 Originally Posted by Neo Neo
That song and video were spot on also, I think
Yeah this part has been the case for me too, at least for the most part. I've usually retained enough awareness of where I am or what part of the day it is ect. I know I started during the afternoon and will end at night. Funny thing about the "delusion" breaking though. I was out at night once (it really was night lol) and was walking around outside with some other people. We had all approached what we saw to be a expansive lake with glowy lights around the edges. I still swear that I saw ripples of water and light reflection from it. Then as we gazed and approached the lake, it turned out to be a house(?) or some kind of building. How I mistook that for a lake I'll never know haha. So I can definitely identify with that part.
Hahaha, that's great. Walking around at night does some pretty crazy things to my visuals actually so that doesn't seem too unreasonable of a mistake to make lol. I actually had the reflection thing once too; the first time I ever took a really high dose of LSD I was staring at a bowl of cannabis when the greens shifted into (at least seemingly) an accurate mirror reflection. It was one of the coolest things I've ever seen, hehe. It's really nuts the kinds of things that psychedelics can do to your visual perception....
 Originally Posted by Neo Neo
I know that I should be relaxed and confident because I've known my approximate dosages and have stuck with "traditional" psychedelics when going into the depths. I just feel like this is some kind of mental barrier I need to break though before I can get to places you and others here have described. You're completely right about that first part and I think that's good advice in general. There was something recent that happened where it "felt" like I was dying, even though I had no rational basis for thinking that I would. I was in a safe setting and was using something I was familiar with. I even had a close friend with me. But I don't know why I was freaking out or feeling that way, it reminded me of something Terence McKenna said where the ego can tell you that "you're dying" even though you're really not. It felt like the illusion of this reality was breaking down around me and that loops where starting to happen. It was weird because this same car had passed by again during this experience, that had gone by earlier. More reasonable dosage ranges would actually calm down my anxieties so that I wouldn't be feeling any for the peak duration. In other instance it felt like I had no control over what I was doing, that reality was "fated" in a way. I'm not sure if this is true, and your degree of control suggests otherwise, unless you've had this feeling of your body being moved by something else. Would it be fate, or the subconscious? And also, how I noticed a lot of "nothingness" in my recent deep level experience. Its something I had felt before in previous psychedelic experiences before. Its weird, kind of how you mentioned about a lonely god splitting itself up into all of us to have more experiences and companions. Although I haven't experienced the void directly, I have caught awareness of it before. Like Ramdass elaborates in Be Here Now, is it really all nothingness? I am also generally open to metaphysical things so its also strange that I should have this many issues with this part of the psychedelic experience lol, but its also humbling to me as well. I think part of my fears is that I was used to dealing in a range of awareness that was "myself" in my body observing what has happening around me. And the difference with things that involve loops and forms of ego death are that you become fully immersed into the experience. I thought I would be prepared to handle reality dramatically changing and letting go of myself but then I learned that I still had a ways to go. And more practice.
Hmm, let me think of a good way to organize this response.... First, I'll address what you said about fate.... Let me describe a little bit how I see life and reality....
As I see it, the universe that we inhabit can be consistently demonstrated to run on stable laws. The math and science behind it is everything.... If the laws of physics could change then the universe would just be a complete mess. With that in mind, I do personally believe that everything in our lives and on in this earth and in this universe has been "fated" to happen since the moment it all popped into existence. If one could theoretically be outside of this universe and these laws of physics and could observe us knowing every single variable as they were each set and the beginning of time and having full access to every equation that needs to be known to compute our reactions, I believe that they could deduce the state of absolutely anything anywhere in our universe at any given moment in the entire span of time. So, to answer that, I do think that it is fate and that we do not have control, in that sense....
