Do you have a fetish?

**Original Poster** · 02-08-2012 08:37 PM

O rly?

**Supernova** · 02-08-2012 08:45 PM

Originally Posted by Pensive Patrick

What about ponies? I'm not actually joking, I'm genuinely interested in the psychology of teens/adults who like MLP, and I'm wondering if there's a sexual element to it?

Rule 34, my friend. I've seen it. It is disturbing. :/

Originally Posted by Omnis Dei

Who here knows their proper -philia label?

You can look it up here: List of paraphilias - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Perhaps 7, to varying degrees.

**Arra** · 02-08-2012 08:56 PM

Well, the ponies themselves aren't children. They are teenagers, at least. Their faces are strangely expressive and a couple (Rarity and Fluttershy) I must admit are quite beautiful. Also, they have nice asses, with elevated tails which make them appear ready for mounting. I experience no sexual inclination toward them, but I'm mostly straight, and perhaps I would if I were male.

Now, I feel uncomfortable mentioning this, but I have always been sexually inclined toward submission and dominance. I have hinted that in this thread before but don't know if I've stated it explicitly. There's no need to be more specific than that. I used to find myself only on the submissive side, but lately have found myself capable of being on either side. Also, mind-melding types of things. Often activities occur in shared lucid dreams. Not real, just in my mind. I almost feel like I'm talking like labrynt right now, although I hope I make more sense, just a similar mindset.

**Linkzelda** · 02-08-2012 09:02 PM

Quote Originally Posted by Omnis Dei View Post
Who here knows their proper -philia label?

You can look it up here: List of paraphilias - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

1-4 probably. The rest I was surprised that actually have a philia.

Spoiler for *whistles innocently*:

**Erii** · 02-08-2012 09:16 PM

Originally Posted by Dianeva

Well, the ponies themselves aren't children. They are teenagers, at least. Their faces are strangely expressive and a couple (Rarity and Fluttershy) I must admit are quite beautiful. Also, they have nice asses, with elevated tails which make them appear ready for mounting. I experience no sexual inclination toward them, but I'm mostly straight, and perhaps I would if I were male.

/giggles

**Patrick** · 02-08-2012 10:04 PM

Originally Posted by Dianeva

I almost feel like I'm talking like labrynt right now

Not quite. Less grammar, less spelling, less sense, more words.

**Arra** · 02-08-2012 10:06 PM

Quote miner.

**Patrick** · 02-08-2012 10:09 PM

Originally Posted by Dianeva

Quote miner.

What's a quote miner?

**Arra** · 02-08-2012 10:13 PM

I'd try to give you a definition, but I don't think I'd be capable of doing that without mining whatever definition I quoted, rendering it false.

Also, if you're trying to be ironic in some other way by saying what you just said, it's gone over my head.

**Patrick** · 02-08-2012 10:15 PM

Sowwy, I'll try not to quote mine in future. I had no idea it was such blasphemy

**Arra** · 02-08-2012 10:17 PM

It's fine, I was joking. I seem to appear not to be joking when I am.

But now I'm paranoid that you're making some joke that I'm not not catching. Damn those knowing smileys.

**Patrick** · 02-08-2012 10:26 PM

Haha OK I wasn't actually joking or being ironic or anything. Just got lost in translation.

Now what was the topic of this thread again...?

**~~Alyzarin~~** · 02-08-2012 10:39 PM

I've honestly never seen MLP, but this is starting to make me think I should check it out.

I used to use a fantasy fairly often about turning into a pony, and another about being being eaten by one.

**labyrint** · 02-08-2012 10:43 PM

I think I just got actual punch to my stomack (not a figure of speech) though I was laughting, I also have some memories of this one partner I was with for a long time. She's still amashed how I can after all these years took seriously it when shes joking. Offcourse she always started as to fool me, but at some point she lost in to act. Then we had a good drama going when I hadn't realised she was making fun at the first place and she'd forgotten she started it as a joke. Oh, good old times

Besides the problem is that I know Grammar, It's made in Rome (Empire not the City)

**OpheliaBlue** · 02-09-2012 02:01 AM

Originally Posted by Omnis Dei

Who here knows their proper -philia label?

You can look it up here: List of paraphilias - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Unless I missed it, I didn't see mine: pretending to be the guy (to the point where I imagine I'm the guy, with another guy).

You know, I was kinda dissapointed that I didn't see objectum sexuality on there. That's where you love, like, a wall or something. There was a woman who married the Berlin Wall, even changed her last name to Berlin Mauer. And another who married the Eiffel Tower, same shit, french sack. Although it was Mrs. Eiffel who had a miniature tower constructed for her bath time and bed time. Apparently Asperger's may be inclined to fall in love with, and become sexually aroused by inanimate objects.

I am definitely NOT objectum sexual. I like fresh meat. My latest fantasy, no way my bf would EVER do it, but I want for a guy to lie on the bed, I sit on top of the guy, facing away from him. Then I want my bf to do the guy, while facing me and making out with me. So like, Danny and I are making out, and we're each doing the same guy, but not actually doing eachother. I like the idea of making the 3rd party just an object, a piece of meat. Maybe even tie him up. I don't know how I came up with this, but when I think about it, purrrrrrrr.

**~~Alyzarin~~** · 02-09-2012 02:03 AM

Originally Posted by OpheliaBlue

Unless I missed it, I didn't see mine: pretending to be the guy (to the point where I imagine I'm the guy, with another guy).

You know, I was kinda dissapointed that I didn't see objectum sexuality on there. That's where you love, like, a wall or something. There was a woman who married the Berlin Wall, even changed her last name to Berlin Mauer. And another who married the Eiffel Tower, same shit, french sack. Although it was Mrs. Eiffel who had a miniature tower constructed for her bath time and bed time. Apparently Asperger's may be inclined to fall in love with, and become sexually aroused by inanimate objects.

