 Originally Posted by Mario92
Why do you let it? Most women don't really care, and studies have shown that male orgasms typically differ by very little. If it really bugs you, there is something called foreskin restoration that'll fix it right up.
I appreciate the sentiment and don't mean to thread hijack. Unfortunately, this misconception has been debunked by modern science. Plus - I - care.
Up to 60% of the sensitive nerves involved in pleasure and tactile control are completely removed forever. It isn't just skin, its where most male sensation actually resides, and where much of the intimacy of lovemaking occurs, which is about much more than finally orgasm. The procedure you talk about I have looked into, and it just puts plain skin over it which is essentially just making things worse, more unnatural, and is just really gross in general.
I seriously wonder what religious lunatic ever imagined doing such a thing was a good idea, or what doctor with any integrity in their Hippocratic oath would not see amputating the primary sexual function of a defenseless child, removing what nature evolved over millions of years, was somehow "not doing harm."
I would suspect it was more about forcing you to suffer in sex except for puritanical "sex is evil" procreation, and to create defeated slaves, as is most of that horrible religious crap mankind still suffers with. I find it telling we so readily condemn a similar mutilation performed on infant girls in third world countries, yet close to 80% of America babies had this done to them as recently as the 1980s.
Sorry, again. I just don't have anyone I can talk to about it. And while girls might not care, my fiance certainly noticed. It is what inevitably caused us to drift apart. I'm glad for those who are able to overcome and find some peace in spite of what these despicable tyrants do to us every day, as infants who can't even defend themselves.
Back on topic... Hey, this post was actually an answer to the OP! Because I feel like I already am... And this is what I'm saying.
|
|
Bookmarks