Of course, within all that math and science that runs our world, there is something simply beautiful that can emerge... the metaphysics. While I'm sure that there must be some deeper version of this explanation somewhere out there in the background of the cosmos, as far as I see it, the reason that we perceive reality subjectively is just because it makes sense logically.... It exists on a whole other plane from these other aspects of reality, even if it is birthed by them. The mathematics of this universe seem to be set up specifically to follow repetitive patterns and fractal forms to throw subatomic particles and waves around at each other all over the place in trajectories that allow them to start cooperating with each other until some other force comes along and smashes them apart again. That's a pretty oversimplified description, but you get the picture.... Because in this at the time big empty void there is literally nothing but time to waste away, this reality behavioral pattern is allowed to continue until some of the cooperations become so complicated that they actually start building up mechanical processes that allow them to survive more effectively rather than just floating around in whatever constant path. This includes creating a self-replicating mechanism by which it can keep living on through extensions of itself even if the original meets its demise, but they're really all still just one machine. This goes on until those mechanical processes become so immense that one or more of these iterations starts to actually naturally develop hardware which allows it to record information about how it has survived in the past to come up with new ways to continue surviving in the present. At this moment, the metaphysical is born.
As I said in a previous post, I believe that our perception of reality is a snapshot of our memories being written into our brains. Every aspect of our subjective consciousness can be broken down to these neurochemical processes, but however, just because they can all be linked back to them doesn't exactly mean that we can understand them.... A question that occurs to me to ask is: if we were to create an artificial intelligence which worked differently than a human but ran on electricity and could store and process as much information as a human, would it have a subjective experience like we do as well? Though our normal understanding of the difference between life and technology might tell us no, we honestly don't really have any reason to even think one way or the other.... I can tell that any technology has a subjective experience just as much as I can tell that *you* have a subjective experience, or that you can tell that *I* have one, which is not at all. As far as we all know, we may be the only ones experiencing anything rather than just being a piece of hardware. But, if we decide to open up our minds at least a little bit and extend beyond that thought, how can we be sure of just where to draw the line, if there is one at all? Even today we have robots that can capture information and adjust to a scenario, so do they have a subjective experience? How could we ever possibly say that they do or don't? This goes back to how I said that the only way I can rationalize our subjectivity is through human logic.... Can that really be enough?
As an extension of that, I think it's important to remember that literally everything in our subjectivity is also a fake, as you referenced, the illusion of reality. A great example I think and one often talked about is color.... It seems like everyone's had that thought that the colors that you see may not be the colors that someone else sees. This is an entirely logical thought too, because what are these colors even in the first place? In your brain they are just physical values that correspond to visual input, they're like 0s and 1s, or the off and on switches, in a computer's binary code. The fact that we experience an entire array of distinct colors comes from our brains being wired to distinguish between these, just like a program being able to tell you that, for example, a value of 0x01 is red, 0x02 is orange, 0x3 is yellow... and so on. Again, very simplistic for the process actually being described, but it's an accurate comparison. However, with that logic, you have to think... what exactly are these colors anyway? The color that I perceive "green" as, where the hell did it come from? What are the laws of metaphysics that dictate that a subjective experience can include the color that I experience green as? Or what are the laws that make it so that my brain can't see infrared or ultraviolet, but some organisms can? Once again, it can all be rationalized by human logic.... It just makes sense. It has to be that way for our subjective experience to make any sense, that same experience that itself seems to just sort of exists because it should....
So, now there is life which has subjective experience, but at the beginning it was still quite primitive, to the point that such organic technology can be called primitive anyway.... I'm sure there was a lot of trial and error to be done. These organisms now had a mind to use, but that doesn't mean that they were the best minds or that every organism would be in the best spot to use it to its fullest potential. Over time, natural selection would happen and narrow down the survivors to only the fittest.... In the world of increasingly complex lifeforms such as ourselves, it makes perfect sense that the ones who would be able to survive and reproduce the most effectively would be the ones who had the strongest awareness of the separation between the physical correlate of their own subjectivity and the rest of the universe which they needed to avoid. The fascination of it all though is of course that everything that's happening to these organisms was still fated from the very beginning, and there's no way to "avoid" the predestined physics, but simply the fact that the amount of information to work with in reality is so unbelievably vast compared to the processing power of these organic machines and the mathematics involved in the creation of everything are so unfathomably complex and intricate, that to any subjective awareness here on earth it all is literally beyond comprehension, making the entire thing appear as complete chaos. In truth, each organism is not really doing anything to evolve... we're all just following the equations and chemical reactions. But, we just don't realize this because we're not wired to deal with anything more than what's directly in our perception....
