I think Keeper's post requires a piece-by-piece debunking.
 Originally Posted by Keeper
THey dont read the Bible thouraly. They roll over when someone attacks scripture and go with the flow, saing the Bible isn't truth when it is. If you say one part is false, how can you exept any part of it?[/b]
And how can you accept the entirety of it as truth? The Bible is a mistranslated piece of garbage. As TBM mentioned, there are some more accurate translations out there, but I'm going to go out on a limb and guess that you read the KJV, most likely. Either way, the Bible has been translated, retranslated, deliberately altered, edited, reedited and otherwise altered millions of times. Did you know that the New Testament wasn't even written until nearly a century AFTER Christ's supposed death?
 Originally Posted by Keeper
Thier are so called christians who exept whatever the world says. There are christians who think the Bible is backwords because of what the old beleived, and didn't look to see what the Anchents, the true believers, knew. You say the Bible denighs evolution? Tell me where it says so? You say that it says the earth circles the sun? Go on, show me. Prove your claims, and tell me why I am wrong. Prove it with your Science, and I will prove it right by the very same meens.[/b]
Yes, the Bible is backward. And outright dangerous. You think that the Muslims are a violent people? Only because most Christians, RIGHTFULLY, ignore most of the Bible's teachings. Here's a brief summary for you:
A Collection of Sunday Bible Passages.
As to where the Bible denies evolution:
And God made the beast of the earth after his kind, and cattle after their kind, and every thing that creepeth upon the earth after his kind: and God saw that [it was] good.[/b]
That implies that one species cannot transition to another.
 Originally Posted by Keeper
.Millenia there was a "cloud" of ice that surounded us. When it melted, the flood happend.[/b]
Uh-oh. PLEASE tell me you aren't a Kent Hovind fan.
This is wrong on several levels. For one, where did the water go AFTER the flood? The Old Testament had the same geography as the current world...so where did the water go? It can't have just gone into the seas--if it did they'd have risen significantly and altered the entire world's geography, not to mention left massive amounts of tangible evidence. So basically this assumes that enough water to completely coat the entire earth and drown nearly every living land animal just fell from the sky and magically disappeared. The next problem is that there is NO evidence of receding flood waters on that scale. In fact, there's a good deal of evidence against it. The Grand Canyon, notably. such a formation cannot be formed by waters on the scale your flood myth involves. Receding flood waters, especially on a large scale, create wide, round, and straight channels, not deep, narrow, winding ones. There's several other flaws. For gawd's sake, man! Use your brain!
 Originally Posted by Keeper
At every turn, Science exults the Creator, the All-Sorce. Entropy proves the Creator, if you look at it carfully enough. The events in the Bible are documented fact. We are missing a day in our calander. Scientists now believe that it is the day when Gidion asked God to stop the sun.[/b]
No, actually we are NOT missing a day in our calendar. In fact, I'd like you to explain how we would know if we were. The myth that scientists found a day missing was created by some loser online who apparently needed something more concrete in his desperate struggle to validate his beliefs. Reference here.
 Originally Posted by Keeper
The moddles of evolution are flawed in some respects, though the principle iteself is somewhat true. The expreement that showed that amino acids can be produced in sertain contitions also made amino distroying chemicles as well.[/b]
How is evolution flawed? I'd like to hear you explain that. In fact, I'm sure that thousands, if not millions of scientists, all of whom have spent their entire lives testing, retesting, challenging and researching evolution would all like to know.
And what does the amino bit have to do with this? I understand the connection, but how does that apply to your argument?
 Originally Posted by Keeper
Explain the Scientist beleiver to me. Tell me if the sorce of your knowledge denighs the Most High when they hemselves beleive.[/b]
Huh? Explain yourself. And please, try to spell things correctly, I'm having serious issues trying to decipher your words.
 Originally Posted by Keeper
I will leave you with theas thoughts, even though I know I will be mocked for them. But to mock me truly, first, prove me wrong. And to do that, you must look your data up. When you do, what will you think when it conferms my words? In a few days, I will place the first of many links that prove my word.[/b]
Already had the data. I've done my homework, kid. You apparently haven't, especially with your "evidence" such as the supposed "day missing on our calendar". In fact, your entire religion is based on myth, so its rather fitting that you resort to urban myths circulated online to try to defend it.
And if your much-awaited links are Kent Hovind sites, you might want to reconsider posting them, or you might just be laughed out of the room.
 Originally Posted by Keeper
Oh, and those who will mock me, I pray for you especially. [/b]
If I had a dollar for every time I've been told that. Keep prayin' my good man. Maybe your invisible sky daddy will come down and smite me into righteousness. Wouldn't hold your breath waiting for it, though...it seems he doesn't get around to answering any prayers nowadays.
|
|
Bookmarks