 Originally Posted by guitarboy
Why Do We Laugh?
Philosopher John Morreall believes that the first human laughter may have begun as a g esture of shared relief at the passing of danger. And since the relaxation that results from a bout of laughter inhibits the biological fight-or-flight response, laughter may indicate trust in one's companions.
Many researchers believe that the purpose of laughter is related to making and strengthening human connections. "Laughter occurs when people are comfortable with one another, when they feel open and free. And the more laughter [there is], the more bonding [occurs] within the group," says cultural anthropologist Mahadev Apte. This feedback "loop" of bonding-laughter-more bonding, combined with the common desire not to be singled out from the group, may be another reason why laughter is often contagious.
Studies have also found that dominant individuals -- the boss, the tribal chief or the family patriarch -- use humor more than their subordinates. If you've often thought that everyone in the office laughs when the boss laughs, you're very perceptive. In such cases, Morreall says, controlling the laughter of a group becomes a way of exercising power by controlling the emotional climate of the group. So laughter, like much human behavior, must have evolved to change the behavior of others, Provine says. For example, in an embarrassing or threatening situation, laughter may serve as a conciliatory gesture or as a way to deflect anger. If the threatening person joins the laughter, the risk of confrontation may lessen.
Yes, this is of course all true. It is, however, a social aspect.
I've been wondering about laughter for some time now, and luckily found H. Bergson's book on this very subject. I'm currently still reading it.
According to him, there are basic things in common for everything what's considered as comical.
First of all, it has to be a human characteristic. And this is very interesting. We could laugh at our pet, but only because we noticed a human behavior, a human feature. We could laugh at a certain object, such as a piece of clothes, but actually we would be laughing at the human feature that we noticed in its description.
Secondly, laughter and emotion simply can not exist together. Yes, we could laugh at someone who we even empathize with, but in that couple of seconds, it is inevitable to rise above the feeling to be able to laugh.
Further on, 'comical', the object itself is inadvertent and unaware.
|
|
Bookmarks