Such an interesting topic, I typed a long time on it only to start fresh because I was veering too far from the point I think... |
|
What a beautiful thing. It turns jealousy into happiness, and it can turn anger/irritation into wanting to help a person. You don't even have to meditate, just understanding the idea, which is very simple to understand, will accomplish this. Whenever you notice that you are jealous, realise that you actually want this person to be happy. You will enjoy this person's happiness more than you will enjoy his or her suffering, no matter how much you hate him/her. Voila, you are now free to enjoy his or her gift/quality that initially made you jealous. |
|
Last edited by Ginsan; 06-04-2015 at 07:57 AM.
Such an interesting topic, I typed a long time on it only to start fresh because I was veering too far from the point I think... |
|
Last edited by acatalephobic; 06-05-2015 at 06:32 AM.
"you will not transform this house of prayer into a house of thieves"
I'm a little sleepy and I'll read/think/write again when I sleep and wake up so if I'm not making much sense and saying very little with too much text now wait half a day and I might have something better |
|
Last edited by Ginsan; 06-05-2015 at 08:12 AM.
My whole thing is this: |
|
Last edited by acatalephobic; 06-05-2015 at 10:05 AM.
"you will not transform this house of prayer into a house of thieves"
Clutter it with as much kitsch as you want |
|
Last edited by Ginsan; 06-05-2015 at 10:19 AM.
I guess what it does for me is remind me that.. |
|
Last edited by acatalephobic; 06-05-2015 at 10:47 AM.
"you will not transform this house of prayer into a house of thieves"
I love that one xD It also reminded me of this thing I sometimes do. You should try it too. Start laughing out loud (for no apparent reason) and hysterically, for like 20 seconds and try to mean it. Sometimes something clicks and the silliness of it will actually make you laugh, once I did this for minutes and me and 3 friends were laughing together |
|
Last edited by Ginsan; 06-05-2015 at 11:16 AM.
Oh man, I HAVE tried this! |
|
"you will not transform this house of prayer into a house of thieves"
I was reading a book by a psychologist named Daniel Kahneman a few weeks ago and he described experiments in which he made people hold a pencil in their mouth either vertically or horizontally. Holding it horizontally makes your face resemble a smile and holding it vertically makes it resemble a frown. Or they just made people frown their eyebrows. Then they showed people funny things and annoying things, all kinds of things and the frowning people were always less amused/more easily irritated and the smiling (horizontal hold) people were more easily amused/less irritated. It's a very interesting book btw, it is called "Thinking fast, thinking slow" and you might want to watch his lectures to get a good taste of his work. Here is a little video so you can find out if you are interested "Daniel Kahneman: Thinking Fast vs. Thinking Slow | Inc. Magazine" |
|
Last edited by Ginsan; 06-06-2015 at 02:07 AM.
I want to add something that should have been in the first post. |
|
Remember any time (or many times) someone has shown you compassion in your own life. |
|
"you will not transform this house of prayer into a house of thieves"
But it's difficult. Without meditating my mind is out of control. I get overwhelmed by anger and boredom very often and very easily. Just thinking about when someone showed kindness is not enough for me. |
|
Great topic. I do, however, think that some form of mind training is necessary to awaken our compassion on a regular basis--whether that be breath meditation, tong len, lojong, or some other practice to prepare the mind to respond compassionately to phenomena we perceive as difficult or trying. For instance, without preparing myself through meditation, it might be difficult to respond with compassion if someone insults me (or my ideas, or anything I perceive as being mine or having an impact on me), as opposed to reacting in anger. |
|
Stephen LaBerge's tips for MILD: (http://www.dreamviews.com/lucid-expe...ml#post2160952
I don't think compassion requires you to put someone else before yourself. Enjoying other people's company is a much better way to enjoy your own life than not enjoying other people's company. I feel like I may be nitpicking here, and I agree with the rest of your post, but I think it's worth pointing this little thing out, that compassion and kindness aren't noble at all, it's simply a more effective way to enjoy your life. This also makes it much easier to adopt. Nobility is setting the bar too high I think. |
|
I have to disagree with your equating compassion with "enjoying other people's company." If the only goal for your "compassion" is to enjoy people, then once those people are no longer enjoyable, you will abandon them to seek better company. That would be the opposite of compassion. A compassionate response involves putting ourself to the side in order to bring happiness to others. Otherwise our "compassion " is self-serving and egotistical. And it will lead to selfish responses (which aren't compassionate, and which will actually bring us unhappiness). You are right that compassion has many positive side effects for the person being compassionate (which is why in Buddhism we refer to it as the "twofold benefit"), but the desire must be an earnest desire to help beings, and not to just seek the feel-good aspects of compassion. As I said before, this kind of compassion would be very limited, and in some ways even absurd. I think Joseph Goldstein would agree with me. What am I missing, Ginsan? |
|
Stephen LaBerge's tips for MILD: (http://www.dreamviews.com/lucid-expe...ml#post2160952
I think of compassion in terms of non-duality. To feel compassion is to recognize that another person (or any being) also feels. They appreciate the same things that you appreciate, like kindness. And they suffer the same things that you suffer, like fear. So starting from a dualistic interpretation, one might initially describe it as "seeing yourself in another person." But how can "the Self" be in another? The essence of "the Self" is "not other." This can be a helpful paradox. It forces one to reconsider the sense of self. I think starting from this premise avoids the trap of being conflicted as to whether compassion is self-serving or not. |
|
I am sure about illusion. I am not so sure about reality.
|
|
Stephen LaBerge's tips for MILD: (http://www.dreamviews.com/lucid-expe...ml#post2160952
I think I agree with you. And you gave me a new insight, but I have to grapple with this and I don't know how to properly put it into words, but I'll try. Thinking in terms of "putting others before yourself" or "helping others so you can get a good vibe" is delusional. Basically there is no self to put here or there. This makes sense if you consider non-duality as your ultimate goal. |
|
Last edited by Ginsan; 06-09-2015 at 05:20 PM.
Bookmarks