I am definitely NOT objectum sexual. I like fresh meat. My latest fantasy, no way my bf would EVER do it, but I want for a guy to lie on the bed, I sit on top of the guy, facing away from him. Then I want my bf to do the guy, while facing me and making out with me. So like, Danny and I are making out, and we're each doing the same guy, but not actually doing eachother. I like the idea of making the 3rd party just an object, a piece of meat. Maybe even tie him up. I don't know how I came up with this, but when I think about it, purrrrrrrr.

It's on there, autoandrophilia.

I believe objectum sexuals wish to be seen as having their own sexual orientation, don't they? They say that they actually love objects, not just are turned on by them, and not either human sex or anything like that. From what I've heard there seems to be some merit to the claim, though I may be wrong. But most of them believe that objects have spirits and stuff like that, so they actually can return love. If that's the case then it would be wrong or at least rude to list it on a page of fetishes.

**OldNutter** · 02-09-2012 02:21 AM

Originally Posted by OpheliaBlue

You know, I was kinda dissapointed that I didn't see objectum sexuality on there. That's where you love, like, a wall or something. There was a woman who married the Berlin Wall, even changed her last name to Berlin Mauer. And another who married the Eiffel Tower, same shit, french sack. Although it was Mrs. Eiffel who had a miniature tower constructed for her bath time and bed time. Apparently Asperger's may be inclined to fall in love with, and become sexually aroused by inanimate objects.

Damn She must of been devastated when they tore it down.

**~~Alyzarin~~** · 02-09-2012 02:23 AM

Originally Posted by OldSparta

Damn She must of been devastated when they tore it down.

Oh wow, I didn't think about that, she probably was.

Objectum sexuals actually think of the objects on the same level as people.

**OpheliaBlue** · 02-09-2012 02:26 AM

Originally Posted by OldSparta

Damn She must of been devastated when they tore it down.

LOL she was! In the article abotu it, she said that they mutilated her husband.

Aly: yeah you're right, I forgot that they talked about how they feel that the objects have souls. It's an actual loving relationship, which would make it more of an orientation than a fetish, you're right. Wow it's nuts, but those women seemed really happy and content. Well except for Widow Berlin-Mauer of course. I read that later, she started to have feelings for a garden fence (NO LIE).

**~~Alyzarin~~** · 02-09-2012 02:31 AM

Originally Posted by OpheliaBlue

LOL she was! In the article abotu it, she said that they mutilated her husband.

Aly: yeah you're right, I forgot that they talked about how they feel that the objects have souls. It's an actual loving relationship, which would make it more of an orientation than a fetish, you're right. Wow it's nuts, but those women seemed really happy and content. Well except for Widow Berlin-Mauer of course. I read that later, she started to have feelings for a garden fence (NO LIE).

Yeah, all the objectum sexuals I've seen seemed perfectly happy. And I believe the garden fence thing, I've seen some of them try to explain it before and they say that in the same way there are stereotypically attractive traits in men and women, objects have certain features that make them more appealing. Things that involve straight architecture and/or repetitive designs, like fences and bridges and the Eiffel Tower, seem to be particularly attractive. They can love other objects too, but those seem to be the big kinds. I tried it once, I stared at a ruler for a couple minutes. I honestly felt that I could say I found something strangely appealing about its shape, but I don't think I can understand the full spectrum of objectum sexuality.

**labyrint** · 02-09-2012 02:37 AM

I actually believe her love tear the wall down. In some subconscious way, dreamsoulway or even conciously she might have felt herself as another side of the Town: Berlin. If we are to see autoandrophiacs cabable to see spirit or 'stuff' in inanimate objects and their emotions or love coming back from them (this is not a crazy thought to me vice verse, this is how I see world dayly if not in too dry[spell] state: in panteistic or animistic way,, also shamanistic and old religions as well as some mystics of other religions and dreamers too see the world as such) they can connect to spirit of whole town. In this sense some Berlinian woman might have felt very correctly how she is missing her other side, and rather than hating the wall in between she loved it to ruins.

DEIT BTW: now we are diggin the roots of fetish as 'magical object that transends the experince'... i've felt that ppl have dodged the definition for it is somehow strange rather than kinky, some may have felt it takes the sexuality of fetish away, but if you study some indigenious fetishes you'll see that they had rich and sexual tone in it as well as connection to everything... it's after some religious structures that shame was added as the coating of the dress

**~~Alyzarin~~** · 02-09-2012 02:39 AM

Originally Posted by labyrint

I actually believe her love tear the wall down. In some subconscious way, dreamsoulway or even conciously she might have felt herself as another side of the Town: Berlin. If we are to see autoandrophiacs cabable to see spirit or 'stuff' in inanimate objects and their emotions or love coming back from them (this is not a crazy thought to me vice verse, this is how I see world dayly if not in too dry[spell] state: in panteistic or animistic way,, also shamanistic and old religions as well as some mystics of other religions and dreamers too see the world as such) they can connect to spirit of whole town. In this sense some Berlinian woman might have felt very correctly how she is missing her other side, and rather than hating the wall in between she loved it to ruins.

A wonderful post as usual, but one thing. When I said autoandrophilia, I was referring to a women attracted to the thought of themselves as men.

**OpheliaBlue** · 02-09-2012 02:40 AM

She loved it to ruins.

That's kinda, sad actually.

**labyrint** · 02-09-2012 02:47 AM

srry, it was objectum sexual.. guess the archaic version would just be Fetishshist

@ophelia: i saw the sad tone in that figure of speech, but left it there anyhow.. who says that sexuality/love have no sad tones?