* Definitely dream signs. Examples of realistic ones - "flying pigs" aren't a common dreamsign |
|
This is a thread to keep our plans for the book. This post will be edited as information is updated. Our progress, plans, and important news should be posted here. If you feel like discussing something, try the general discussion thread first. |
|
Last edited by Kromoh; 04-03-2008 at 02:33 AM. Reason: updating information
Saying quantum physics explains cognitive processes is just like saying geology explains jurisprudence.
* Definitely dream signs. Examples of realistic ones - "flying pigs" aren't a common dreamsign |
|
Last edited by Sugarglider11; 10-21-2007 at 05:12 PM. Reason: easier to read
<- Thread title. |
|
Last edited by Jeff777; 06-28-2009 at 10:00 PM.
Things are not as they seem
Deano, I'm not sure what your schedule is like today, but could you help me go through the current chapters and project sketch in this forum and see what we could tweak, add etc. and where we could go from there? |
|
Things are not as they seem
I was just about to make some suggestions to it. |
|
|
|
Do you think the chapters should be shared out between the writers? |
|
I think that's a good idea. They should have subject topics in which to talk about. It will be proofread in depth before anything becomes final though. Although it was covered in Laberge's book, I think the basics should still be covered in the beginning portions as well. Also I think adding a chapter on supplements would be a great one (I might write that one). |
|
Things are not as they seem
I'm stickying this thread, it doesn't need to get lost in the forth coming threads. Also merged the brainstorming thread with project sketch. |
|
Last edited by Jeff777; 06-28-2009 at 10:35 PM.
Things are not as they seem
1. What we need to do, is shoot for a book around 60 - 70 pages. We don't want to burden oruselves down trying to get a 200 page book published. |
|
Things are not as they seem
Do you think there should be a PDF option for people who cannot afford the book? |
|
My suggestion is that we have a chapter, or perhaps implement in an already established chapter, as many real lucid dreams as necessary (from our own boards, our dream journals) to give a concrete example of what it is to lucid dream. A template, even. |
|
Starry starry night, paint your pallet blue and gray,
Look out on a summers day,
with eyes that know the darkness of my soul.
There are a number of major approaches to lucid dreaming and each given approach carries its own assumptions and philosophies on what works in lucid dreaming, what doesn’t work, even what lucid dreaming in itself means. |
|
Paul is Dead
Spockman, I agree with you totally. However, I do believe it's paramount to, first of all, explain what a technique is consisted of, how is it different from other techniques, why it works (in scientific terms); and only then do we talk about the different approaches/variations of the same technique. Any wake-induced technique bases on a common factor, which is falling asleep consciously, but there are dozens of different ways to do it. |
|
Saying quantum physics explains cognitive processes is just like saying geology explains jurisprudence.
Bookmarks