Thread: The Katana

Originally Posted by Oneironaut

tactics

You're right. They sure don't use those crazy things in modern combat. These days they just run at each other with big knives and sticks and hack away until the others are dead... Oh, wait.

Originally Posted by Mark75

You're right. They sure don't use those crazy things in modern combat. These days they just run at each other with big knives and sticks and hack away until the others are dead... Oh, wait.

Wow. You focused on that one word like it was the only thing that I said in that entire post. That's kind of left field, even for you.

My point was that you tried to paint the picture of a "romantic" being more likely to choose a rock over a katana, because of simplicity, unilaterally asserting that it's probably not as effective (which is the only thing I could get out of your sarcasm). I was simply saying that a rock can be just as deadly as a katana. In saying so, I was negating your assertion that a "romantic" would choose one of those over the other. The only difference between the two was the tactics in how the wielder used them. What does any of that have to do with comparing them to modern combat?

Or were you just trying to make a point that wasn't really relevant? Hmmm....

Originally Posted by Oneironaut

a rock can be just as deadly

But guns make you even more dead.

There's no such thing a "more dead." If you're not "all the way dead," you're not dead.

Originally Posted by Oneironaut

There's no such thing a "more dead." If you're not "all the way dead," you're not dead.

"There's a big difference between mostly dead and all dead. Mostly dead is slightly alive. With all dead, well, with all dead there's usually only one thing you can do." - Miracle Max

And I'd have to say a staff of some sort. Anything from a cane or short walking stick to a quarterstaff is my kind of weapon. I'm with Teddy: speak softly but carry a big stick. And a knife. Or three.