Your lack of insight is disturbing.Quote:
Originally Posted by Seismosaur
Printable View
Your lack of insight is disturbing.Quote:
Originally Posted by Seismosaur
Your lack is disturbing.
Yes, my flawlessness does catch people off guard.
I was talking about your lack of insight.
You fail at english.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ItalicsQuote:
Originally Posted by Seismosaur
Your lack of ontopic is even more disturbing.
You fail to realize this is my thread. You're on the wrong side of the playground.
GET OUT OF MY THREAD!!capspl0x
God, just make out already. This is like some sick softcore gay retard porn.
Who pissed in your coffee?Quote:
Originally Posted by Xaqaria
Xaqaria seems to be having a bad day today.
Apparently.
Actually for most of the time I was thinking what your post had to do with stepping out of swimming pools.
Edit: but know I want to know how this is connected to hitler and nazis.
Define progress. Justify why it is more important, not why you think it is important.Quote:
Originally Posted by Vance
You fail.
*Continues watching TV*
You drew the swastika the wrong way.
I copied it from ED. And considering I could probably be convicted for that, that's even better.
Cool post. I liked it. Very thought provoking. So I thought about the initial statement (as an exercise) and my conclusion is:
The initial statement, if broken down into true or false, is true.
The problem we have is that entertainment, and the pursuit of it, is so primitive, so built into our genes that we believe it is a necessity. Every country, every culture and every time period has some form of entertainment whether it be games, sports, plays, movies etc.
So is entertainment necessary? If we conducted an experiment with a group of babies and brought them up with no entertainment or games of any kind would they kill themselves? Would they have a desire to procreate?
If they killed themselves or they failed to procreate then we could say the initial statement is false after all.
Stop right there. I didn't read past the second paragraph. My response to the first paragraph was "A play and a movie, although they do not directly further humanity, react to the individual's unique brainwiring to produce a specific flicker of inspiration of thought and emotion. Due to the inumerable outcomes of human thought, a movie or play does not elicit the same response in everyone. In this way, movies and plays aren't reiterations of archetypal, repetitive thought, but vessels for the modification and evolution of individual thought."
I stopped reading the first time at the second "Stop right there," as I felt I already knew the jist of the post. I find it ironic that my reaction to the first paragraph now has dual meaning.
Now, aside from your assumption that I will continue reading the post due to curiosity, give me a good reason to finish reading the post.