Thread: Do you have a fetish?

Japanese girls and rape. Yup.

That's interesting. I can see part of that, my fantasies do have to have a story. Sometimes they're less creative than others but usually that's when I'm just overusing the same general ones. Mine don't really make too much logical sense because so many of mine revolve around things that just aren't possible, like the vore, but they do have to make some kind of sense in the context of the story, in their own illogical way. That's where things like having people be possessed when they eat me come in, it generally has to have me being a victim so in a way it relates to some other, more plausible fetishes.

Though, sometimes all my mind needs to justify a story is the thought that I can bend reality, which is probably why my fantasies are so varied and often bizarre. I usually don't leave out any angles if I keep with something long enough. Like vore, like I said I have fantasies from both perspectives, though it's always a girl doing the eating (so me eating or being eaten by them), and if I'm doing the eating I'm usually eating a guy. But I've also expanded on it in other ways, like thinking of it as consensual and non-consensual, having it lead to different fantasies based on story like ones about death or possession (both sides of that, too), and even through... other orifices.

Originally Posted by XeL

Japanese girls and rape. Yup.

+Groping in Trains/Buses

Can be a thrill trying to get things done before the train/bus reaches the destination. The silent moans as she tries her best to not make the passengers hear her. Better hope she doesn't have to go to the bathroom...bad results...

Too bad I can't actually do it...but watc--nvm.

I love the internet... this is so deliciously weird

I think some of yall are confused as to what constitutes a fetish.

I fantasize about two guys having sex, usually with a complex story involved, though it doesn't have to be too logical, I do think about how it should be probable. Luckily, I am nowhere in the equation, because I really don't want to fantasize about myself... or another chick...

Originally Posted by DeeryTheDeer

I fantasize about two guys having sex, usually with a complex story involved, though it doesn't have to be too logical, I do think about how it should be probable. Luckily, I am nowhere in the equation, because I really don't want to fantasize about myself... or another chick...

Which reminds me, I was supposed to watch some yaoi today. I better get on that.

Originally Posted by dave1701

I think some of yall are confused as to what constitutes a fetish.

Yeah, that was made clear early on in the thread. It's become more of a thread for mentioning your sexual preferences or kinks. If it was kept strictly to fetishes, this thread wouldn't get much traffic, because actual fetishes are rare.

Originally Posted by DeeryTheDeer

I fantasize about two guys having sex, usually with a complex story involved, though it doesn't have to be too logical, I do think about how it should be probable. Luckily, I am nowhere in the equation, because I really don't want to fantasize about myself... or another chick...

That's just something that would never do anything for me, although I do find two guys making out to be hot. Mine almost always involve exactly one male and one female.

^^ I guess I'm actually closer to that, because I love guys making out and even especially if they're naked and stuff but not really... having sex. I'm not sure why the line is drawn there lol. But that's why I like softcore yaoi, too. :3

Actually, despite my alarmingly large number of kinks, I barely ever think about the actual act of sex. When I do, it has to be between me and someone who I actually do feel really strongly about, or it doesn't get anywhere at all. And thus far it has to be a guy, even though I do feel sexually attracted to other girls strongly enough to want to do pretty much everything up to sex. I guess I just haven't felt that strongly about any yet.

Originally Posted by dave1701

I think some of yall are confused as to what constitutes a fetish.

I'm not sure anyone knows. All the words that are used to describe sexual things are so prone to having their meanings utterly raped (see what I did there) and used in wrong ways. And I don't think the definition of a fetish makes much sense. Let's look at some, yes? (Have we done this in this thread before?)

Originally Posted by Google dictionary:

1. An inanimate object worshiped for its supposed magical powers or because it is considered to be inhabited by a spirit

2. A course of action to which one has an excessive and irrational commitment
"he had a fetish for writing more opinions each year than any other justice"

3. A form of sexual desire in which gratification is linked to an abnormal degree to a particular object, item of clothing, part of the body, etc

The first one is a different meaning, so we can write that one off. The second one is at the same time so vague that almost everything in this thread can fit into it, but at the same time it is extremely limited when it only includes "courses of action". To this definition, a foot fetish cannot exist unless it is some kind of action involving feet that is the fetish.

