once and for all

what Minerva is trying to say is

1+1+1+1+1 = 5 = pie = 4 = 2+2
therefore 5= 2+2

We assume that the above statement can be believed (point of this thread), but the logic is flawed.
What's been happening for the majority of the thread, however, is she's been trying to use maths to prove that, which consistently fails because the logic of the first statement is false.

Let me say it one more time

FALSE

Maths works on circular definitions and hence can't be looked at in any other way. It's objective, end of story.