 Originally Posted by Xaqaria
My biggest issue with what you have is on the one hand you point to the fact that morals are self evident and universal and on the other hand you say morals change. Well which is it? I understand that If you are from a certain place and grew up learning a certain set of beliefs, yes it seems obvious which things are wrong and which are right. That doesn't make those morals universal, however. The books are net necessarily for the people who believe those things to be self evident, but to convince those who don't.
Another thing I really have problems is with is the fact that you pair the sentences,
God is an idea.
God can't hurt you.
Do you not believe that ideas have the power to hurt or to help? Do you not believe that a collective societal idea can hold significant power over an individual?
Also, I'd just like to point out that I may be wrong, but after having read the bible (which includes the bulk of jewish texts as well) and most of the Koran, I never caught any part of any of them that said that Christians hate Muslims or Muslims hate jews.
 Originally Posted by Xaqaria
If you'd read any of the research done with feral children then you wouldn't be able to make a statement like that. Through observation we have learned that people are probably not born ingrained with innate social codes. The structure of the society you are born in to dictates a good portion of what you see as reality during your early developmental stage.
What I'm saying is that we are born with instincts, which we can choose not to follow. However, the morals change, in the sense that as humans progress thru the ages they have different standards. Then this was okay, today this is not, etc. But what many people beleive is that morals are a force in the universe, as if it will strike them down.
What I meant by 'God is an idea, God can't hurt you.' is that God is a human idea. Sadly, human collectivism makes it so that an ideas followers can hurt you, which is another thing entirley. Imagine if there were no followers of God, and you didn't follow his word. HE couldn't touch you, as he doesn't exist.
As for the hate factor, it is the same as the followers hurting you thing. A hate for other religions in the Bible are not 'there', but it seems many assume that you must 'convert the infidel' or something.
In your second quote- That is exactly what I mean. If you were thrown into the wilderness at an early age and to survive you had to kill and steal, then yes, they would be your morals. But if you were born into a rich and shelterd family, your morals would be whatever you think is 'right'.
|
|
Bookmarks