Most animals here on earth don't necessarily in themselves have an incredibly complex (by comparison, anyway) comprehension of reality, only needing to create any sort of sense of self to know when to run away from threats and respond to other basic sounds created by other animals of the same or different species.... However, as humans, we have managed to be the part of that original organic machine that has become so utterly amazing at surviving that it developed to the point of being able to easily handle computations far more complex than anything it would have had to deal with that was already on the earth, and as a result out growing societies and technologies and many, many languages began to emerge. Because our brains evolved to learn as many things as they possibly could as it promoted survival, we began to use these devices like language to take a grasp both on the external (the math and science, for example) and the internal, as the more that we allowed ourselves to be exposed to in this world, the more we both understood the workings of our own hardware and the more unique we became by building up a continuously novel blend of experiences that only you and no one else has ever recorded in memory in this exact order. These things contribute strongly to why humans seem to have so much more sense of self than other animals.... We have become so addicted to finding knowledge as our id demands of us that growing our own individual personality simply becomes an endlessly-developing consequence of our lives. And, because to us in terms of how much we can do about it reality is just chaos, it just adds to the feeling that our own experience is unique and is something we create by ourselves, rather than being simply another part of this eternal pattern.
It's incredibly important to remember though that this entire reality that we use to build our sense of self is again itself a lie. It's just the way that our brains developed to allow us to organize and work with our surroundings in the easiest way possible. However, that way is far from true and uses lots of shortcuts.... The color was one example, but what about solid objects? There are no solid objects in reality... there's always space between the particles. But the brain works at such a macroscopic level that it has simply become wired to work that way because it's more convenient to understand. But for me, a pretty major question comes out of that: aren't we solid objects? The reason that we see ourselves as individuals relies pretty heavily on the fact that we perceive ourselves as a force separate from the rest of reality, but we aren't.... Our brains are just a cloud of particles like anything else, and they constantly interact with our environments. Truthfully, "we", as we understand ourselves physically, don't even exist. Essentially, you are an illusion that has become so complex that it has convinced itself not only that it actually exists but that it is even capable of behaving independently in a world of endless possibilities. And, oh the possibilities.... What about things like happiness, sadness, trust, confusion, pride, guilt, lust, love? Again, these are all just metaphysical sensations with physical correlates, and so like colors, that means that they exist in our subjectivity because it just makes sense, it needs to be that way for our wiring to function properly in the laws of physics.... But this lie, this illusion, just happens to be SO beautiful... so perfect even that becoming aware of it doesn't even break it, because it's the only way we're built to exist.... And it's because of this illusion that we, this one cosmic pattern, can in at least one small pocket of reality through this one self-replicating organism experience this miracle of being able to observe and understand and appreciate our own utter brilliance, can share with itself this wonderful delusion of freedom....
