Thread: Declaration of Independence, a list of grievances

Originally Posted by Sandform

? If everyone were the same religion, and that religion wasn't hypocritical and did not act as a terrorist by threatening eternal punishment for being "evil", and did not have rules over unimportant things that are "bad" by its standards but if you think about it logically you realize it is of no consequence.

im saying if religion only promoted love and peace among human beings than i dont think it would need consequences to stop people from committing crimes.

Originally Posted by Matt5678

im saying if religion only promoted love and peace among human beings than i dont think it would need consequences to stop people from committing crimes.

Well its a shame that that doesn't happen though, since we all have evidence that religion tries to promote what your speaking of, while at the same time shuns any who do not follow exactly to its according of doctrine. Not even that they shun those not of the religion, but those who are odd, or different from its decided rules. It thus breeds hate in those who follow any religious doctrine. Non consequental crap is the fundamental root of all religion.

I can't see it happening.

Your examples of throwing out of thor, Odin, Zeus etc were all actually just replaced by another religion.

The problem is there is no way you can stop what is in human nature.

People want there to be a higher power. This want is inherent, and no amount of nurture can get rid of it; so whatever happens religion will pop up all over the place. If we're at the state where we should have to quell these as they pop up.. I don't know, it sounds vaguely tyrannical itself.

I'm an atheist, btw (y)

Originally Posted by Sandform

Well its a shame that that doesn't happen though, since we all have evidence that religion tries to promote what your speaking of, while at the same time shuns any who do not follow exactly to its according of doctrine. Not even that they shun those not of the religion, but those who are odd, or different from its decided rules. It thus breeds hate in those who follow any religious doctrine. Non consequental crap is the fundamental root of all religion.

oh come on, your telling me that there is not a single priest or a single Christian or jew or Muslim who loves their neighbor and tries to help people regardless of what name they call god..if any.

Originally Posted by Sandform
Well its a shame that that doesn't happen though, since we all have evidence that religion tries to promote what your speaking of, while at the same time shuns any who do not follow exactly to its according of doctrine. Not even that they shun those not of the religion, but those who are odd, or different from its decided rules. It thus breeds hate in those who follow any religious doctrine. Non consequental crap is the fundamental root of all religion.

Originally Posted by Matt5678

oh come on, your telling me that there is not a single priest or a single Christian or jew or Muslim who loves their neighbor and tries to help people regardless of what name they call god..if any.

Yaa, I am sure he meant, EVERY SINGLE ONE of them!

It is soo hard to make any opposing discussion without being accused of generalizing.
But at that risk; Why do so many people become born again Christians? For their unrighteous behavior that they now can find repentance.
Many use religion because they know that they are safeguarded from the mistakes that we will ALL make, and make often.

Hate may be a strong word. But what do religious people consider gay people for example? Or "odd or different form the decided rule?"
They would let the devil or death have them. That seems pretty hateful, even if they do not want to admit it. OR even if they shun them and let the chips fall where they may, the same result. They just don't have to feel the guilt then.

I find that no human should be the object of direct hate. Hitler for example, he was the cause of HORRIBLE things, but, who here would send him to an eternal torture? And if you did say, for example, that he did deserve such a place, well YOU are only human, YOU are not perfect, YOU are capable of flaw...however supposedly God is not imperfect nor capable of flaw, therefor it stands to reason that the ONLY person who anyone can ever truelybe capable of evil, since all humans are imperfect, is God himself...but since I see no evidence of any Gods or gods, then I see no evidence of true evil, merely ignorance.

oh come on, your telling me that there is not a single priest or a single Christian or jew or Muslim who loves their neighbor and tries to help people regardless of what name they call god..if any.

If they do, it is because they have risen ABOVE their religion. All religion promotes hate just as much, if not more than, kindness. By prying on peoples prejudices, and fears, and HOPES, religion has gained power amongst the masses.

What more the ultimate punishment than hell? What more the ultimate bribe than heaven? Where in life have we ever exhibited such things to be true? There is no where that we have seen the good be given ONLY good things, and the evil be given ONLY evil things, quite the contrary I would believe.

Originally Posted by Sandform

Well its a shame that that doesn't happen though, since we all have evidence that religion tries to promote what your speaking of, while at the same time shuns any who do not follow exactly to its according of doctrine. Not even that they shun those not of the religion, but those who are odd, or different from its decided rules. It thus breeds hate in those who follow any religious doctrine. Non consequental crap is the fundamental root of all religion.

Such does seem to be quite a problem and quite a distraction form the core teachings present in most all "religions".

What are those core teachings?

What is it tha the follower of Advaita knows?

What is it that the practitioner of Dzogchen knows?

What is it that the follower of Gnosis knows?

What is it that the Sufi knows?

What is it that the follower of the Kaballah knows?

What is it that the follower of the Tao knows?

Do you know?

The problem with doing away with religion is that you end up throwing the baby out with the bathwater, so to speak.

Originally Posted by NonDualistic

Such does seem to be quite a problem and quite a distraction form the core teachings present in most all "religions".

What are those core teachings?

What is it tha the follower of Advaita knows?

What is it that the practitioner of Dzogchen knows?

What is it that the follower of Gnosis knows?

What is it that the Sufi knows?

What is it that the follower of the Kaballah knows?

What is it that the follower of the Tao knows?

Do you know?

The problem with doing away with religion is that you end up throwing the baby out with the bathwater, so to speak.