The third definition seems the most right. With this definition, a fetish is a sexual attraction to objects, clothes and body parts, etc. So I guess here we can easily fit the foot fetish in. How about breasts? I mean, breasts are non-sexual body parts, but the definition says it has to be "to an abnormal degree"? And I'd say attraction to breasts is normal, so that one isn't a fetish? Well, who knows whether an attraction to feet is abnormal, then? I think I heard somewhere that foot fetish is the most common fetish right next to breasts. Well that's conflicting a little bit with the definition. But wait...
"etc"

What the fuck? "etc"? Really? You're just gonna casually stick et cetera into a definition? Shouldn't a defintion be clear and precise? When you stick et cetera at the end, you can include god damn everything.
Not to mention, this example is included on that very definition: "common male fetishes are breasts, legs, hair, shoes, and underwear"

I'm finding that very unhelpful... Let's move on to wikipedia and wikitionary!

Originally Posted by wikitionary

fetish (plural fetishes)

1. Something which is believed to possess, contain, or cause spiritual or magical powers; an amulet or a talisman. [from the early 17th c.]
2. Something sexual or nonsexual, such as an object or a part of the body which arouses sexual desire or is necessary for one to reach full sexual satisfaction. [from the early 19th c.]
3. (US) An irrational, or abnormal fixation or preoccupation. [from the 19th c.]

Again we can right off the first one right away, as that is the second meaning of the word. The second one is more specific, and I think that's the one I agree with the most. But this one leaves out 'fetishes' that are about specific actions and fantasies like dying, being eaten (Well that one is a paraphilia, a whole different can of worms) and the likes. But on the other hand, you could interpret it as including everything, because with this definition it just has to be "something [...] which arouses sexual desire" So basically, everything sexual is a fetish.
The third one is marks every single obsession as a fetish. It doesn't have to be sexual either.

But wait, let's look at what wikitionary says about "fetishism".

Originally Posted by wikitionary

fetishism (countable and uncountable; plural fetishisms)
2. a form of paraphilia where the object of attraction is an inanimate object or a part of a person's body.

Wait, what? Out of nowhere, fetishes are suddenly paraphilias. I'm not going to do the same shit to the word "paraphilia", I've done that lots of times before and it induces the same mindfuck of ambiguity as this.

Originally Posted by wikipedia

Sexual fetishism, or erotic fetishism, is the sexual arousal a person receives from a physical object, or from a specific situation.

Here's another definition where every single sexual attraction can be labeled a fetish. Having sex with a woman as a man is a specific situation, yes? And so is having sex with a man. So apperantly even those things we normally call sexual orientations are fetishes. How is that helpful or useful at all? How does that even make sense?

So yes, you're damn right I'm confused as to what constitutes a fetish! I don't think anyone knows, and I think that's because nothing actually seperates fetishes, paraphilias and sexual orientations. Just confused scientists who thought it was a good idea to bring out the labelers when they saw abnormal types of sexualities.

I always thought a fetish was something that you MUST think about in order to climax.

Originally Posted by dave1701

I always thought a fetish was something that you MUST think about in order to climax.

That's the more strict definition, but it's not really the most widely used one. As Dianeva said, it was already decided back near the beginning of this thread that it's fine to go by just having a fetish be something that really turns you on, generally something outside of what would be normal. Which is also what most people mean by it these days anyway. Though, most of my things vary around one or two main underlying themes that it actually is really, really difficult for me to get anywhere without.

Fair enough.

Originally Posted by Wyvern

I'm an enormous vorarephile. It's not some little kink that turns me on. Vore does more for me than anything else.
Vorarephilia - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I don't know why it has this effect on me, it just does. At least it is quite possible in dreams.

What side of the meal do you fantasize yourself on?

I found this Fetish Analyst's website in which a supposed expert gives a 'real' definition. I was ready to hear it and from then on consider that the real definition, but this is what it was.

A fetish is a tangible or intangible object, whether living or dead, which serves as a conduit into a very specific ontological state, often a transcendental state of consciousness. A fetish may be a specific part of a greater object, such as a body part.

*sigh*

I think there are probably a few different types of psychological things going on when it comes to sexual fixation. The unclear definitions result from our inability to determine which mental phenomenon exactly is going on in the minds of other people who have different fetishes. If it's the same strange mental association thing going on when it comes to vore, feet, bdsm, etc. then they should all be labeled with the same name. But if there really is some core psychological difference going on between fixation over actions and fixation over objects, for example, we should have different words for the two.

ehhh one more, rape roleplay

lolz im a masochist (no really)

Originally Posted by mooseantlers

What side of the meal do you fantasize yourself on?