So, I have a few different theories about the feeling of a loss of control.... They all center around the ego loss produced by psychedelics. 5-HT2A agonists produce a glutamate release from the prefrontal cortex that projects to areas all over the brain, and this causes strong excitation of these areas. This includes the areas of the brain like the amygdala which would be more associated with the id, and that would be a significant part of how that ego loss by id inflation is caused. I think it's worth noting that while even your ego is truly just part of a pattern playing out, you don't perceive it that way.... As I see it, the process that your brain goes through of many complex chemical reactions that will decide how you react to any given situation is experienced in your subjective awareness as your thought process. As I said before too, I think that our experience of reality is just a memory being written, so it would make sense that our thought process is just a part of that memory. However, because of the way the ego is wired, there's a real-time delusion to it fueled by how absurdly complicated of a process it is that allows us to feel like we're consciously working through everything, which you really are in a way, it's just not that free will kind of way in my opinion, you're just doing what you're programmed to. On the other hand, the id doesn't have this sort of design to it.... While it is influenced by the ego to a degree, what it contributes to your subjectivity doesn't have to actively worked on in your awareness, hence why it is called the subconscious mind. In the model that I proposed before, this would be what causes the loss of control in non-lucid dreams.... Those states of mind would be primarily id with only a little shred of ego to retain some memory, though that shred is actually incredibly important as it is what allows us to grab on to awareness and become lucid. Since psychedelics have even been proven to create similar brain states to dreaming, I think it goes to show that part of the loss of control that you feel on psychedelics could come from this same process of the id taking over your ego, shifting your awareness of reality from the delusion of control to the dissociated realm of simply being another part of the pattern.
There is another thought that I have that extends from this, though. If you think about dreaming as the most similar common natural state to a psychedelic experience, there's a conclusion you can draw from it.... The way that your id takes over your ego during the dream state is just a totally normal part of the machine that is you, a part that you've been wired with for your entire life. It's the same part of you that creates your regular imagination while you're awake, so even if you think of it as the more subconscious part of you, you still associate it with yourself. It's your imagination, your thoughts. But, when you take a drug... it's not the normal cycle of neurochemistry that keeps your brain afloat that's causing these changes, it's the drug itself interfering with or adding upon that cycle. So, for example, even if a psychedelic sends excitatory signals to the part of your brain which is the correlate of the id to suppress your ego, is it actually your natural id that is taking control of you, or is it the psychedelic? It may be hijacking your id to alter the way you think, and it's using your memories and experiences to do so, but really, it's just borrowing your brain. Nothing that normally technically fuels your id is causing this experience to happen.... It's something totally foreign to you. Now, the reason that I and others can still take so much control of a psychedelic trip is because we realize that this hijacked hardware, though not being driven by the system we're used to, is still just a part of our brains, and even if these processes are being activated outside of this complex loop, they're still processes that are so intricately interwoven into every other that they can still be manipulated if you know what you're doing. So, like if the id can intensify the mind and focuses mostly on primal feelings like euphoria and dysphoria, the id controls which the psychedelic has taken control of can do this as well, and that's why your mood will still have a significant impact on a psychedelic experience. One of the ways that this can manifest as well is that if you give into the feelings of loss of control, that feeling of being lost will be intensified as well. That's why experience and research are especially important to getting the most out of the psychedelic realm, if you ask me.
It's important to consider too though I think that ego loss is far from the only thing that psychedelics can do. I talked before about how as I see it our subjective awareness follows some metaphysical rule in that it exists because it's an inherent part of the laws of physics working properly, or seems to anyway.... Like I said, things even like colors, solid objects, and emotions are all illusions which exist solely to allow us to navigate the reality that we inhabit, that we never actually see. Every single thing that we perceive is just another aspect of this illusion, an illusion which can be alarmingly fragile. Our brains have actually evolved to create this, while still flawed, pretty amazingly accurate perception of reality at least when it comes to creating a subjectivity that we can deal with consistent success. The mathematics involved in allowing such an incredibly powerful system to develop naturally are nothing to scoff at.... It's a glorious masterpiece of geometric and fractal mutations four billion years in the making. But, because it is so unbelievably intricate and interwoven and structured in the most effective and most space-saving way possible, putting something into the system which seriously disrupts its natural flow can have some pretty severe consequences. And here's to the point.... If our subjective experience of reality exists because it is a metaphysical correlate of a physical process happening in our brains which are so delicately designed to cause this exact illusion to all come together so perfectly, if our minds can create subjective experiences like colors and emotions which, though stemming from the physical, are things that truly only exist in the metaphysical realm, then what is the limit to the possibilities when something like a drug causes this system which creates this metaphysical experience to function abnormally?
