Check this video out on how Bush agenda is similar to Hitlers.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=12pwkeVk7B8&feature=user
Printable View
Check this video out on how Bush agenda is similar to Hitlers.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=12pwkeVk7B8&feature=user
:roll: Yeah, Bush wants to take over the world with an oppressive form of government and kill all non-whites, crippled, sick, and opposition. But he has not liberated as many countries as Hitler did. I'm sure you're quaking in your boots that Bush is going to take you over.
I am just telling you guys of this video to see some common traits they have. Im not saying they are identical in their views. Its not really bush who wants to take over the world. Other people have that ambition. BTW have you heard of the amero?
Good thing hes going out of office next year.
Bush is a terrorist, but not a genocidal maniac.
Had President Clinton went to a war, any war he would be a terrorist, a Hitler.
But instead I guess he is more similar to John Holmes. :shakehead: I guess we would have to ask an intern instead of a senior military adviser.
... and here I was hoping to see a thread about George and Adolph duking it out.
My money would be on Adolph, assuming we get him in his prime.
He didn't declare war on abstractions, but it's not like the military was sitting on its hands during the Clinton administration. The difference is, Clinton didn't take advantage of a massive tragedy to enact standing invasion plans against a non-aggressor, on the basis that they might be trying to acquire materials that they could, someday maybe, turn into weapons that they might want to use against us. Which turned out to be false.Quote:
Originally Posted by Howie
Basically, Saddam wouldn't lay down on his belly and admit he was defenseless, so we leveled Baghdad. It isn't just 'any war.'
Do they get weapons, or bare knuckle? It's a tough call...I suspect both of them would run like hell at the prospect of personal, physical harm. We'd have to tie their shoelaces together and throw them over a clothesline.Quote:
Originally Posted by skysaw
Bill Clinton's legacy is 9/11. If he had had a preventative mentality like Bush has, 9/11 would not have happened.Quote:
Originally Posted by Taosaur
Yeah, except for the trying to conquer the world, facist dictatorship and the whole "Holocaust" thing.
Wait, didn't Clinton warn Bush of intelligence of a possible attack on the twin towers, as did an FBI agent? Bush chose to ignore them.
Your statement makes no sense. Osama Bin Laden hated America long before Clinton, didn't the first twin towers attack happen during the first Bush administration?
Yeah, cuz then he would have brought Bin Laden to justice just like Bush di..er, oh yeah, Bush fumbled that, too.Quote:
Originally Posted by Universal Mind
this is sooooooo 4 years ago.
Bush did not know that airplanes were going to hit the World Trade Center. He did not ignore anything.Quote:
Originally Posted by ninja9578
I never said Bill Clinton made Bin Laden hate the U.S. I don't know where you got that.
Clinton had four chances to kill Bin Laden. He also pulled that Somalia withdrawal stunt, which is what Bin Laden said convinced him we are a "paper tiger" and can therefore be defeated. I'm glad Bush changed Usama's mind about that.Quote:
Originally Posted by Taosaur
Exactly. I don't like Bush, but that's a stupid video.Quote:
Originally Posted by Universal Mind