I am Me tell me im not
Printable View
I am Me tell me im not
Pssssh. You're not Me. Everybody knows I am. :P
Then who am I? :huh:
Not me, in your case, if I do say so, myself. :content:
So in your case you are you and I am not, where as in my case I am me.
All so simple now :doh:
and i am still me
yes and if I were you I would be me too
But only i am me, if i were you, i would be me too
Me, me, me, me, me... Me too.
Well you may be you at the moment, but in two days, seven hours, and thirty-seven minutes you will no longer be you.
mini-me?
Okay. Here we go.
"me" is implied by the term "I".
If, however, I deny you the use of the term "I" in the first place, not only is there no "me", but there is no "I" to BE that "me".
So: there is no "I". The self, consciousness, is an illusion, the product of causality. Individual being, and consciousness, are naught but an illusion.
BTW: Though I deny dropout the use of the term "I", I myself retain the right to use that term, because:
I am God. As such, I fall outside causality and time, and my consciousness is not an illusion. I am, therefore, allowed to say "I".
We are the Keeper
Me is irrelevent
Thus ends another meeting of the pro-noun club. Join us all again next week!
Ok.
I am here.
Are you?
ME
Me is a perfect word to describe our labeling process. Me is just singular pronoun, referring to himself or herself. A small class of words found in many languages that are used as replacements or substitutes for nouns and noun phrases.
Me or I or the thought of either rare all constructs of the ergodic entity. You could just say I am. With out saying any example thereafter. You just are. You exist. If you were a "me" you would not be the same me as you were the moment after you read this.
So you are not me or not you. You just are.