Thread: Why Christians are not just a load of backwards imbeciles.

Originally Posted by ChaybaChayba

Ok, but if I ran my program, I would have noticed my error, and I would have been able to easily correct it. Is this true or not?

Depends on whether you know how to use modulo.

I'm more concerned as to how you're going to make your program check every number from 1 to 100.

This is going offtopic, and I think I've proven that I know how to program, my code did indeed not make sense but that is because I haven't programmed in ages. If you replaced the / with % the code would work. Someone who has never programmed couldn't have possibly written that piece of code. Even if the code doesn't work, it doesn't matter. It's the thought that matters

So because I can program, I am right and you are wrong? Is that your conclusion? Haha.

Originally Posted by ChaybaChayba

This is going offtopic, and I think I've proven that I know how to program, my code did indeed not make sense but that is because I haven't programmed in ages. If you replaced the / with % the code would work. Someone who has never programmed couldn't have possibly written that piece of code. Even if the code doesn't work, it doesn't matter. It's the thought that matters

So because I can program, I am right and you are wrong? Is that your conclusion? Haha.

The problem is not the simple replacement of / with % but the thought process involved as you rightly conclude. I would be more than happy to forgive a simple syntax error but I asked for one program and you provided a completely different program. I have no doubt that you understand programming at a syntactic level. The program that you showed indicates a complete lack of basic reasoning though without which being able to understand programming from a semantic level is out of the question. You are now further compounding this by attempting to assert that a completely wrong program demonstrates your ability as a programmer. And like I said earlier, programming is as on topic as computers are. You're the one that brought those up in an attempt to make a broken analogy. If you want to switch back to evolution, I'm sure we would be more than happy to help you humiliate yourself on that topic as well.

String retardedFunction (int nnumber) {
float number = nnumber;
if ((number%3 == 0) && (number%5 == 0)) return "FizzBuzz";
if (number%3 == 0) return "Buzz";
if (number%5 == 0) return "Fizz";

return ""+number;

}

I just ran this code through the compiler and it does work. I don't understand why you claim it doesn't? So you claim the compiler is lying?

Originally Posted by ChaybaChayba

I just ran this code through the compiler and it does work. I don't understand why you claim it doesn't? So you claim the compiler is lying?

That's not the code you posted. You fixed it after we told you how to. What exactly does this prove? You're essentially, putting words in my mouth and using a "straw man" argument. This is a typical creationist tactic. It's amusing to see it used outside of the context of a debate directly about creationism. I wonder if creationists know that they're intellectually dishonest or if this is really how they think.

Please view this two part video

Originally Posted by ChaybaChayba

I just ran this code through the compiler and it does work. I don't understand why you claim it doesn't? So you claim the compiler is lying?

I wouldn't mine seeing the print log. In the end, PhilosopherStoned's post still stands.

What point still stands? That I can't program eventho I did write the right code? I mean the evidence is there, black on white, and you guys still ignore it. Amazing.

On top of all that, you're going to claim I'm the immoral one and dishonest one? It's the exact opposite way around. This is just too lame for words, you can't argue over programming code. If it works, it works.

Besides, I'm both an evolutionist and a creationist, so your prejudice against creationists doesn't make any sense here. Prejudice never made any sense in my book to start with.

Originally Posted by ChaybaChayba

I already completely anticpated your reply, check out my first post. My counter argument is that you copy the fake image of God that was depicted in the Bible. If you think the Bible is bullshit, you shouldn't be basing your argumentation on this bullshit. Eventho you totally disagree with the Bible, you still base your concept of God completely on what the Bible said. How about learning to think for yourself? What makes that one guy who wrote the Bible 2000 years ago so much more intelligent than you?

Stop being stupid, please. It isn't my idea of god. It is one idea of god that is common, which is why I was addressing it. I wasn't talking to you past the first few sentences. I don't know what your idea of god is, but I have thought about it and the conclusion I came to is that there is no thing which I would call "god."

Originally Posted by ChaybaChayba

Btw you are making fun of my idea of logic, but if both sides are not capable of logic, what would be the point of talking? My point about logic is that certain truths can be arrived at through debate, because anyone is capable of logic. Babies being able to learn 3 languages at the same time is a pretty good indication of the inherent logic we all possess.

Which is why I'm not going to waste much time talking to you. Learning languages has really nothing to do with logic and that conclusion just shows again you don't have even a basic understanding of what you're talking about.

Originally Posted by greenhavoc

You're a horrible person. Now I may have a hard time proving this, especially around a group of individuals as equally horrible if not more than yourself, but you're horrible none the less. Horrible.

Thanks for stoppin' by.

"Stop being stupid please." "This is why I'm not going to waste much time talking to you" How about some respect for your fellow human being? Is this hate really necessary?

