Thread: Post pictures of sexy hawt females [NO NUDITY!]

Nice Erii

Originally Posted by Erii

no its because she sexes herself up to look plastic so she knows she can get what she wants from guys who find her attractive because they won't care that she is a bitch because she looks "good".

Basically, she's fake. Her hair is an exaggerated fake color, her skin tone is fake, her boobs are fake, basically everything about her looks fake. Usually, people who are nice and genuine don't do all those fake things to themselves. Just look at guidos with their gel spiked hair, orange fake tan, big muscles (okay not usually fake but still, it all implies something about their ego and where their priorities lie).

Of course I could be totally wrong (now I'm curious enough to look her up on YouTube, lol).

Originally Posted by DeeryTheDeer

Just look at guidos

Don't you dare bring those orange fucktards into this, Deery. D:<
-----
Yulia Volkova:

Originally Posted by GavinGill

Don't you dare bring those orange fucktards into this, Deery. D:<[/IMG]

they are the perfect example as of what i am talking about soooooooooooooooo

Originally Posted by DeeryTheDeer

Basically, she's fake. Her hair is an exaggerated fake color, her skin tone is fake, her boobs are fake, basically everything about her looks fake. Usually, people who are nice and genuine don't do all those fake things to themselves. Just look at guidos with their gel spiked hair, orange fake tan, big muscles (okay not usually fake but still, it all implies something about their ego and where their priorities lie).

Of course I could be totally wrong (now I'm curious enough to look her up on YouTube, lol).

http://www.dreamviews.com/f28/post-p...ml#post1724341

Weren't you blonde, at some point?

I thought this was the Hawt and Sexah females thread, not the Nice and Natural thread....

Ok, proof that fake can be sexy:



























And so can bitchy:



[URL="http://www.hollywoodstarstv.com/views/images/gallery/Shannen_Doherty_59.jpg"]http://www.hollywoodstarstv.com/views/images/gallery/Shannen_Doherty_59.jpg[/IMG]
(Too big, just click the link to see it)

Originally Posted by Oneironaut

http://www.dreamviews.com/f28/post-p...ml#post1724341

Weren't you blonde, at some point?

LOL, I am blonde, in those pictures too. I've always been a dirty "dishwater" blonde, so in those pics that is my natural color, although I did dye my hair dark red once, and then boy-short platinum blonde. So yes, I have occasionally dyed my hair and put on makeup for fun, but not to desperately please a man by changing my entire appearance, including a big boob job and dressing like a prostitute. I also watched a video of her, she's definitely an air-headed, squeaky voiced bimbo. Of course none of this matters in the "sexy hawt females" thread, we're just saying that she seems a bit skanky with nothing else going on up there. Like a dime-a-dozen Vegas stripper.

Pamela Anderson was still hotter before she got all that surgery. Such a nice face.
Now her lips are like fish's.

Originally Posted by DeeryTheDeer

LOL, I am blonde, in those pictures too. I've always been a dirty "dishwater" blonde, so in those pics that is my natural color, although I did dye my hair dark red once, and then boy-short platinum blonde. So yes, I have occasionally dyed my hair and put on makeup for fun, but not to desperately please a man by changing my entire appearance, including a big boob job and dressing like a prostitute. I also watched a video of her, she's definitely an air-headed, squeaky voiced bimbo. Of course none of this matters in the "sexy hawt females" thread, we're just saying that she seems a bit skanky with nothing else going on up there. Like a dime-a-dozen Vegas stripper.

It matters to me!!!!!! Stupid girls. Bitches. Dominating bitches. ugh. I am attracted to girls by who they are. and you can tell who a person is by looking at a picture. I like girl who are nice. I am also wildly attracted to dark girls. I mean inner darkness. And those who have power but do not like to be dominating. Weakness is ok. I feel that is a tendency of the passive nature of females.

Originally Posted by tommo

Pamela Anderson was still hotter before she got all that surgery. Such a nice face.
Now her lips are like fish's.

True, true - but still hot even after countless surgeries. Heh, in fact Pam is what women always hope they end up looking like when they go under the knife and get all injected. Most don't though. Cause like you said, she started out extremely hot.

Prepare for hawtness....



Oliva Wilde:








Yvonne Strahovski:








Scarlett johansson:




Cheryl Cole:




Natalie Imbruglia:




Taylor Swift






Celeste Star:







Tori Black:




Lights Poxleitner:







Emma Stone:





Katy Perry:







/enjoy

Originally Posted by LonelyTurtle

Prepare for hawtness....



