 Originally Posted by JCee
Reading and believing the Bible.
I find that many people will use the Bible as a direct reference for their reasoning and morals. Christians alike follow and interpret many of the Bibles passages to support a paramount of ethics. However, there are several problems with this:
Firstly, this is an incontrovertable fact; God himself did not write the Bible. There is no signature from God or any indication that God himself wrote the very words in the Bible. Thusly, if a person did replicate the words from God and wrote them down, then they are not the words of God but the replication and interpretation of Gods words written down by human beings. Further, if you make the step to say that a human's words are just as good as God's - then we must simultaneously accept that humans physical limitations are also evident in God.
Secondly, the Bible has been translated and manipulated many times. Consider that the modern Bible's ommit many passages and books. For example, the Book of Mary Magdalene is not included within any Bible - why? Also, consider that in 325, at the Council of Nicaea, they edited and changed the Bible's contents for modern readers. It was the very purpose of the council. It was again modified in 787. Furthermore, Paul purported his version of the bible that were revealed to him by Jesus - but not Jesus' physical manifest self. Moreover, Saint Jerome translated the Vulgate from Hebrew and Greek.
Thirdly, if you are to reference the Bible for anything, then you must be prepared to accept all of the moral reasoning within the Bible. Consider that in Exodus 21:7 and thereafter, they fervently adhere to the selling of your daughters. Questionable passages from the bible are ubiquitous (ie. a man can rape a woman and merely have to pay 22 sheckle). While people make references to the absurdity of homosexuality, they neglect these certain parts of the Bible.
Most importantly:
1 Corinthians 11:14
"Does not nature itself teach you that if a man wears long hair, it is degrading to him"
+ Remind you of any J.C. figure...?
Thus, if you reference the Bible as the foundational crux of your belief system, there are many objectional arguments which you must be prepared to answer. Namely, the translational problems (keep the telephone-game analogy in mind with this), universal acceptance of the bible, and political implications of the bible.
Furthermore, "dying for our sins" is problematic as how did he pay for the sins? Is this equivalent to me lending you $20 to pay me back? If he conclusively died along with all possible sin, then how are we still able to sin? If he died to pay Satan, then why did God send him in the first place? Also, does not the bible say that Jesus is the son of man not the son of God? This was originally the way things were prescribed but changed over time just along with the body of Mary being somehow projected to heaven whereas it never says anything about Mary's death in the bible at all! However, tradition has solidifed it as truth via Pope Pius who claimed, "It was revealed to me." So we have to dogmatically throw away all rationality and reason in order to believe in him.
However, we can say the samething in order to believe in Zeus, Zarathustra, or a flying spaghetti monster - "You just have to believe in it in order to understand it".
Just thought I would throw that in there as I do not advocate the bible as any grounds for self-proving arguments. It is just as good as me saying, "I believe Darwin is correct about evolution because the Origin of Species says so."
~
|
|
Bookmarks