 Originally Posted by Sekhmet
Source, plz.
Aah, ya got me. I didn't provide a source, therefore I made it up 
j/k. Seriously though, it's been several years, so I probably wouldn't be able to locate that article. But here's one that cropped up:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/liv...icle_id=446315
Of course, I think it's safe to expect a pretty huge deviation. On wikipedia, there's a much lower number. Another place I googled referenced a PBS survey that stated the average daily income was $56, ranging from $15 to $100 or so. Again, I searched for that particular one on pbs' site, but could not find it.
But here, let's make an estimate: Let's say you're a beggar and you beg one person every 18 seconds. That's a lot of time to say "got change?" That's 200 people in one hour. If 10% of them give you a quarter, that's $5 an hour. If you're also getting a cheque from the government, then that puts you above minimum wage, easily.
"A friend of a friend of mine said... and since I no nothing of the circumstances that person is in, it must be true!"
And there is something to that story that you are purposely leaving out, or just don't know about. It seems unlikely that a person who is homeless can go straight from the street to buying a home. There is no social assistance in the world that provides the amount of money to do so. Sounds like a bunch of bullroar to me.
What I left out was what can be inferred: This person wasn't homeless. She was renting. Also, I wasn't making the point that she COULD buy a home, just that the notion of giving up the free money trumped the obvious "can't afford" answer, which really surprised me. I realize that's more anecdotal than a formal study, but it irks me everytime someone asks me for change, and I can see their ipod sticking out of their pockets. Just to be pre-emptive: NO, I am NOT saying that's everyone. But it happens enough to me that I notice.
I don't even know how to respond to this ignorance. Yes, let's set up a pre-determined list of conditions in which all homeless people must be pigeonholed, regardless of the multitude of circumstances relevant to each thinking, feeling individual, otherwise they can just fuck off and live in misery because it is not worth our time to try and understand why anyone would seemingly "choose" to live in poverty, insecurity, and hopelessness.
It's just an idea. Instead of getting all riled up, feel free to provide an alternate solution. I'm all ears. You might notice, for one, that I didn't specify said conditions. Maybe the opportunity can be freely offered to everyone, and the ones that actually take it are the non-lazy ones (barring medical issues). Then, they're dictating their own conditions for whether they're lazy, based on whether or not they go for the reachable (but non-zero-effort) fruit that's being all but handed to them. You say to everyone who will listen, "Here's an introductory job... it's not going to be fun. You're going to be shoveling shit all day. In return, you get salary, a discount on living expenses, and a fresh start." I'd actually be very interested to see who would take it and who wouldn't.
Also, just so you don't get the wrong impression, I'm not saying they're bad people. And while I don't give them money, if they ask for money for food, and I happen to have groceries, I'll offer an apple or two. Sometimes they take it. Other times, they say "no, I only take cash."
|
|
Bookmarks