 Originally Posted by LucidJuggalo
No, as that condition [schizophrenia] is a chemical imbalance. No amount of imagining gives somebody a chemical change - you're either born with it, or you do too many drugs..
Schizophrenia is a category of symptoms, with the word literally meaning split mind. The definition assumes nothing about the cause, chemical or otherwise.
A sufficiently traumatic memory can often push a person into schizophrenia, as a person tries to protect themselves from it. And a sensate experience isn't essentially different from a self-induced lucid experience, from the standpoint of the person who experiences it, depending on how confused they become about what the experience represents.
A person can argue that schizophrenia as a result of traumatic stress had an underlying congenital or drug "chemical" cause. However, all sane people have at least mild predispositions towards various mental disfunctions, and these predispositions are largely unknown, so in this sense its an academic distinction. In any case, use of imagination definitely alters connections in a person's brain. And if what is imagined is radical and self-reinforcing, it is not easily undone.
I've never done any kind of drugs, but two 'conscious' parts of my mind do work with a high degree of independence. Though I was no doubt predisposed to this, it is also to a significant extent a result of meditative practice. And all people already have parts of their mind that work independently of other parts. This allows people to multi-task, and protects important 'subconscious' processes from being overpowered by other impulses. The lines that divide these aren't entirely set in concrete though, a person has some latitude to alter them and empower the different parts differently, by intentionally becoming aware of the the interrelationships.
I'm completely sane in the sense that the two conscious 'sides' are objectively honest and share a lot of information with other, but there is a clear division, and not everything is immediately shared. I suspect that I could push this to a full-blown split personality 'disorder' if I had a reason to. In any case, I think you're right to have a doubt about 'dissociation', and if it were me I wouldn't pursue the subject unless I needed to. If you create a 'tulpa' its like having a mental child, you can't just make it disappear back into its imaginative womb, or lock it away in a subconscious closet someplace, the moment you tire of it.
 Originally Posted by LucidJuggalo
In the right context, I can agree with bringing something to life... but ''other people can see it''? Complete crap. It's a hallucination - you can't subject people to your hallucinations.
You were asking about tulpas. Yes you can subject other people to your hallucinations if you make it their hallucination also. This is easier with some degree of willingness on their part, and it would be wrong otherwise, but it doesn't require their understanding of what's going on. We've talked about this a lot on this site in the context of shared dreaming, but I've seen this in waking life also. If you think that this is delusional, based on your beliefs and experience, then maybe this is more evidence that you don't want to try to find out more about tulpas. Clearly there's a correlation between delusion and experience with tulpas, and who knows which is causal.
|
|
Bookmarks