Oliva Wilde:

MOAR!!!!!!!!!

Literally cannot get enough of her.

Originally Posted by GavinGill

I realize you made that comment half-jokingly but I'm going to draw from it regardless. If that woman's hair was a different color and she wasn't wearing that shade of lip stick (or lip gloss? idk, I can't tell the difference), she'd have that "sincere and innocent" look down pat. Get Susan Coffey to go blonde, put on that lip gloss, and wear lingerie like that, and she'll look just as "fake."

I recognise your point but if she were to do that, I'd be too busy drooling over her figure rather than giving prejudiced opinions.

Originally Posted by saltyseedog

I am attracted to girls by who they are. and you can tell who a person is by looking at a picture.

Lmao.

IMHO, this whole 'judging a person by a picture of them' is a crock, and really says much more about the person doing the judging than it does about the person in the picture.

That's just me, though.

Originally Posted by LonelyTurtle

Oliva Wilde:

I really can't get over how hot she was in that movie specifically. The look just raises her to a whole new level of hotness. Maybe because she reminds me of Elijah Wood there for some reason, I don't know. Dark hair and huge, blazing eyes. Plus a strong jawline.

Originally Posted by DeeryTheDeer

but not to desperately please a man by changing my entire appearance, including a big boob job and dressing like a prostitute.

To say nothing of your declaration that you will no longer photoshop your acne out of your pictures (why did you do that, in the first place?). And your - quite popular - camel toe picture in the underwear thread wasn't exactly conservative, was it?

And please don't take that personally. () I'm not digging at you for any pictures you've taken, or for clearing up acne with photoshop. I'm just giving you a hard time, to make a point. We all have our pet peeves. Cattiness just happens to be one of mine. I happen to know very sweet, genuine girls who are also caught up in being 'trendy' (platinum blonde hair, excessive tans, etc.). And while I can understand how such physical appearance can turn some people off, I also understand that to imply that you somehow 'know' someone by a picture of them, or the way they color their hair, or wear their clothes (especially when they are modelling) really just exposes bias, because the truth remains: No matter how much you (read as: anyone) think you have things figured out, you can not truly judge a person by a picture of them, especially when that person is a model and/or otherwise 'posing' for a picture. Believe me, nothing turns me off more than a truly bitchy, fake-ass woman. But I know enough to know that it usually takes more than a picture to find out that much about a person, to start talking shit about them. And when I see hypocrisy on things like this - which is even worse - I just kind of shake my head.

Merely my two cents, though. Feel free to disagree.

Edited with apologies to Deery - didn't mean to be disrespectful.

Originally Posted by Darkmatters

Dammit O!!
You HAD to make me go look up that cameltoe shot when I'm trying to argue feminism with Deery??

Lmao. While I find this hilarious, I don't want to imply that I'm trying to draw any unwanted attention to Deery for the photo. I just thought it was relevant to the discussion. That being said, though; it made my head spin for a little while, too.

Originally Posted by Oneironaut

To say nothing of your declaration that you will no longer photoshop your acne out of your pictures (why did you do that, in the first place?). And your - quite popular - camel toe picture in the underwear thread wasn't exactly conservative, was it?

LOL, it was in the thread about taking pics of your underwear, and I decided to be one of the few women brave enough to do it. I didn't realize until after the replies that anything indecent was showing... and I still don't know how to take all that down.

And please don't take that personally. () I'm not digging at you for any pictures you've taken, or for clearing up acne with photoshop. I'm just giving you a hard time, to make a point. We all have our pet peeves. Cattiness just happens to be one of mine. I happen to know very sweet, genuine girls who are also caught up in being 'trendy' (platinum blonde hair, excessive tans, etc.). And while I can understand how such physical appearance can turn some people off, I also understand that to imply that you somehow 'know' someone by a picture of them, or the way they color their hair, or wear their clothes (especially when they are modelling) really just exposes bias, because the truth remains: No matter how much you (read as: anyone) think you have things figured out, you can not truly judge a person by a picture of them, especially when that person is a model and/or otherwise 'posing' for a picture. Believe me, nothing turns me off more than a truly bitchy, fake-ass woman. But I know enough to know that it usually takes more than a picture to find out that much about a person, to start talking shit about them. And when I see hypocrisy on things like this - which is even worse - I just kind of shake my head.