Oh, that depends. It works for me both ways. Nearly any vore situation will turn me on greatly. Sometimes I'm pred, sometimes I'm prey. I do get in certain moods for certain situations though. Actually, it's harder to think of something within the realm of vore that DOESN'T get to me. When it comes to softvore (being swallowed whole) though, I do prefer being shrunken (if I'm prey anyway).

Originally Posted by Wyvern

I'm an enormous vorarephile. It's not some little kink that turns me on. Vore does more for me than anything else.
Vorarephilia - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I don't know why it has this effect on me, it just does. At least it is quite possible in dreams.

-----
I used to think I was into sadomasochism but I eventually realized I wasn't really into inflicting pain/distress, my fantasies always involved comforting someone after the act and that's what got me going. I'm not sure what you'd call it but that's probably my biggest turn on - comforting someone. Laughing/giggling also gets me sprung.

Sometimes when all you find are broken hearts, broken memories, grapewine talks, astronomical distances, traumas and broken dreams.. it's soft and cold way you wan't to proceed.

I can experience the longing off good old time genders towards each other.. and for that, this oversexing and beyond the previuos peek experince culture that goes trans that and trans this has left my love, sex and kink life quite boring, soulless (soulfull only in small whispering way) and dull. I'm all into trans, but for the Gods sake.. let's give them/us/who some vanilla to start with. When have this world gone forbidden for heteroes? Are we any better than Nazis? (yes i have a nazi, gas and twin fetish too)

For that my premices remain as focusing some of those broken parts.. but to make this nearer to dreamlike, I've started with hearth fetish.. gone trough the pictures of broken hearts google gives to me and started to go into latinic terms for cutted heart parts and veins, picked some memories and lifestorysynchs from there.. wen't to wiki to study more about haerts in purest physical sense. So if we wan't to surpass mind working in medical level, from brains, electricity and greaymatter... we must start there and move beoynd biological machinery to psyche (mind~soul) and spirit and forth.. for the sake of those ontological states, and transcendental states that eros should lead

so maybe I watch some house or ally mcbeal
.. or continue my writing duties

EDIT: why aren't here smilie for scalpel, here should be

Cookies and Dominoes (not dominas this time):





yeah, and dread [thread] necromancy (not necrophilia this time):pope:

Originally Posted by labyrint

Sometimes when all you find are broken hearts, broken memories, grapewine talks, astronomical distances, traumas and broken dreams.. it's soft and cold way you wan't to proceed.

I can experience the longing off good old time genders towards each other.. and for that, this oversexing and beyond the previuos peek experince culture that goes trans that and trans this has left my love, sex and kink life quite boring, soulless (soulfull only in small whispering way) and dull. I'm all into trans, but for the Gods sake.. let's give them/us/who some vanilla to start with. When have this world gone forbidden for heteroes? Are we any better than Nazis? (yes i have a nazi, gas and twin fetish too)

For that my premices remain as focusing some of those broken parts.. but to make this nearer to dreamlike, I've started with hearth fetish.. gone trough the pictures of broken hearts google gives to me and started to go into latinic terms for cutted heart parts and veins, picked some memories and lifestorysynchs from there.. wen't to wiki to study more about haerts in purest physical sense. So if we wan't to surpass mind working in medical level, from brains, electricity and greaymatter... we must start there and move beoynd biological machinery to psyche (mind~soul) and spirit and forth.. for the sake of those ontological states, and transcendental states that eros should lead

so maybe I watch some house or ally mcbeal
.. or continue my writing duties

EDIT: why aren't here smilie for scalpel, here should be

Being kissed on the wrist, hearing a guy moan, being shoved up against a wall.

Also, being the guy.

OpheliaBlue

Being kissed on the wrist, hearing a guy moan, being shoved up against a wall.

Also, being the guy.

Spoiler for .:

I don't know if I mentioned this but, I like it when Hispanic Girls speak spanish at like 3x10^26 words a minute.

The deep rolls that create the slight growl sound just makes me go CRAZY. I don't know WHAT THE FUCK they're saying, but god is it hot