Thread: Post pictures of sexy hawt females [NO NUDITY!]

Originally Posted by fOrceez

I get pleasure from looking at you, therefore, you are most likely a bitch.

no its because she sexes herself up to look plastic so she knows she can get what she wants from guys who find her attractive because they won't care that she is a bitch because she looks "good".

Originally Posted by Erii

no its because she sexes herself up to look plastic so she knows she can get what she wants from guys who find her attractive because they won't care that she is a bitch because she looks "good".

I get what everyone's saying about don't judge a book by it's cover blah blah, but that type of look is definitely most common within a certain, mainstream, subset of individuals who are quite often bitches.

Originally Posted by Erii

no its because she sexes herself up to look plastic so she knows she can get what she wants from guys who find her attractive because they won't care that she is a bitch because she looks "good".

Basically, she's fake. Her hair is an exaggerated fake color, her skin tone is fake, her boobs are fake, basically everything about her looks fake. Usually, people who are nice and genuine don't do all those fake things to themselves. Just look at guidos with their gel spiked hair, orange fake tan, big muscles (okay not usually fake but still, it all implies something about their ego and where their priorities lie).

Of course I could be totally wrong (now I'm curious enough to look her up on YouTube, lol).

^

going with gavin on this one.

silly boys

I don't care. I'd fuck her whether she's a bitch or not.
Not that she's insanely attractive, just generic. But still hot.

^Girls pit guys against each other. True story.

Originally Posted by ThePieMan

^Girls pit guys against each other. True story.

but I always thought this fact was universally intuitively known

it's good not every guy thinks the same.

i didn't say you was a complete bitch i said she looked like she would be lulz

you can tell what people know they are hot XD

anywho

Nice Erii

I thought this was the Hawt and Sexah females thread, not the Nice and Natural thread....

Ok, proof that fake can be sexy:



























And so can bitchy:



[URL="http://www.hollywoodstarstv.com/views/images/gallery/Shannen_Doherty_59.jpg"]http://www.hollywoodstarstv.com/views/images/gallery/Shannen_Doherty_59.jpg[/IMG]
(Too big, just click the link to see it)

Prepare for hawtness....



Oliva Wilde:








Yvonne Strahovski:








Scarlett johansson:




Cheryl Cole:




Natalie Imbruglia:




Taylor Swift






Celeste Star:







Tori Black:




Lights Poxleitner:







Emma Stone:





Katy Perry:







/enjoy

Originally Posted by LonelyTurtle

Prepare for hawtness....



Oliva Wilde:

MOAR!!!!!!!!!

Literally cannot get enough of her.

Originally Posted by LonelyTurtle

Oliva Wilde:

I really can't get over how hot she was in that movie specifically. The look just raises her to a whole new level of hotness. Maybe because she reminds me of Elijah Wood there for some reason, I don't know. Dark hair and huge, blazing eyes. Plus a strong jawline.

Edited with apologies to Deery - didn't mean to be disrespectful.

Originally Posted by Darkmatters

Dammit O!!
You HAD to make me go look up that cameltoe shot when I'm trying to argue feminism with Deery??

Lmao. While I find this hilarious, I don't want to imply that I'm trying to draw any unwanted attention to Deery for the photo. I just thought it was relevant to the discussion. That being said, though; it made my head spin for a little while, too.

Perhaps, but people judge for a reason, and usually, these judgments turn out to be correct. If it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck, then 9 times out of 10 the probability is that it's a duck.

You can't hear a duck quack, in a photograph.

