 Originally Posted by drewmandan
Suppose a "god" was simply an intelligent being that instantiated a computer simulation of a universe that spawned a virtual intelligence, call it O'nus, that questioned whether gods can be conscious. Is this "god" not conscious?
I assimilated the response of mine to this issue as already brought up by Xei:
Here are the problems:
- The mention of simulated reality is redundant as we are still discussing a creator even of those that are simulating reality. No matter who is doing the "simulating" there still must be a beginning to things.
- You are saying that even in a simulated reality, or any reality, a being "could" exist. This means nothing, you are not saying anything nor proving anything nor contributing anything. You could also say, "There may be such thing as Santa" but you are not actually saying anything substantial besides the notion of plausibility.
- It is not a counter-example because it has nothing to do with anything that I have said. I am arguing over the foundations of consciousness, time, and the self. Simulated realities are irrelevant. Furthermore, simulated realities are still subject to every issue I mentioned which does not affect my argument.
Even in a simulated example, the creator of the simulation is not "everywhere".
For example:
- The Matrix. The creators are still not omni-beings in their actuality. The Matrix is irrelevant as we are directly speaking of the creators themselves who are, in fact, not omni-beings.
- Take an example of a simulation in which there is just 1 creator with a machine controlling other variables like androids or something (it does not really matter). The fact remains that, in that creators reality, they are still not omni-beings.
So, your this argument is inadequate because the examples you cite or simulated realities are not counter-examples to omni-beings that would be at the beginning of everything. This being omni-beings.
~
|
|
Bookmarks