You mentioned the void and nothingness. This is my view on that.... In itself, I think the void is just what happens when you have so much ego loss that you just lose perception of your body. It's the final stage before full amnesia which is technically the true ego death, no memory processing whatsoever. It can feel very severe because it reveals in some respects just how detailed your normal perception of reality is, but I think it's just a perceptual shutdown really. However, what happens in that state can be truly profound, and what that is exactly just depends on that substance you've taken I think. There are three big changes that hallucinogens are measured by: ego suppression, psychological disorientation, and hallucinogenic strength. There are other factors at play at well, but these three things can significantly impact how a trip will play out. First of all, at least some level of ego suppression is required to take you to the void, so that's a given here. With psychedelics, dissociatives, and salvia, it will always be present even if just to a small degree. So, with them it's the psychological and hallucinogenic effect ratios compared to ego loss that really set the trip.... I feel like if all we had was our regular, non-lucid dreams, this might never even have occurred to me. But, this is what's significant to me.... Dreaming itself is the id inflated state so that your imagination is working extremely strongly to create an actual immersive world all around you. Natural states of psychosis as well as many drug-induced psychoses like from amphetamine and just the way that most people normally dream seem to generally suggest that this high activity of the brain may increase associative thinking and the ability to visualize and the like, but it also comes with a strong disorganization of thought. However, lucid dreaming is the response to that.... It proves that even when the mind is working that much in overdrive, you can still have clarity of thought at the same time, and that's why so many lucid dreaming experiences can be so incredibly profound, because it's just your normal imagination but working at maximum capacity.
Psychedelics, dissociatives, and salvia create these same dream-like states as well, so I always thought that there may be some kind of correlation between getting the most out of them and states comparable to lucid dreaming. However, it depends on what you're looking for out of them too.... The interesting thing about these drugs is that they can have functional selectivity at their main hallucinogenic receptors and bind to many other receptors and transporters and et cetera as well, meaning that each of their individual effects can be quite complex. These interactions are likely to contribute greatly to factors such as disorientation, as the more systems in the brain you alter at once, the stranger the result on your subjectivity is going to be. So, here's some examples for me.... I would say that nitrous oxide is ego > psychological > hallucinogenic effects. It takes a pretty high dose with a very smooth ego loss before I start to really feel significantly altered, though when that time comes the cognitive effects can become quite severe and delirious, usually feeling like I'm cycling through an extreme number of my behavioral patterns at once. However, the hallucinations on nitrous for me are always very simple, usually only two dim colors at most and consisting solely of basic geometry. Because nitrous makes me delirious before it even makes me hallucinate, it doesn't tend to seem overly mind-expaning, it just shows you some very bizarre places your consciousness can go. Salvia, on the other hand, I would say is psychological > ego > hallucinogenic. I barely even have to leave my normal perception to become very confused and disoriented on salvia, it definitely has the strongest mental effects of any psychedelic-style substance I've encountered. It certainly then has stronger ego loss than hallucinations after that, but the gap between them is much smaller than it would be for nitrous, with salvia being able to provoke a full range of powerful dream-like visions. But again, like nitrous, because it is so psychologically heavy, it can be difficult to bring things back from them, other than more awareness of just how complex your mind is. However, something should be noted.... At the level of hallucination produced by salvia, entities that are as animated as dream characters can enter your reality. Similarly to a non-lucid dream, these entities can often be weird and random, but also occasionally can be profound, especially if you're in the void, wherein messages received can become much more conceptual.