"Never judge a book by its cover" is one of the oldest sayings in the...well...book...for a reason. You say that 'usually, these judgements turn out to be correct.' I happen to disagree with that. I think that people, by nature, are biased, judgmental creatures. Most of the time, people confirm their judgmental opinions on the fact that they actually have no confirmation or proof to the contrary - because they make their premature judgments internally and are more apt to consider their own judgements as correct, even when they are making a judgment call on something that can never truly be confirmed. Now, I can see calling a bitch a 'bitch.' I can see calling a whore a 'whore.' What I can't see, is all of these catty chicks who see a woman in skimpy clothing and say "God, what a whore/skank/slut/bitch/etc." I'm going to just flat out disagree with you, that most people are 'correct' in their judgements (this goes double for people who base their psychoanalysis off of a single photograph). In fact, I would say that most people who are quick to judge someone, with very limited information, often don't know wtf they are talking about, or are doing so as a way to solidify their own biases.

I have friends that are bartenders, models, cheerleaders, etc. At first glance, many people would be quick to make the most typical, derogatory comments, based on what they do, or how they look/dress while doing it. The fact is that some of these friends are actually very intelligent and self-sufficient. In fact, I've often prided myself on overcoming peoples' narrow-minded judgments. You can see me walking down the street, wearing baggy jeans, a football jersey, a large chain and a backward hat. Immediately, you would think I'm some backward-ass 'thug,' simply because I happen to like the style. I would go into piano shops in the mall and look around at the instruments, looking like I just came from off the block, sit down at one of the pianos and bust out a little Beethoven. The "WTF??" looks I tend to get are absolutely priceless. Lol.

I'm all for being confident in your assessments of people, but tearing someone down, over a photograph, is just not the mark of an open-minded person, imho. It takes nothing more than socializing with people from multiple circles to know that the most audacious-dressing, fuck-me-eyes-giving flirts can actually be quite down to Earth and respectable of their own bodies, and that the most mildly-clad, seemingly-normal girls can be the most self-centered bitches you've ever met. I would say that it doesn't matter if your suspicions are right 60-70% of the time. Judging that next person, based on looks alone, betrays any notion that one is experienced enough to know that (as I said) you cannot really judge a book by its cover. Slinging vile insults at someone's assumed character, over a photograph of how they appear, is just not the mark of an open-minded individual - doesn't matter how right one assumes that they are.

/imho

Originally Posted by Oneironaut

You can't hear a duck quack, in a photograph.

"Never judge a book by its cover" is one of the oldest sayings in the...well...book...for a reason. You say that 'usually, these judgements turn out to be correct.' I happen to disagree with that. I think that people, by nature, are biased, judgmental creatures. Most of the time, people confirm their judgmental opinions on the fact that they actually have no confirmation or proof to the contrary - because they make their premature judgments internally and are more apt to consider their own judgements as correct, even when they are making a judgment call on something that can never truly be confirmed. Now, I can see calling a bitch a 'bitch.' I can see calling a whore a 'whore.' What I can't see, is all of these catty chicks who see a woman in skimpy clothing and say "God, what a whore/skank/slut/bitch/etc." I'm going to just flat out disagree with you, that most people are 'correct' in their judgements (this goes double for people who base their psychoanalysis off of a single photograph). In fact, I would say that most people who are quick to judge someone, with very limited information, often don't know wtf they are talking about, or are doing so as a way to solidify their own biases.

I have friends that are bartenders, models, cheerleaders, etc. At first glance, many people would be quick to make the most typical, derogatory comments, based on what they do, or how they look/dress while doing it. The fact is that some of these friends are actually very intelligent and self-sufficient. In fact, I've often prided myself on overcoming peoples' narrow-minded judgments. You can see me walking down the street, wearing baggy jeans, a football jersey, a large chain and a backward hat. Immediately, you would think I'm some backward-ass 'thug,' simply because I happen to like the style. I would go into piano shops in the mall and look around at the instruments, looking like I just came from off the block, sit down at one of the pianos and bust out a little Beethoven. The "WTF??" looks I tend to get are absolutely priceless. Lol.