This thread reminds me so much of:

Originally Posted by ChaybaChayba

"Stop being stupid please." "This is why I'm not going to waste much time talking to you" How about some respect for your fellow human being? Is this hate really necessary?

I love when you do this. You ignore the rest of the post completely. Nice.

Also, you didn't write the right code, in either the sqrt example or the FizzBuzz example and you still haven't provided a print log or a working program.

I'm just going to observe from now on. Arguing with you is meaningless.

Hahaha, "it is but a scratch" ... "your arm's off"... exactly like the programming argument here. I post working code and people claim I don't. So I'm arthur and PhilosopherStoned is the Black knight?

I find it simply amazing how people can claim my code doesn't work, while it does. Arguing about code is meaningless indeed.

I think you're confused... but hey, it's possible that everybody but you is wrong.

I don't mind admitting that I'm wrong, I'm wrong. There. Happy? For me this is about getting good arguments and counter-arguments. Not about being right or wrong. I'm in search for the truth, so if I'm wrong I will gladly admit it. But as long as i don't understand why I'm wrong, I can't really admit that I'm wrong, now can I?

About the code, yes everybody is wrong, and the code is right. It compiles just fine, so either the compiler is a liar or you guys are a bunch of liars.

Originally Posted by ChaybaChayba

Hahaha, "it is but a scratch" ... "your arm's off"... exactly like the programming argument here. I post working code and people claim I don't. So I'm arthur and PhilosopherStoned is the Black knight?

I find it simply amazing how people can claim my code doesn't work, while it does. Arguing about code is meaningless indeed.

HHHAAAAAA HHHAAAA HAAAA HAAAAAAHAAA HAAA HAAA HAAAA
AHH HAAAAA HAAA HAAA HAAAAAAHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAHAAAAAAAAA
HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAA AAAAHHHHHHHHHH
HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHH HHHHHHHHHHHHAAAAA

ok.

wait a minute.

Ok. I think I'm cool now.

First, please don't HAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAA HAAAAAAAAAA HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHAAAAAAAAAA
HHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA HHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

ok. I think I've got it together.

Please don't single me out. Everybody but you is King Arthur and you are most definitely the Black Night in that analogy. The thing about that analogy that's inaccurate is the part where the Black Night lands a kick. Nothing close to that ever happened.

Second, the code you posted after you made the corrections that both Marvo and myself told you were necessary probably works. I haven't seen any evidence and I haven't tried to run it but there is no question as you yourself admitted that it didn't work before those corrections.

This is getting ridiculous. I think I'm gonna put you back on ignore for the time being. I am starting to get a little heated and I don't want to get banned over you again. I just don't know how to deal with you. I'm still incredibly offended that I got an infraction for insulting you from the same administrator that concluded that you're not trolling. How incredibly offensive to you is that? You are not just trolling but are actually stupid enough to make these arguments. If I was an administrator, I would ban you for trolling and give an infraction to anybody that claimed you weren't trolling for disrespecting your intelligence.

Sure the first code didn't work, but after I changed the / into %, it did. So claiming I can't program is a lie.
If you were truly thinking that I was a troll, you would not bother replying, you would not feed the troll, so this is another lie.

How to deal with me? Just ingore me. Easy. There are 1000 topics on dreamviews, why do you need to enter this one topic where I post? Do you even honestly care about God?

Anyway you're the one insulting me and my intellect all the time, and then you claim I'm the troll?

Originally Posted by ChaybaChayba

"Stop being stupid please." "This is why I'm not going to waste much time talking to you" How about some respect for your fellow human being? Is this hate really necessary?

Never have you ever made a respectable post.

Saying that I have never ever made a respectable post, would mean that you would have to have read each and every single post I made. Which you obviously did not do. So this is a lie.

But ok if you truly believe that, I suggest you ignore me. Problem solved.

Originally Posted by ChaybaChayba

But ok if you truly believe that, I suggest you ignore me. Problem solved.

I think most of us would prefer that you stopped posting.

Right. If you want me to stop posting, stop asking questions, stop talking to me, stop replying to my posts. People are insulting me because I'm not answering all their questions, and now you're going to complain that I do answer to many questions. Make some sense?

Anyway, I wonder where Rickrold ran off to...

If I just ignore you you're bound to pop up in some other marginally better thread that I want to post in and derail it. The worst part about you is how you argue the same nonsense over and over again in different threads that we have to defend against time and time again. I like playing ping-pong against an opponent, not a wall.

You're the one coming all the way over here to the Religion/Spirituality forum eventho you're not religious or spiritual. And then you're going to tell me to GTFO?

There are 1000 of threads on dreamviews, why do you need to go into this one thread where I post? Just to argue the same nonsense over and over and over again. Just to play ping-pong against a wall?

Attempting not to read this thread is like attempting not to look at a gruesome car accident on the side of the road.