Then you've got the psychedelics.... Unlike dissociatives and salvia, they tend to be much more lucid. I believe that this is why they are known for causing such profound revelations.... For me, LSD tends to follow the pattern of ego > hallucinogenic > psychological. However, while I did put them in that order, it's worth noting that I don't feel like any three of these categories are very far from each other during an LSD trip. LSD is a strong hallucinogen, but there are definitely tryptamines that are far more so for the same level of ego loss that they cause. However, I do think that LSD may be one of the most delirious psychedelics.... In my experience, it seems quite easy for LSD to cross this line between lucid and non-lucid, the former producing dream-like states which are like your normal imaginative thought processes but more enhanced and therefore cover a lot of personal and profound and metaphysical thoughts, but the latter being more like insane nonsense or experiencing of paradoxical states or impossible objects or the like, more similar to dissociatives or salvia. At the level of the void, I have noticed it going both ways as well.... Sometimes its meaningful in a direct way, and other times it's just conceptual. A similar relationship to this seems to be observed with mushrooms for me as well, except that I would but them as hallucinogenic > ego > psychological. Mushrooms can be incredibly heavy on the mind like LSD and take you deep into that place beyond what words can describe, and the way they effect my ego is actually quite similar, but they're definitely stronger hallucinogens at the same level of trip, with the visuals being much stronger, more 3D or even hyperspatial, and just more overwhelming. I think that this is part of why they're seen as such powerful teacher psychedelics, because they can come with the same emotional maelstrom and descent into madness along the lines of LSD, but because their hallucinogenic state is more intense and dream-like it pushes your imagination even more thoroughly into full-on entity territory like salvia, but because mushrooms are still much more lucid than that despite the head warp it's more likely that the trip will be very deep and personal. Because of the ratio of hallucinogenic to psychological effects too, once the level of the void is reached the experience will start to feel extremely logic-defying, pushing your subjective awareness into states you'd never even dreamed were possible, like synesthesia and echoing perceptions and feelings of becoming everything in your line of sight, feelings that you can't possibly just convey through modern language....
Then there's DMT.... I feel that the reason that DMT is generally considered to be the most powerful psychedelic is because it has the same hallucinogenic > ego > psychological setup as mushrooms, except that the ratio of hallucinogenic to ego effects is even higher, and the ratio of both of those to psychological effects seems to be one of the highest of the known psychedelics, allowing DMT to create an extremely powerful dream-like state that feels incredibly lucid. My theory is that since DMT actually seems to intensify all of these areas of your mind that psychedelics work through to pretty much maximum overdrive and put you in a complete out-of-body experience while also keeping your conscious awareness balanced out and sane, it allows the DMT which is hijacking your id to create entity intelligences with at least the same fluency with which your brain normally produces your own intelligence that you experience at all times, or maybe even more so since your mind is so heavily stimulated at the time. This would be why once people reach the void on DMT they're actually transported to a completely separate reality composed of completely impossible structures which defy time, space, and logic and inhabited by seemingly super-intelligent hyperspatial entities which can communicate to you important personal, spiritual, or cosmic insights which have great relevance even upon sobering up and can be transmitted to you verbally, telepathically, conceptually, or through various forms of complex synesthesia. It's basically like it takes control of your brain to create new thoughts for you at an extremely high operating rate. And this is I feel why, even though some experiences like high dose LSD may be more of just a complete delirious tumble through the mind, DMT may be just unmatched when it comes to truly profound consciousness expansion.
So, I generally perceive that "nothingness" that you feel with the void to be a good thing, as it is a state which shuts out external reality, which in the process lets you let go of every attachment or anxiety you have which I personally experience much like an orgasm, and stimulates the internal reality instead where the real hidden wonders of the psychedelic world can be found. Personally, I think my favorite psychedelics are the ones that can take you there that are both strongly hallucinogenic and heavily psychological.... I love my psychedelic revelations as much as the next person, but one of the biggest reasons that I trip is to see the absolute limits of my consciousness, and for me that involves pushing every variable to the extreme for I push as far as I can possibly go before hitting amnesia. Due to the metaphysical nature of the mind, I actually think of strongly mind-altering substances like hallucinogens but particularly like psychedelics to be sort of like the key to consciousness.... Each psychedelic is unique, so I can use myself the machine as a tool to generate a different, novel logic-defying state using each of them as a catalyst, and that allows me to explore as much of the metaphysical aspect of reality as I possibly can. It's just something that I have to be prepared for at the time to make it actually work to the fullest, something I've been discovering more and more about the psychedelic state over time....