It becomes a problem when philosophy is used in place of religion. Gnosis. I had never heard that term before, and I've only briefly been introduced to the others. Is it not merely knowing that spirituality exists? I would imagine since it seems to share spelling with agnostic that would be the basis of agnosticism? I would like to know more... But as far as I have seen, these religions, aside from having silly rituals, are more philosophical than religious.

But still, regardless, it stagnates society when you cease to look for evidence of answers. Which is what religion will do, no matter which religion. It is only when you question the validity of the answers that have been provided, where they come from, and why they were said, do you find true answers. Why ask how we got here if religion will give you answers from no where? Why ask what is the meaning of life if the religion will tell you? Why live if religion tells you your purpose? Religion is a flawed system.

I will stand by my statement that nonconsequential crap is the root of all religious practice.

Originally Posted by Sandform

It becomes a problem when philosophy is used in place of religion. Gnosis. I had never heard that term before, and I've only briefly been introduced to the others. Is it not merely knowing that spirituality exists? I would imagine since it seems to share spelling with agnostic that would be the basis of agnosticism? I would like to know more... But as far as I have seen, these religions, aside from having silly rituals, are more philosophical than religious.

Gnosis is out of early Christianity. Gnosis has nothing to do with agnosticism as far as I am aware of.

All of the above are buried within their respective "religions". The religions are a man made covering over these teachings, a covering relating to egotism.

All of the above embody the teachings of Non-Dualism or the Oneness of all that is.

But still, regardless, it stagnates society when you cease to look for evidence of answers. Which is what religion will do, no matter which religion. It is only when you question the validity of the answers that have been provided, where they come from, and why they were said, do you find true answers. Why ask how we got here if religion will give you answers from no where? Why ask what is the meaning of life if the religion will tell you? Why live if religion tells you your purpose? Religion is a flawed system.

There is little to argue with on these points. Religion is flawed., flawed by duality and the egotism that goes with it. However, flawed that it is it does posess a certain necesity. So long as dualistic perception exists religion must exist in one manner or another for those who are locked into the duality. Religion does provide basic laws and morals necesary for life as such, as well as being the covering for the teachings of non-duality buried within.

The object is not to attack religion, but to simply let go of it and move on into the teachings at the heart of it, covered and buried within.

I will stand by my statement that nonconsequential crap is the root of all religious practice.

You did not say "practice" before. This time you did. No argument here as so worded. I would say as to the root of religion itself, it would be the teachings of Non-duality, which have been lost and forgotten by the majority of the followers of all these religions in favor of the "practices" that have become the standard of the day.

So basically, you're all for religious persecution; but unlike those who would persecute many religions but condone one, you want to top them all and persecute everyone? I can't exactly call you a Nazi because Hitler at least allowed some people to practice their religion. You've managed to out do the Nazis with your gross generalizations and blanket accusations. Good job.

The worst part of this whole charade is you most likely haven't actually lived through any real religious persecution anyway. You're a citizen of the U.S. so you have no fear of the government putting you to death because of your beliefs (or lack thereof). Your country hasn't been torn apart by religious wars, you haven't been been branded and ostricized or humilitiated in public. You sound like an angry little kid who hasn't found God and therefore hates anyone who has.

Why is it that you want the world to be a bland homogenous soup, in which every individual is indistinquishable from the next?

Originally Posted by Xaqaria

Why is it that you want the world to be a bland homogenous soup, in which every individual is indistinquishable from the next?

A world without religion would not be a bland homogenous soup. Freeing people from ignorance and superstition is a good thing. Freedom from religion should be a right.

Originally Posted by Xaqaria

So basically, you're all for religious persecution; but unlike those who would persecute many religions but condone one, you want to top them all and persecute everyone? I can't exactly call you a Nazi because Hitler at least allowed some people to practice their religion. You've managed to out do the Nazis with your gross generalizations and blanket accusations. Good job.

No because I'm not saying FORCE religion out, I'm saying appeal to peoples logic until everyone finally realizes that religion is not necessary, regardless of if any religion is true, religion is an unnecessary evil, and diverts attention from doing things of actual good in the world. Ironic though that may seem.

Originally Posted by Xaqaria

The worst part of this whole charade is you most likely haven't actually lived through any real religious persecution anyway. You're a citizen of the U.S. so you have no fear of the government putting you to death because of your beliefs (or lack thereof). Your country hasn't been torn apart by religious wars, you haven't been been branded and ostricized or humilitiated in public. You sound like an angry little kid who hasn't found God and therefore hates anyone who has.

Ok Xaqaria, I've lost the respect I used to hold for you. I used to at least appreciate your words when you would speak them, because they at least had some thought behind them. Mostly I'm speaking of your create your own god theories. But now I'm done. Don't you dare presume to know what I have been through. You don't even have a clue how many religious zealots exist in this world. I've been abused by these little bastards physically and verbally so don't bother trying to sell what your saying to anyone.
Of course, I will concede, I cannot say that it is the fact that I am an atheist alone that caused this, there are many other things that trigger religious nuts.

Yes I was born in the U.S. and am therefor lucky enough not to be in some hell hole where the government is run by a theocracy in which people are not persecuted for worshiping a god, but rather in not worshipping the "right" god. Am I sorry I was lucky? Not unless it would have meant someone else could be free of tyranny instead of me.

Originally Posted by Xaqaria

Why is it that you want the world to be a bland homogenous soup, in which every individual is indistinquishable from the next?

No, I want ignorance to disappear. Like I have said, regardless of if (any) religion is true, it is unnecessary and only diverts attention from more pressing matters. If we took away religion and replaced it with lets say...care for the elderly we would have billions of dollars and man power to increase the quality of life for those who are soon to die. Thats just one example.