Merely my two cents, though. Feel free to disagree.

Perhaps, but people judge for a reason, and usually, these judgments turn out to be correct. If it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck, then 9 times out of 10 the probability is that it's a duck. As I said before, I've seen a YouTube video of an interview with her, which only confirmed my obvious instincts. Could it perhaps be wishful thinking that she's not only hot but smart too? I'm not trying to make a big point or tear her down just to make me seem better, I'm just agreeing with Erii. I'm pretty sure that when people see me in public, their judgments are probably correct: they probably tell from how I dress and carry myself that I'm shy, finnicky, obsessive, weird, etc. Like the "Judgmental Bastard" segments on Jay Leno.

Perhaps, but people judge for a reason, and usually, these judgments turn out to be correct. If it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck, then 9 times out of 10 the probability is that it's a duck.

You can't hear a duck quack, in a photograph.

"Never judge a book by its cover" is one of the oldest sayings in the...well...book...for a reason. You say that 'usually, these judgements turn out to be correct.' I happen to disagree with that. I think that people, by nature, are biased, judgmental creatures. Most of the time, people confirm their judgmental opinions on the fact that they actually have no confirmation or proof to the contrary - because they make their premature judgments internally and are more apt to consider their own judgements as correct, even when they are making a judgment call on something that can never truly be confirmed. Now, I can see calling a bitch a 'bitch.' I can see calling a whore a 'whore.' What I can't see, is all of these catty chicks who see a woman in skimpy clothing and say "God, what a whore/skank/slut/bitch/etc." I'm going to just flat out disagree with you, that most people are 'correct' in their judgements (this goes double for people who base their psychoanalysis off of a single photograph). In fact, I would say that most people who are quick to judge someone, with very limited information, often don't know wtf they are talking about, or are doing so as a way to solidify their own biases.

I have friends that are bartenders, models, cheerleaders, etc. At first glance, many people would be quick to make the most typical, derogatory comments, based on what they do, or how they look/dress while doing it. The fact is that some of these friends are actually very intelligent and self-sufficient. In fact, I've often prided myself on overcoming peoples' narrow-minded judgments. You can see me walking down the street, wearing baggy jeans, a football jersey, a large chain and a backward hat. Immediately, you would think I'm some backward-ass 'thug,' simply because I happen to like the style. I would go into piano shops in the mall and look around at the instruments, looking like I just came from off the block, sit down at one of the pianos and bust out a little Beethoven. The "WTF??" looks I tend to get are absolutely priceless. Lol.

I'm all for being confident in your assessments of people, but tearing someone down, over a photograph, is just not the mark of an open-minded person, imho. It takes nothing more than socializing with people from multiple circles to know that the most audacious-dressing, fuck-me-eyes-giving flirts can actually be quite down to Earth and respectable of their own bodies, and that the most mildly-clad, seemingly-normal girls can be the most self-centered bitches you've ever met. I would say that it doesn't matter if your suspicions are right 60-70% of the time. Judging that next person, based on looks alone, betrays any notion that one is experienced enough to know that (as I said) you cannot really judge a book by its cover. Slinging vile insults at someone's assumed character, over a photograph of how they appear, is just not the mark of an open-minded individual - doesn't matter how right one assumes that they are.

/imho

^ And that is why I closed my eyes and thought of O' when I lost my virginity.
-----

Originally Posted by Oneironaut

You can't hear a duck quack, in a photograph.

"Never judge a book by its cover" is one of the oldest sayings in the...well...book...for a reason. You say that 'usually, these judgements turn out to be correct.' I happen to disagree with that. I think that people, by nature, are biased, judgmental creatures. Most of the time, people confirm their judgmental opinions on the fact that they actually have no confirmation or proof to the contrary - because they make their premature judgments internally and are more apt to consider their own judgements as correct, even when they are making a judgment call on something that can never truly be confirmed. Now, I can see calling a bitch a 'bitch.' I can see calling a whore a 'whore.' What I can't see, is all of these catty chicks who see a woman in skimpy clothing and say "God, what a whore/skank/slut/bitch/etc." I'm going to just flat out disagree with you, that most people are 'correct' in their judgements (this goes double for people who base their psychoanalysis off of a single photograph). In fact, I would say that most people who are quick to judge someone, with very limited information, often don't know wtf they are talking about, or are doing so as a way to solidify their own biases.

