To provide a counterargument which is as substantive as your argument:
No.
Printable View
Ah, I'm glad I stumbled across this, I was worried I wouldn't be able to meet my stupidity quota for the day.
Wow, lay off the crazy juice and educate yourself.Quote:
If you could focus your attention to vibrate your body at a certain rate of motion through your conscious will, you could theoretically dissolve your material body into energy beyond the material into light waveforms. Just like the principle of breaking glass through sound waves produces a material effect.
Breaking glass though sound waves when you use sound (a physical phenomenon where vibrations are induced in a medium) which under the right circumstances will cause resonance (a physical phenomenon) causing energy buildup (physical phenomenon) large enough to shatter some of the bonds.
It's exactly the same as if I took a hammer to it. It doesn't magically convert energy into "the material beyond light", whatever the hell that means. Even if you could spontaneously atomize yourself through the force of will somehow, you end up with a vaporized human being and thus a completely nonfunctional system.
I don't know where you got this shit from, but go and learn some actual science.
Evidence of what exactly are you looking for specifically that you don't agree with? Everything I am saying is theorized through a hypothesis of what can be known through the scientific axioms that are known through either the research or the body of knowledge that we have so far.
What cult do you think I am a part of? If I am a cult member I would have to belong to a specific cult. Since you don't have any evidence I belong to a cult that is sounding more like slander.
Photolysis, I am educating myself every day. If I am still on the forum when I finish my degree you will hear about it. And there is science to it already. Resonance is from frequency and amplitude of vibration and motion changing it's arrangement. The principle is the same when it comes to thought. And it wouldn't be vaporizing yourself, just tuning yourself to a different frequency. When you change radio stations, the station that you tune out of doesn't vaporize itself. Even though the radio stops playing that specific station, the signal itself still exists. There are devices which can measure thoughts through brainwave activity. Just as frequencies of sound projected can arrange sand in specific geometric patterns. So has thought demonstrated to arrange the crystalline structure in water through specific geometric structures depending on the nature of the thought or frequency of it, the memory of it gets encoded in the water. The same laws of nature ultimately allow encoding of information on a hard drive in a computer.
In the same way information in DNA is encoded in your body at a specific arrangement, Scientist are already finding out ways of manipulating the DNA and interpreting it, which is set to uncover and overcome things to do with aging and diseases. Hypnosis and other altered states is a perfect example of how changing the way the mind is interpreting things can result in different perceptions and perspectives, and abilities. If you hypnotized someone to see through a person, they could have xray vision and tell what is behind their back. How would that be possible if a persons physical body was not merely a type of frequency of information existing that you could tune out of and through, to get other information within the field and connect to it, that you normally couldn't see with your eyes.
I said you are like a cult member and pretty much called you one in the metaphoric sense. I don't have knowledge of your membership in a specific cult. My response was to a post where you made claims without backing them up with arguments. What evidence do you have that I will be conscious after death? What evidence do you have that I will start pretending I am still alive on Earth after I am dead if I don't "make a decision" to come out of my "delusion?" Can you back up anything you said?
Britain's only Cardinal has just been accused of "inappropriate behaviour". ._.
hey why was my post deleted?
What does it mean to "deliver"?
What do we mean when we say, "deliver"?
I've had the past day to edit my post and, in turn, deliver what I promised. As a fundamentalist, however, I can't help but feel my failure to do so would provide a much more appropriate symbol with which to complement the intentions of the OP.
Regardless, here I am.
I have promised only "good things," yet what have I to show you?
What is it you are expecting of me?