, according to my clues, dreams are just a version of reality where I don't have to follow any rules because its my own private universe.

Another thing I've learned is everything changes, anything can change. The law of gravity can change, I don't know. Anything can happen, and anything is possible. Stop trying to fit everything into some lock down concept like it all has to make perfect sense in the universe. We write our existence as we live it.

So when's the rule that everything can change going to change?

It's not a rule, it's a smart assumption.

Originally Posted by Omnius Deus

I keep telling you that I spend my whole life learning things. One of these things that I've learned is that not everything I've experienced can be easily rationalized, that doesn't mean I didn't experience them. It means I don't know one thing for certain about the universe.

According to your knowledge, dreams are fake, according to my clues, dreams are just a version of reality where I don't have to follow any rules because its my own private universe.

Another thing I've learned is everything changes, anything can change. The law of gravity can change, I don't know. Anything can happen, and anything is possible. Stop trying to fit everything into some lock down concept like it all has to make perfect sense in the universe. We write our existence as we live it.

Laws of gravity can change? lolwut?

However, you still have knowledge, therefore by your reasoning, you are locked down already. You try to use different words to try to differentiate your position, but it still screams knowledge.

A snake couldn't slither around things as much as you do.

Originally Posted by Omnius Deus

It's not a rule, it's a smart assumption.

An assumption based on what? Anecdotes?

...okay, you 'assume' that everything is going to change. That doesn't make any difference.

If that's so, then the tendency of things to change will also change.

Do some research on string theory. Our whole existence is composed merely of tiny, invisible strings that can be plucked in certain ways to generate the world around us, in metaphor. The lower the vibration, the more solidified, and the more something materializes. However, they can be plucked in an infinite amount of different ways and combinations. Existence can be absolutely anything, dependent merely on the will of the particles that surround us.

And it is my belief these particles contain consciousness.

And on an infinite timeline, logically everything is impermanent in the big picture.

Furthemore, physicists admit that in studying the beginning of the universe or the big bang, they realized all theories of physics break down. Mathematical equations apparently created themselves as the universe developed.

I can keep going. Physicists still don't completely understand gravity. Gravity in itself is an incredibly weak force, abiding by a universe mathematical law of acceleration. Meanwhile, they invented Dark Matter and Black Holes to explain gravitational forces that don't fit into the equation correctly. Watch "Thunderbolts of the Gods" if you want the real explanation of these forces. It's available of Google.

Age old equations are now being solved by including parallel dimensions in the theories, which seems new but actually Eastern scholars have been saying we exist in multiplie dimensions all the time. We already exist in 3 dimensions at once, but of course now the winning theory is actually we exist in 11 dimensions at once.

Look up M theory, if you want a better explanation of multiple dimensions.

These are not fringe theories or new age theories, these are the developments of real singularity. Not just realizing that everything in the universe exists as one entity, but ancient eastern philosophers had ideas that are now making sense to cosmologists and physicists. New agism, as you call it (or we could call it what it actually is, which is studying the ideas of the greatest phislosophers of prehistory), and the most advanced thinkers in the field, are beginning to come to the same conclusions.

It's been said the mind is the universe, that in studying the mind one can understand the entire universe.

Originally Posted by Omnius Deus

Do some research on string theory. Our whole existence is composed merely of tiny, invisible strings that can be plucked in certain ways to generate the world around us, in metaphor. The lower the vibration, the more solidified, and the more something materializes. However, they can be plucked in an infinite amount of different ways and combinations. Existence can be absolutely anything, dependent merely on the will of the particles that surround us.

And it is my belief these particles contain consciousness.

And on an infinite timeline, logically everything is impermanent in the big picture.

Furthemore, physicists admit that in studying the beginning of the universe or the big bang, they realized all theories of physics break down. Mathematical equations apparently created themselves as the universe developed.

String Hypothesis is simply mathematics. Very nice maths, yes, but still maths. It, unfortunately for you, has little going for it in terms of evidence. Hence why I used the word hypothesis as opposed to theory.