Quote Originally Posted by Hominus View Post
I thought you were my homie!!![/b]
Lol. We're still homies. We just disagree on a few things.

Maybe YOU should do some reading. It is prolonged smoke inhalation that hurts you. Not a little bit.[/b]
What if I want to go to a bar every night? Shouldn't I be allowed to do that without damaging my lungs AND my liver? Non-smokers visit bars as much as smokers. If I'm in a smokey bar most days out of the week, I'd be negatively affected by the smoke. If I go to a bar once a month and stay a few hours? Then you're more likely to be right and I probably wouldn't suffer a damn bit except while I was there.

There is no evidence of global warming. NONE. Just because the earth is heating up doesnt mean its because of cars and other stuff. For all we know it could just be the earth following its normal cycle of heating up and cooling down. What do you think melted the ice of the latest ice age. I base my logic on geological functions that are proven, not by what Al Gore (hippie liberal douchebag) says. [/b]
Thing is, dude, global warming just means the globe is, well, warming. WHY it's warming is a question that can't be answered 100% accurately, like you're saying, but we do know that carbon dioxide in the atmosphere increases the planet's overall temperatures. We also know that vehicles, many factories, and other human creations, as well as natural things, emit those gasses. While the earth may be warming because that's the way it works, that doesn't mean humans didn't have anything to do with it, when we've been pumping CO2 all around it at a rate the earth couldn't compensate for.

Fact is, the earth's warming up. What are all the reasons for it? Probably a lot more than we think about on a regular basis. Besides, it's the scientists who talk about global warming who are also the ones who point out that the earth has cycles of warming and cooling. It's not as though you're making some amazing argument against the science of global warming. The earth is warming up and that's probably going to be a problem for us humans. There's no point in continuing to pump CO2 into the atmosphere when we KNOW that if it does anything to the situation, it probably makes it worse. Does it necessarily make it worse? Maybe not... maybe it's at the point where it's just going to keep getting warmer and warmer regardless of what we do to slow it, but the more CO2 that is in the atmosphere, the more time it will take the planet to recover from it. And the planet will recover, we have no doubt of that... it's the human recovery that scientists are worried about.

George Bush says there were nukes in Iraq ON THE NEWS. False[/b]
Some conservative you are... I thought all you weirdos were supposed to believe everything Bush said as though it were Divine. j/k. I haven't liked Bush since he first came through. Oh, and I don't watch the news.. I read scientific journals and discuss things with educated persons, listen to the radio every once in a while, and try to formulate my own opinions.

HAVE YOU EVER SEEN THE NEWS. It is full of lies, misconceptions, and anything that is popular at the time and not on credibility. [/b]
Duh. That's part of the reason I don't watch it. The news also doesn't give enough information to make people any wiser. In fact, it's laughable when I think that some people might expect that of the television, news, whatever.

I never said i know what second hand smoke can do, and neither do you[/b]
Actually, you said that there is no evidence that second hand smoke does ANYTHING bad to people. In that, you're wrong, and there is evidence easily accessible.

About tsunamis, carcinogens, and the sun. Kiss my ass. I simply cover both sides of an argument that cannot be proven by either side, including global warming. You'd probably tell me that UFO's do exist and they put probes in peoples asses.[/b]
I'd rather not kiss your ass.. I think you pull too much out of it. (haha, I made a funny). You're not actually covering both sides of controversial arguments though... you're arguing things that obviously have proof for them, on both sides. It's not so black and white, which I think you know and is the reason you argue like you do. Problem is, you're talking about things as though they have NO evidence when they obviously do.

What, you haven't been anally probed by the aliens? I think you're lying! Maybe you ARE one of the aliens!

Anyhow, you'd sound a lot more credible if you actually pointed to some of the evidence on either side of an argument you're making instead of saying that one side has no evidence when they obviously do.