Quote Originally Posted by skysaw View Post
Given that you haven't done much research on it, you should recognize that the second quote is merely an assumption on your part. In fact, the deeper you look into it, the more it makes sense.

It's pretty easy to find begining reading on the topic. Go you and acquire some.
I think you misunderstand me. I haven't done much research on it, that's true... But I also haven't done much research on anything I can refute with pure logic. Is there any way to refute the proof I gave against evolution? It totally goes against the law of entropy. We find dinasaur bones, but yet magically there seems to be no evidence of the millions if not billions of transitional "missing links" between any species which would have to be to prove evolution with any validity. Darwin himself said on his deathbed that he was wrong about evolution.

To suggest that it took lungs millions of years to evolve to the working lungs that exist in the human body is completely ludicrous. So what? Our early ancesestors didn't breath? Maybe because they couldn't breath, their brain evolved so that it wouldn't need oxygen for the period of time it took for the lungs to then be complete and then... wait no... it doesn't make sense any way you slice it.