Thread: Jesus looked more like osama you know.

lol, we use to joke about that alot in high school. I remember once a drunk guy in a party getting all messed up with the jesus and adam and eve, saying adam and eve looked like osama

Originally posted by Neruo
Jesus is from jeruzalem right?

Every 'picture' of jesus shows jesus as a tall White man. Just becouse the churches in the middel ages spammed so much jesus around, and they all though 'of course the must have been white like us' (bunch of racists people were). *So on every picture in every church jesus Is a white man.

Well in jeruzalem eveyone look more like osama then like bush. *

So stop worshipping that white dude on those pictures. Kthx. *

So, when was it exactly that oral tradition was supposed to forget what Jesus looked like. It is simply one more hint of athism to suppose that it was never generally known what Jesus looked like and that it was passed along.

And about you knowing what people in the Near East look like. Remember this was 2000 years ago. This was before the Arab Traders engaged in a 1000 years of trading in Negro Slaves. You know, if you work with tar you will get your hands dirty. The Arabs never used to be so dark and they never used to have such curly hair. I suppose it is alot like Americas past and future. Will anyone, a thousand years from now ever suppose that White People lived in America when the American of the future will look, well, like Arabs now look, after they too had profitted of negro slavery.

People like you will be questioning historical portraits of a white George Washington.

Yeah sure leo

But still Jesus wasn't a white boy.

I'd be interested to hear what you have to say about the Council of Nicea in 325AD Leo.

If memery do serve, about a year ago there was a study on this subject. Jesus was alive roughly around the time of Caeser and such. The Romans kept fairly good records, they were a huge empire, they had too...
we know from the records and mosaics that the "style" at the time was the "caeser" cut. It's plasable to assume jesus blended in. Especially during his younger years.

Yeah I always heard that Jesus was really most likely black. Or at least alot darker than is represented.

I saw this very Subject on the Discovery Channel =D

They made a digital representation of what Jesus would have looked like. He had short curly dark brown hair, not quite black, and had a dark skin tone. Like Arabians or something. It was pretty interesting.

Originally posted by Forsaken Exposition
I saw this very Subject on the Discovery Channel =D

They made a digital representation of what Jesus would have looked like. He had short curly dark brown hair, not quite black, and had a dark skin tone. Like Arabians or something. It was pretty interesting.

Yeah I saw that too ^___^

And yeah, who says that jesus wasn't bald? Not like we have pictures of him >: ( I say that the fact that jesus has long hair is an insult to bald people!!11!!!1

Originally posted by Neruo
Yeah sure leo

But still Jesus wasn't a white boy.

And you know this how?

consult the Art Work of Egypt and especially the remaining portraits from the Minoan Civilization. Looks like white people to me.

Then we need to consider that after the Conquests of the Macedonnian Alexander -- and Macedonia is up in the belly of Europe -- and then the traffic of the Roman Empire, that this section of the Near East, not yet touched by African Slavery, was for the last 5 Centuries under the foot of Europeans.

And then consider the nature of Women. Do not women prefer wealthy and sophisticated foreigners with engaging accents to men of local poverty? First the Greeks would have been favored of the women of Judah, and then the Romans. And remember that these Romans were then not tarnished with any influence of the Saracen Invasions of Souther Italy that would come later. Italians, then, were not dark.

Then we can consider that Jesus's own community was just miles away from what had been a major cosmopolitian trading center of the Alexandrian and then Roman World. One of the reasons the citizenry of Jerusalem despised Galilee was because it was virtually a suburb of European influence.

And do I have to mention again that it is ridiculous to suppose that nobody remembered what Jesus had looked like and failed to pass it on. We must remember the Power of Oral Traditions. you know, people did not always write everything down. So, for those who want to revise History, they must suppose that their derived guess which assumes that the demographics in the near east were exactly the same 2000 years ago as now, that this glorified and ill informed guess is better than the uninterrupted testimony of eye-witnesses. It is just another form of skeptical atheism stepping in to destroy for the sake of the glee of destruction.

Originally posted by Forsaken Exposition
I saw this very Subject on the Discovery Channel =D

They made a digital representation of what Jesus would have looked like. He had short curly dark brown hair, not quite black, and had a dark skin tone. Like Arabians or something. It was pretty interesting.

This was a travesty committed by other atheists like yourself. They took no care in order to establish that the oral traditions describing Jesus were ever interrupted, and they made no effort to discern whether there was not then in the Near East and Ionian Regions a strong influence for a facial and coloring disposition that we find in Christ. Indeed, their presentation amounts to nothing more than the lowest level of racial slurs. it would be a thousand years before the darkness and kinkiness would enter into the Near East. Those producers of the Discovery Program, held to no scientific standard were only generating an opinion that would appeal to the Atheistic Community. Perhaps one of the Producers was able to move up another slot in the Free Masons for such a successful attack on the Traditions of Religion.

Oral traditions are crap.

Let 100 people sit in a circle and let the first one whisper to the second: 'jesus was a white boy'. Let the 2nd whisper what he heard to the 3rd. Ect.

'Jesus was a white boy' changes into 'Bring more yams for lunch'.

And stop talking like you are right. No one can ever know or he/she is right. Jesus could allso have been a negro. Why not. It is possible.

The problem with you christans is that you think in absolutes. There is no truth, not to mankind. Not even science is a truth. And a religion Certainy is not a truth, becouse it is more then anything else created and/or passed on by mankind. And mankind tends to fuck things up.

Originally posted by Neruo
Oral traditions are crap.

Let 100 people sit in a circle and let the first one whisper to the second: 'jesus was a white boy'. Let the 2nd whisper what he heard to the 3rd. Ect.