I'm all for being confident in your assessments of people, but tearing someone down, over a photograph, is just not the mark of an open-minded person, imho. It takes nothing more than socializing with people from multiple circles to know that the most audacious-dressing, fuck-me-eyes-giving flirts can actually be quite down to Earth and respectable of their own bodies, and that the most mildly-clad, seemingly-normal girls can be the most self-centered bitches you've ever met. I would say that it doesn't matter if your suspicions are right 60-70% of the time. Judging that next person, based on looks alone, betrays any notion that one is experienced enough to know that (as I said) you cannot really judge a book by its cover. Slinging vile insults at someone's assumed character, over a photograph of how they appear, is just not the mark of an open-minded individual - doesn't matter how right one assumes that they are.

/imho

Fair enough. I really don't understand why I come under fire from you in this thread for just agreeing with a couple other people's original statements, though, and ESPECIALLY why you had to drag me down personally. Are you attempting to give me a taste of my own medicine, because I put pictures here once in a while? I'm starting to really regret posting any pictures here. It makes me an easy target, apparently.

Originally Posted by DeeryTheDeer

Fair enough. I really don't understand why I come under fire from you in this thread for just agreeing with a couple other people's original statements, though, and ESPECIALLY why you had to drag me down personally. Are you attempting to give me a taste of my own medicine, because I put pictures here once in a while? I'm starting to really regret posting any pictures here. It makes me an easy target for bullying and sexual harassment, apparently.

I sincerely apologize, if you feel like I'm 'bullying' you, or 'dragging you down.' I swear that that is not my intention. Honestly, I have not read every post in this thread, so I do not really know who all has and has not agreed with you, or who made any original statements. I simply saw your post and felt the need to offer my own opinion. Sometimes it may seem like I ride you kind of hard (figuratively speaking ) because you have some pretty strong opinions about certain things, and I simply happen to disagree with some of your sentiments on certain topics. It's the same reason I will respond to anyone's posts with opposition. Like I said before, I really don't want you to take my points personally. It's just that, sometimes, to make a point really stick, you have to personalize it a little bit, and give the issue some perspective. Many people refuse to see a point that they stand strongly against, unless you expose their own biases and hypocrisies.

I also am not trying to make you regret posting pictures (and I hate to see that you've started taking pictures down...). Plenty of the girls here have posted racy photos. Guys, too. The only reason I brought yours up is because this strong loathing that you have for girls that dress a certain way or change things about themselves (for whatever reason) could be interpreted as misguided, when you apply them to one group of intangible strangers, but not to the girls in the community, who may post a similar look. And when I bring up that I have friends that might fit the physical description of the girls that you bash, it should be apparent that I'm simply sticking up for them, just like I would stick up for you, if someone started talking shit about your assumed personality, based on how you look. Like I said, cattiness is a pet peeve of mine. It's nothing personal, Deery. I like you. We just strongly disagree on some things. And just as you have the right to state your strong opinions on such subjects, I feel compelled to offer my own, when we do disagree.

You see, I have this thing about people who are unnecessarily critical of other people that they don't even know, or know anything about, based on appearances. Maybe this stems for having to deal with racism often. As a woman, I would think that you would sympathize with the concept. So, anytime that I feel like I could interject in such a situation, I tend to. We have to learn to be mindful of our biases and to reap the consequences of our prejudices. All of us. Honestly, I tried to be as respectful to you as possible, while making my point. I'm sorry if it hit little too close to home. Really, I am. I wasn't trying to offend you. It's just that, in my experience, the most effective way to get someone to realize such prejudices as being unfairly placed is to put them into the scenario.

Again, I'm sorry that you took it the way you did. Hope there are no hard feelings.

[Edit]
And, on a happier note, this thread could use a little...

Spoiler for Charlize Theron <3:

I totally understand, Oneironaut.

Originally Posted by Oneironaut

And, on a happier note, this thread could use a little...

Spoiler for Charlize Theron <3:

So many good images were lost in the server crash...

^ And that is why I closed my eyes and thought of O' when I lost my virginity.
-----