 Originally Posted by snoop
I definitely agree that making a distinction between lucidity and non-lucidity, along with consciously directing effort toward becoming lucid is pretty much entirely irrelevant, if not in many ways potentially detrimental to developing and fully realizing one's ability to be aware of one's dream and to interact with it. Lucidity vs. non-lucidity is just a false dichotomy.
I realize as I read your post, that beyond the misleading dichotomy of lucidity, our definition of dreaming is bound to affect our lucidity. In a naive "aha moment," we feel we now have opened our eyes to our state: "I am dreaming!" If we are ignorant about this state, we have barely been made more aware of anything.
If I think about it, the "I am dreaming" eureka moment comes with the realization that "nothing is real; everything is illusion." Sure, that's not false. Yet, the assumption is that nothing is meaningful... And I feel this might be an important reason why my dreams break up upon lucidity (myself not being alone to experience this phenomena). If the "aha moment" is the realization that nothing is meaningful and if the dream is trying to find meaningful connections (as loose as they may be), it makes sense that the dream would collapse. The oneironaut experiences a nihilistic dream crisis.
Shamans dream with purpose. You wouldn't expect a shaman to experience dream nihilism. They think dreams are meaningful. You wouldn't expect their entry in the dream world to be "aha, nothing is real!"
I feel if we plan on realizing that we are in a dream, we must be cautious to know what that means to us. "I am dreaming, swimming in meaning" might be a more constructive "aha moment." Yet, I am not aware of all the negative or misleading assumptions that we make when the flash of lucidity washes over us.
|
|
Bookmarks