'Jesus was a white boy' changes into 'Bring more yams for lunch'.

And stop talking like you are right. No one can ever know or he/she is right. Jesus could allso have been a negro. Why not. It is possible. *

The problem with you christans is that you think in absolutes. There is no truth, not to mankind. Not even science is a truth. And a religion Certainy is not a truth, becouse it is more then anything else created and/or passed on by mankind. And mankind tends to fuck things up.

I wouldn't exactly disregard oral tradition by comparing it to the telephone game There was more to it than hearing it once in a barely audible fashion and then passing it down. It had to involve rigorous training, repetition, and recitation to make sure the correct story would be passed down. This doesn't mean for what is being passed down is truthful and I think that is what you were referring to, but it wasn't a light task. As for your last remark, that to me seems like an absolutist statement in itself.

I agree with Genjyo, we can't totally disregard oral traditions, but i don't think we can trust the major source of them. I don't mean to bash any religion, but in my opinion the Catholic church has a history of distorting the facts into their favor. Brady mention the Council of Nicea

http://www.columbia.edu/cu/augustine/arch/...randt/nicea.htm
(for those who don't know about it)

perfect example...
I think any major christian religion would distort the to their favor.

Does anybody have any oral record of what jesus looked like that hasn't been tainted by the Catholics, or any other major christian religion?

I heard some one say jesus had croocked theeth... and I heard he was a bit asian-looking.

What did Jesus look like? What a silly question...He was a Jew-boy. He looks like your accountant, for goodness sakes. He's from Galilley. Go to Israel and everyone there looks like Jesus (I know, I know, politically incorrect, kind of like saying all black people look alike).

About the only difference between Jesus and other Jewish guys is his hair was kind of red, but there are a lot of pure-blood Jews who occationally have that reddy hair.

And yes, its crazy that people paint him as a white guy. You want to worship the authentic Jesus, you'd do better taking a picture of a Hasidic Jew (curls and all) and hanging it over your mantle piece.

Catholics though get my goat a little bit because they, historically speaking, didn't want their God to look at all like the Jews they we persecuting. Its hard to persecute someone who looks somewhat like your God.

Seriously, you want to know what Jesus looked like? Take a digital photo of a Jewish guy, 33 years old, with a short beard, ratty mustach and long hair. Then take it into Photoshop and tint his hair, beard and eyebrows a bit red and there you go. No oral tradition BS, just a normal looking Jewish guy. That was Jesus back in 33AD.

And stop talking like you are right. No one can ever know or he/she is right. Jesus could allso have been a negro. Why not. It is possible. [/b]

Jesus wasn't black. I can say that with quite a bit of confidence. Whatever oral traditions and records were passed down, there's still a limit to how disfigured they can become. We can assume from what's been written about Jesus that he was a pretty average dude, other than the fact that he was a particularly good persuasive speaker and had rather abstract politcal and religious ideals for the time. Physically, though, he wasn't an oddity. A black man claiming to be the son of God in Jerusalem during that time period would be ANYTHING but normal. Racism was alive and thriving there and then, and had Jesus been black he certainly would've heard about it. So much that he probably could never have built up the following that he had.

Now, to know EXACTLY what he looked like is still up for debate. Pointless debate, since we can't go back and photograph him, but we can make a few generalizations about what he'd look like, mostly based on race. And racially, Jesus was a JEW. NOT asian, and certainly NOT BLACK.

Basically, what Genjyo and Draco said.

Don't let it confuse you if history and suprahistory intersect.

Want to know what Christ looks like?

Take a look in the metaphysical mirror.

Jesus, don't take my life.
Return me to the whom from which I was born. Birth is a sin, the punishment is death.
I wish you had left me.....UNBORN!

lol you silly people. 'Jew' isn't a race. It just happens that alot of jews these days look the same way, becouse just a few parts didn't turn to christianity. Before jesus, just about every fucking one in the middle east was jew. Or aleast the average jew then doesn't look like the average jew now.

So that argument is so full of crap.

And if god created man after his own image or something... there are more asians then white people... so god would look more like an asian then like a white boy.

Ha.

Or asians just like to screw more than others .

Who the !"#%$°! cares what jesus looked like, it won't realy change your perspective in anything, unless your line of rationality goes behind racial matters.

The Jewish ARE a race. True, they don't look the same today as they did then, but they are a race nonetheless.

Originally posted by Tsen
The Jewish ARE a race. True, they don't look the same today as they did then, but they are a race nonetheless.

Oh, so if I would go do a bar mitza or what ever I would turn into a jew? =)

Nah I guess that the realy die-hard jews are all from easter-europe or some area so they all look alike.

btw the point of this tread wasn't as much to say they jesus might have looked a bit different then people think. It's the fact that people make so much shit up about god that doesn't has to be correct.

And it allso is just a fact that if europeans were black in the middleages, and they would enslave the white people, they would have painted jesus black too on all those paintings.

So basically, organised relgion leads to gehyness.

Originally posted by Neruo


Oh, so if I would go do a bar mitza or what ever I would turn into a jew? =)

Nah I guess that the realy die-hard jews are all from easter-europe or some area so they all look alike.

We're not talking about the jewish religion, we're talking about the race, also known as Semitic.
Every hear Hitler referred to as an "Anti-Semitist?"
Hitler hated them as much as a race than as a religion.

Either way, Semitists and Hasidic jews are modern. It's moot and stupid to argue that "Jesus looked like a jew," because the Semitic race as we know it is totally different than it was 2000 years ago.

Exactly. Like Draco said, we don't know what Jews looked like for sure 2000 years ago, but Jews ARE a race, and we know that Christ WAS a Jew.

There's a big difference between a religious Jew and an ethnic Jew.