 Originally Posted by Sandform
That's not true at all, I offer no answers, I do the opposite, I denounce answers. Saying that I am doing something does not make it so. I declare that I do not know everything. Human beings, with all we have learned so far, are still in the dark ages compared to what there is to know in the universe. Your only trying to make me sound like you so that you can nit pick me about it, which is rather poetic irony if you think about it. One thing beyond all things is true, regardless of anything else, compassion is the important force in human society, it is why we have progressed as a society, and it is why we continue to grow, not some spiritual bull shit. That and along with just being genetically more capable than other animals. I am simple saying that it is better to say "I don't know" than it is to say "I've been taught" when they can not provide evidence of any kind that points to the answers that one might give. The world would be better off without religion for the reason that once we get rid of the foolish idea of the "afterlife" and some "wrath" for evil deeds, we can start studying the universe without ignorance, and we can benefit society without having to worry about "ethics" that are based off of some "benevolent" being rather than logic and compassion.
As much as you deny it, he is right. Your beliefs are based off of what you have been taught just like everybody else. How much of science have you actually witnessed for yourself and how much scientific evidence do you take on faith because someone with a degree has said it is the truth? What you don't seem to realize is, even scientific explanations of the world are based on personal interpretations of the evidence. You may say "I don't know" and feel self righteous because of that, but there are beliefs that you hold and they are based mostly on what you have been told whether you admit it or not. Because you have been told one thing and not another does not make you any better or worse than anybody else.
 Originally Posted by Moonbeam
Not that again. You don't know the definition of the word "religion". Is not believing in Santa Claus a religion? No. Atheism is the same way.
It is a belief system. It is a world view. It is an assumption of the truth that is based largely on speculation. In these ways it is similar to religion. Science is put forth as the ultimate truth instead of a metaphysical entity; that is the only difference.
 Originally Posted by Carôusoul
I'm an atheist merely because I don't believe in a God.
This in no way effects my way of living. I don't try to attract followers.
The reason I am an atheist is simply because I believe what is rational and in front of me.
Religions generally require faith of some sort.
Atheism doesn't.It merely requires logical rational thinking.
Rational reasoning; is by no means a religion. It's just true, I'm afraid.
Atheism is similar to religion in that its followers believe they are closer to the truth than all others. Why is it that your beliefs are based in rational truth and mine are not? What research have you done to be so convinced that you are more knowledgable than I am about the inner workings of reality? I have studied physics, chemistry, biology, and philosophy and these things have lead me to a different conclusion than you. It is likely that I have followed a route that is more logical and based more on empirical evidence than you have and yet you say I am irrational because our beliefs are different. The fault that most find in religion is intolerance and the inability to identify with other people's beliefs. This is something that you are guilty of also.
|
|
Bookmarks