You definitely shouldn't feel any need to rush into it. When the time comes that you're ready for it, it'll happen. It took me years to be able to give into a psychedelic experience enough to start seeing things that are really profound, honestly. I was going in with a LOT of mental baggage, and I actually thank psychedelics for helping me to overcome an extremely large chunk of that.... The deeper you try to go into them, the more you're going to need to be willing to finally face your fears if you really want to see what they have to offer. But, it's okay to go slow until then too.... Psychedelics have a lot to offer even at levels lower than these heavy mystical trips, even when it just comes to fun recreation and enjoying life a bit more. Like you said, just practice.... The more you become used to the psychedelic state the easier it becomes to open up to it, and the more you start to see how useful it can be if you really do want to work on yourself. I think that's a big part of what I realized too.... I was searching for all these really moving experiences, but at the same time I was sort of expecting psychedelics to just kind of change me I think.... Really, the only person who can change you is yourself. The only person who can face your fears is you. The way to get something truly good out of psychedelics is not to go into them looking for change, but to first become ready to change yourself, and then the psychedelics will happily help you find the correct paths to take, and then it's just up to you to actually walk them....
 Originally Posted by Neo Neo
Also something you mentioned in an earlier post definitely rang true for me as well. It seems that the more you try to form a relationship with something, the more it does show you. At least, I feel like it has been this case for me. It may be reverse tolerance too (its starting to seem that most psychedelics have reverse tolerance) or it may be that it also depends on the relationships formed with these things. I like using the term psychedelic, but I'm also inclined to say entheogens, because of all these other aspects at these immersion level experiences.
Yes, most definitely. I have yet to come across a psychedelic or dissociative that does not have reverse tolerance to some extent if treated properly, and all ego loss experiences seem to have at least some level of cross-reverse tolerance with each other. DMT is especially prevalent with this it seems, as I know several people (myself included) whose trips on all other psychedelics but especially things like mushrooms and LSD become much more hyperspatial after each time I smoke DMT.
I tend to use the word psychedelic just to refer to the serotonergic nature of the hallucinations. I don't really like to narrow down the substances too much personally, but sometimes it's hard to avoid.... If it was up to me I would just say that LSD is LSD, DMT is DMT, 2C-B is 2C-B. Calling all three of those compounds along with many others psychedelics is definitely not wrong and anyone who has tried all three can tell you that they cause an overlap in hallucinogenic style, but to infer from calling them all psychedelic that they all produce similar effects would certainly have some unintended consequences....
Entheogen is a good word, though a little subjective too, hehe. Like, some people might not consider 2C-I an entheogen because most find it to be mentally quite lacking, but I personally found it to produce an extremely intense sexual experience to the point of verging on ego death via maximum satisfaction of the libido, which to me is quite spiritual and therefore entheogenic in nature....
 Originally Posted by Neo Neo
Another quick thing too, is your mention of a virtual reality generator. This is something I have felt for sure. When I was describing something to a friend, he mentioned it sounded like Saussurean linguistics, which describes our perception being made of symbolism. At the levels of loops and ego death, it seems that our usual waking life world is no more real or stable then what is happening in the psychedelic realm. I just find this fascinating. Anyway here's some more responses and explanations for why I am having my anxieties.
Oh yes, well as I discussed before, even our perceived external world is all a lie.... Who's to say just how much congruency there actually is between what we perceive and what really exists out there? I think even just things like time dilation show how different our own perception of reality can be from what's actually occurring; it's about what's easiest for us to handle, not about what's actually there.... It is truly amazing stuff, life is just nuts. 
 Originally Posted by Neo Neo
Edit: And that Ezra vs Ezra AMV, awesome lol.
Isn't it though? Here's another video that is a pretty good example of how I've felt before on LSD:
|
|
Bookmarks