I have friends that are bartenders, models, cheerleaders, etc. At first glance, many people would be quick to make the most typical, derogatory comments, based on what they do, or how they look/dress while doing it. The fact is that some of these friends are actually very intelligent and self-sufficient. In fact, I've often prided myself on overcoming peoples' narrow-minded judgments. You can see me walking down the street, wearing baggy jeans, a football jersey, a large chain and a backward hat. Immediately, you would think I'm some backward-ass 'thug,' simply because I happen to like the style. I would go into piano shops in the mall and look around at the instruments, looking like I just came from off the block, sit down at one of the pianos and bust out a little Beethoven. The "WTF??" looks I tend to get are absolutely priceless. Lol.

I'm all for being confident in your assessments of people, but tearing someone down, over a photograph, is just not the mark of an open-minded person, imho. It takes nothing more than socializing with people from multiple circles to know that the most audacious-dressing, fuck-me-eyes-giving flirts can actually be quite down to Earth and respectable of their own bodies, and that the most mildly-clad, seemingly-normal girls can be the most self-centered bitches you've ever met. I would say that it doesn't matter if your suspicions are right 60-70% of the time. Judging that next person, based on looks alone, betrays any notion that one is experienced enough to know that (as I said) you cannot really judge a book by its cover. Slinging vile insults at someone's assumed character, over a photograph of how they appear, is just not the mark of an open-minded individual - doesn't matter how right one assumes that they are.

/imho

Fair enough. I really don't understand why I come under fire from you in this thread for just agreeing with a couple other people's original statements, though, and ESPECIALLY why you had to drag me down personally. Are you attempting to give me a taste of my own medicine, because I put pictures here once in a while? I'm starting to really regret posting any pictures here. It makes me an easy target, apparently.

Originally Posted by DeeryTheDeer

Fair enough. I really don't understand why I come under fire from you in this thread for just agreeing with a couple other people's original statements, though, and ESPECIALLY why you had to drag me down personally. Are you attempting to give me a taste of my own medicine, because I put pictures here once in a while? I'm starting to really regret posting any pictures here. It makes me an easy target for bullying and sexual harassment, apparently.

I sincerely apologize, if you feel like I'm 'bullying' you, or 'dragging you down.' I swear that that is not my intention. Honestly, I have not read every post in this thread, so I do not really know who all has and has not agreed with you, or who made any original statements. I simply saw your post and felt the need to offer my own opinion. Sometimes it may seem like I ride you kind of hard (figuratively speaking ) because you have some pretty strong opinions about certain things, and I simply happen to disagree with some of your sentiments on certain topics. It's the same reason I will respond to anyone's posts with opposition. Like I said before, I really don't want you to take my points personally. It's just that, sometimes, to make a point really stick, you have to personalize it a little bit, and give the issue some perspective. Many people refuse to see a point that they stand strongly against, unless you expose their own biases and hypocrisies.

I also am not trying to make you regret posting pictures (and I hate to see that you've started taking pictures down...). Plenty of the girls here have posted racy photos. Guys, too. The only reason I brought yours up is because this strong loathing that you have for girls that dress a certain way or change things about themselves (for whatever reason) could be interpreted as misguided, when you apply them to one group of intangible strangers, but not to the girls in the community, who may post a similar look. And when I bring up that I have friends that might fit the physical description of the girls that you bash, it should be apparent that I'm simply sticking up for them, just like I would stick up for you, if someone started talking shit about your assumed personality, based on how you look. Like I said, cattiness is a pet peeve of mine. It's nothing personal, Deery. I like you. We just strongly disagree on some things. And just as you have the right to state your strong opinions on such subjects, I feel compelled to offer my own, when we do disagree.

You see, I have this thing about people who are unnecessarily critical of other people that they don't even know, or know anything about, based on appearances. Maybe this stems for having to deal with racism often. As a woman, I would think that you would sympathize with the concept. So, anytime that I feel like I could interject in such a situation, I tend to. We have to learn to be mindful of our biases and to reap the consequences of our prejudices. All of us. Honestly, I tried to be as respectful to you as possible, while making my point. I'm sorry if it hit little too close to home. Really, I am. I wasn't trying to offend you. It's just that, in my experience, the most effective way to get someone to realize such prejudices as being unfairly placed is to put them into the scenario.

Again, I'm sorry that you took it the way you did. Hope there are no hard feelings.

[Edit]
And, on a happier note, this thread could use a little...

Spoiler for Charlize Theron <3:

I totally understand, Oneironaut.