 Originally Posted by Tlaloc
Apologies if this reply is a bit warped - just returned from my kids school disco! (If you're a parent you'll know these things are often loaded with subsidised drink from the adults!).
Thought I'd jam another 2cents in the slot as its an interesting thread. Regarding incorporation of stimuli into dreams - again theres been a reasonable amount of research into this - both inside and outside of lucid dreaming, infact if you go outside of lucid dreaming research theres a lot more information. Anyway Hearne (who invented the 'original' dream machine) did quite a lot of research on this, and some of its really interesting. He was trying to get people lucid through incorporation of stimuli. Anyway he tried various stimuli - small samples (his Liverpool uni Phd) so maybe not that scientific but still of value - he tried smells, and light and tape recordings and tactile stimulation. He found that a water spray to the body gave the greatest INCORPORATION into the dream scene when applied in REM sleep - but resulted in zero lucidity. The reason being the spray got indirectly incorporated - people had dreams of people spitting on them, raining on them, urine - all sorts of odd incorporations of water but never direct enough to make the dreamer lucid. He settled on electro-tactile stimulation of the wrist in a series of pulses as a better stimulus - less total incorporation but when it was incorporated it was much more likely that the dreamer recognized the stimuli and became lucid.
that seems to me to be the key thing - just getting the stimuli incorporated isn't enough. Its as much, or more, about how directly the cue is incorporated into the dream.
As to my own experience with the vibrating alarm, and also harkening back to Herne and La Berges experiences with vibration - 2 days training is more than enough in daytime practice. After that - you're set, it really is that straight forward. From using the vibration on my ankle the only confusions I really had was once or twice I felt the vibration in a dream and mistoke it for a vibrating cell, or I dreamt I was programming the clock and it was vibrating (a sort of FA). But 80% of the time it was (and is) directly incorporated. Well - to qualify - sometimes the brain changes the vibration length or adds sound - so occasionally you can become lucid just by noticing a difference in the type of vibration. La Berge had good success with vibration induced lucid dreamer but didn't go further due to 'technical issues' at the time. Herne developed his machine but it never went commercial.
I think this group look like they've on to a good thing. So perhaps the time for a vibrating cue really has come. Regarding the habituation issue..... hopefully it might not be an issue with a REM detecting based device. I am happy to discuss this if you are interested dreambh - you could pm me. In short in my experience (a sample of one I'm afraid!) you need to perform some sort of activity whenever you encounter the signal - awake or asleep - as Sageous alluded to - using an EILD is not a passive experience, become passive and you will lose the ability to become lucid once the novelty of the stimulus wears off.
I will likely be PMing you Tlaloc. The other night I tried an actigraphy based REM detecting app that allowed vibration of my iPhone which I had strapped to my wrist, and I had and AWESOME OBE/WILD experience. So I became a believer in the whole vibration as a trigger thing and went out and bought a Fitbit Charge. Problem there is it vibrates a bit too long so wakes me too much.
Would definitely be interested in your thoughts and what you used for vibration around your ankle, etc.
As for the Oneirics project that failed, they failed because they blew the marketing angle of this thing. It appeals only to us hardcore geeks who already KNOW how awesome Lucid Dreaming is. I have analyzed a bunch of these failed campaigns, and have helped a buddy script his own KS campaign that got funded, the failure is not the idea, it is getting people jazzed about it.
|
|
Bookmarks